265:. There is no significant coverage to indicate that this firm of solicitors has participated in a notable court cases, nor has it any notable staff or partners, nor is the firm itself notable in any way (size, history, development, campaigning or research), and falls well short of the requirements of
354:"Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information...smaller organizations can be notable...arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations"
48:. Rationale: The closing editor does not find it to be conclusively shown that the topic is non-notable. Opinions about the weight of existing sources establishing notability are evenly divided.
138:
article that briefly talks up this company, and their name is mentioned in a bare handful of news articles reporting particular legal cases, but none give enough reason for notability.
87:
82:
91:
347:
214:
74:
120:
158:
322:
The Times Online article doesn't really provide significant coverage IMO, it just cheers them for having a cute name and a nice looking webiste. Other than that, fails
218:
350:. Notable with respect to its specialist and unique field of practice in serving an often misuderstood and maligned group of road users. To quote
282:
336:
311:
285:
249:
230:
202:
175:
147:
56:
17:
78:
70:
62:
377:
36:
273:
fall outside the scope of
Knowledge (XXG), especially news stories which are promotional in tone and content. --
376:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
135:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
278:
309:
200:
173:
361:
356:
143:
127:
334:
274:
302:
193:
166:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
266:
262:
258:
226:
351:
323:
270:
238:
The Times Online article is sufficient for notability. One really good source is enough.
139:
131:
328:
245:
108:
222:
49:
295:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
186:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
240:
370:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
300:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
191:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
380:). No further edits should be made to this page.
159:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
346:Found two articles of coverage relating via
261:. A mere metention in two news stories is
153:
157:: This debate has been included in the
257:as this article is little more than a
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
71:White Dalton Motorcycle Solicitors
63:White Dalton Motorcycle Solicitors
24:
213:. I couldn't find coverage via
1:
364:) 11:21, 05 August 2009 (GMT)
263:not evividence of notability
397:
57:21:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
337:21:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
312:18:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
286:10:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
259:public relations exercise
250:05:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
231:00:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
203:00:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
176:00:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
148:19:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
373:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
271:purely on news coverage
333:
44:The result was
327:
314:
269:. Articles based
205:
178:
162:
388:
375:
331:
305:
299:
297:
196:
190:
188:
169:
163:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
396:
395:
391:
390:
389:
387:
386:
385:
384:
378:deletion review
371:
329:
303:
293:
194:
184:
167:
134:. There is one
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
394:
392:
383:
382:
366:
365:
340:
339:
316:
315:
298:
290:
289:
288:
252:
233:
207:
206:
189:
181:
180:
179:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
393:
381:
379:
374:
368:
367:
363:
359:
358:
353:
349:
345:
342:
341:
338:
335:
332:
325:
321:
318:
317:
313:
310:
307:
306:
296:
292:
291:
287:
284:
280:
276:
275:Gavin Collins
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
242:
237:
234:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
208:
204:
201:
198:
197:
187:
183:
182:
177:
174:
171:
170:
160:
156:
152:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
372:
369:
355:
343:
319:
304:Juliancolton
301:
294:
254:
239:
235:
219:Google Books
210:
195:Juliancolton
192:
185:
168:Juliancolton
165:
154:
136:Times Online
126:
46:NO CONSENSUS
45:
43:
31:
28:
348:Google News
215:Google News
357:Motorbike1
132:notability
283:contribs)
140:Dbratland
130:. Fails
128:WP:ADVERT
221:either.
121:View log
50:·Maunus·
267:WP:CORP
88:protect
83:history
352:WP:ORG
324:WP:ORG
320:Delete
255:Delete
223:tedder
211:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
362:talk
344:Keep
279:talk
246:talk
236:Keep
227:talk
164:-- –
155:Note
144:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
330:Ray
241:DGG
217:or
326:.
308:|
248:)
229:)
199:|
172:|
161:.
146:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
360:(
281:|
277:(
244:(
225:(
142:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
54:·
52:ƛ
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.