Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Widow Sunday - Knowledge

Source 📝

257:
they appears to be serious music publications, with, in the first case a staff of writers, and in the second a primary writer who has experience as a writer for mainstream media. Both provide the identities of their writers, appear to have and discuss their editorial standards, and both appear to be
258:
independent. I'm not sure if its enough to meet the threshold for notability, but I think it deserves discussion at the very least. (I dropped the third source I mentioned in the user talk comment after further review)
181: 246:
Some of the sources are borderline reliable. None of them are ideal from a notability standpoint, and I know there are those who reject the idea that a blog can be a reliable source. Looking specifically at
323: 175: 136: 141: 72: 109: 104: 113: 17: 196: 96: 163: 421: 40: 363: 157: 285:. I don't think the ones above or those that I turned up pass muster. Clearly this group exists, but it's 66: 153: 417: 400: 369: 337: 314: 271: 237: 78: 36: 100: 203: 359: 231: 189: 92: 84: 302: 264: 217: 396: 333: 286: 55: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
416:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
381: 348: 298: 310: 169: 255:(links to info on the sources, the coverage of the band is available in the ref section) 226: 294: 259: 392: 329: 282: 221: 213: 130: 290: 306: 384:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
351:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
301:
because of reliable sources in particular, but also as to the alternative
248: 281:— I found mostly sources in the blogosphere, which are usually not 251: 410:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
220:. CSD challenged on basis of last 3 refs, which are not 324:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
126: 122: 118: 188: 391:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 358:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 224:. First 6 refs are blogs and/or self-published. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 424:). No further edits should be made to this page. 202: 8: 322:Note: This debate has been included in the 321: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 293:, especially to the degree of 1: 441: 401:14:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 370:05:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 79:11:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC) 413:Please do not modify it. 338:18:57, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 315:06:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 272:03:14, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 238:03:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 212:Challenged CSD. Not 48:The result was 403: 372: 340: 327: 269: 256: 432: 415: 390: 386: 366: 357: 353: 328: 265: 262: 254: 236: 234: 229: 222:reliable sources 207: 206: 192: 144: 134: 116: 75: 69: 61: 58: 34: 440: 439: 435: 434: 433: 431: 430: 429: 428: 422:deletion review 411: 379: 368: 364: 346: 268: 260: 232: 227: 225: 149: 140: 107: 91: 88: 73: 67: 59: 56: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 438: 436: 427: 426: 406: 405: 404: 388: 387: 376: 375: 374: 373: 362: 360:The Bushranger 355: 354: 343: 342: 341: 318: 317: 275: 274: 266: 210: 209: 146: 87: 82: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 437: 425: 423: 419: 414: 408: 407: 402: 398: 394: 389: 385: 383: 378: 377: 371: 367: 365:One ping only 361: 356: 352: 350: 345: 344: 339: 335: 331: 325: 320: 319: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 289:to call them 288: 284: 280: 277: 276: 273: 270: 263: 252: 249: 245: 242: 241: 240: 239: 235: 230: 223: 219: 215: 205: 201: 198: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 155: 152: 151:Find sources: 147: 143: 138: 132: 128: 124: 120: 115: 111: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 89: 86: 83: 81: 80: 76: 70: 64: 63: 62: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 412: 409: 380: 347: 278: 244:Leaning Keep 243: 211: 199: 193: 185: 178: 172: 166: 160: 150: 93:Widow Sunday 85:Widow Sunday 54: 53: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 303:WP:MUSICBIO 176:free images 287:WP:TOOSOON 418:talk page 330:• Gene93k 299:WP:ANYBIO 228:GregJackP 37:talk page 420:or in a 382:Relisted 349:Relisted 283:reliable 218:musicbio 216:, fails 137:View log 74:contribs 39:or in a 393:BusterD 291:notable 233:Boomer! 214:notable 182:WP refs 170:scholar 110:protect 105:history 57:Phantom 295:WP:GNG 279:Delete 154:Google 114:delete 307:JFHJr 261:Monty 197:JSTOR 158:books 142:Stats 131:views 123:watch 119:links 60:Steve 16:< 397:talk 334:talk 250:and 190:FENS 164:news 127:logs 101:talk 97:edit 68:talk 297:or 267:845 204:TWL 139:• 135:– ( 399:) 336:) 326:. 313:) 305:. 253:, 184:) 129:| 125:| 121:| 117:| 112:| 108:| 103:| 99:| 77:\ 52:. 395:( 332:( 311:㊟ 309:( 208:) 200:· 194:· 186:· 179:· 173:· 167:· 161:· 156:( 148:( 145:) 133:) 95:( 71:| 65:/

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
PhantomSteve
talk
contribs
11:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Widow Sunday
Widow Sunday
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
notable

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.