374:, and human knowledge is lumpy, spotty, unfair, and uneven. This article must stand and fall on the merits of its own subject, and if that subject is not a part of the corpus of human knowledge then it doesn't belong here, even if other similar subjects are part of the corpus of human knowledge. And vice versa, of course. So where are these "good sources" that you claim to exist? Cite them!
296:
To clarify: This article does need more sources, but there are at least 2 out there. Sister-articles have been kept without sources, so fixing all or deleting all is our option. I think that it's worth fixing all of them, because there appear to be good sources. They just aren't cited.
355:
I am the original contributor of the entry. I don't have strong views one way or the other about its retention. I do agree that it makes sense to treat the various forks consistently. Perhaps a longer description of each fork on the WakkaWiki
317:
per Gosox. If sufficient sources are findable to support an article then it's better to wait for these to be added (and re-evaluate the article then) rather than deleting now .
148:
175:
88:
66:
17:
370:
Knowledge (XXG) is not about fairness and consistency. It is about systematizing and presenting the corpus of human knowledge
425:
36:
115:
110:
119:
424:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
61:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
201:
102:
279:
per precedent: the article is a fork of WakkaWiki. Other forks have been kept. Delete all, or keep this.
409:
235:
361:
357:
302:
284:
56:
53:
106:
411:
383:
365:
350:
326:
306:
288:
267:
239:
213:
190:
164:
72:
49:
402:
379:
346:
322:
209:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
231:
98:
78:
186:
160:
298:
280:
260:
375:
342:
318:
205:
136:
182:
156:
395:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
253:
225:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
339:
418:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
336:"here appear to be good sources. They just aren't cited."
143:
132:
128:
124:
338:
is not a valid argument. The article's only reference(
400:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
230:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
176:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
200:This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing
170:
174:: This debate has been included in the
86:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
85:
24:
341:) is completely inadequate. —
1:
89:Articles for deletion/WikiNi
445:
384:20:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
73:00:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
412:00:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
366:22:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
351:20:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
327:20:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
307:13:40, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
289:13:40, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
277:Clean-up (adding sources)
268:01:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
240:23:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
214:11:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
191:19:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
165:19:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
421:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
250:per nom; no notability
84:AfDs for this article:
204:). It is listed now.
44:The result was
414:
372:as it actually is
266:
242:
193:
179:
155:Lacks notability
436:
423:
405:
399:
397:
265:
263:
257:
251:
229:
227:
180:
146:
140:
122:
69:
64:
59:
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
419:
403:
393:
261:
255:
252:
223:
142:
113:
97:
94:
82:
67:
62:
57:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
415:
398:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
353:
329:
311:
310:
309:
270:
244:
243:
228:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
195:
194:
153:
152:
93:
92:
91:
83:
81:
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
422:
416:
413:
410:
407:
406:
396:
392:
391:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
269:
264:
259:
258:
249:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
226:
222:
221:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
184:
177:
173:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
150:
145:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
90:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
420:
417:
404:Juliancolton
401:
394:
371:
335:
331:
314:
293:
276:
272:
254:
247:
224:
171:
154:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
232:Ron Ritzman
358:Campingcar
299:Gosox5555
281:Gosox5555
356:article.
149:View log
50:WP:NPASR
376:Uncle G
343:Rankiri
332:Comment
319:Cynical
294:Comment
206:DumbBOT
116:protect
111:history
54:King of
248:Delete
202:step 3
144:delete
120:delete
99:WikiNi
79:WikiNi
256:Chzz
183:Dandv
157:Dandv
147:) – (
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
380:talk
362:talk
347:talk
323:talk
315:Keep
303:talk
285:talk
275:and
273:Keep
236:talk
210:talk
187:talk
172:Note
161:talk
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
408:|
382:)
364:)
349:)
334:.
325:)
305:)
287:)
262:►
238:)
212:)
189:)
178:.
163:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
71:♠
52:.
48:.
378:(
360:(
345:(
321:(
313:'
301:(
283:(
234:(
208:(
185:(
181:—
159:(
151:)
141:(
139:)
101:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.