277:
is one of the cornerstones of
Knowledge, but also one of the most controversial and hardest to fulfill; it causes most of our really serious conflicts. Wikinfo is the best known attempt to try an alternate approach, "sympathetic point of view", and see if it can be equally useful to the public while
358:
I would say that a lack of sources is the most important grounds for deleting an article. I had a look around, incidentally, and could not find any externally reliable sources, so I don't think improvement to bring it in line with policy is possible. I'd be delighted to be proved otherwise, but the
278:
easier to fulfill by the editors. Anyone who doesn't think NPOV can ever really be achieved is welcome to try to do a better job there. It's in every way a
Knowledge-friendly project, run by one of the longest serving members of our
341:
The fact that a
Knowledge article doesn't agree with policy isn't grounds for deleting it, but for improving it. Despite the lack of sources, this article covers a notable item, and it deserves a chance to grow.
92:. Basically wikipedia does not keep articles just because they have a website. Knowledge requires a second party source like a newspaper article (please see those guideline links, it has to fullfill them).
294:
the nomination seems to be in bad faith, but there aren't actually any reliable sources for this that I could find, making it basically the same as a self-reference. It's a glimpse into the
302:
requirements. That said, I could see this coming in useful, so I'd suggest that it get moved to the
Knowledge namespace until the world outside Wikis starts to report on it.
170:
282:. Also note the fact that it was nominated by a twice-voting sockpupeteer, who may have his own reasons to want to get back at the arbcom.
187:
I never understood how this got into
Knowledge, especially when the page was created by the owner of the site. I made a copy of the page
244:
It is notable not as a website, but as an open source project fork of a very notable project. Thus, WEB is irrelevant. (It is listed
17:
81:
401:
383:
51:
36:
400:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
60:
255:
221:
343:
236:
191:
112:
386:
370:
346:
333:
321:
309:
286:
261:
239:
227:
206:
194:
177:
148:
135:
119:
96:
64:
318:
188:
235:
gives three ways in which a website is notable. Can I ask which one
Wikinfo satisfies? Thanks,
245:
56:
48:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
279:
249:
215:
158:
132:
93:
77:
295:
283:
174:
274:
162:
108:
364:
330:
303:
232:
166:
145:
89:
360:
299:
85:
203:
382:
as a notable
Knowledge fork, nominated for deletion by way of sockpuppet.
70:
298:, and especially when this is the case it absolutely needs to follow
394:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
Nominator blocked as sock of
Hardvice, voted delete below.
80:
17:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC) To explain better: it fails
248:
as one of the 43 best wikis (not that it really is)).
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
76:I can't find any notable sources in the article.
404:). No further edits should be made to this page.
171:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hardvice
8:
131:No one has voted after a day, so I will.
363:is really on those wishing to keep it.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
273:, on a rather unique basis.
214:, notable fork of Knowledge
421:
292:Transfer to Wikipediaspace
387:02:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
371:22:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
347:22:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
334:13:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
322:13:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
310:00:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
287:12:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
262:23:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
240:21:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
228:16:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
207:15:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
195:13:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
178:16:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
149:12:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
136:05:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
120:16:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
97:19:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
65:04:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
397:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
202:per nom and vanity.
61:(The people rejoice!)
161:has been banned as
361:burden of evidence
329:per BrokenSegue --
165:of second voter,
116:
63:
412:
399:
367:
317:per BrokenSegue
306:
114:
82:notable (WP:WEB)
59:
54:
46:an obvious keep.
34:
420:
419:
415:
414:
413:
411:
410:
409:
408:
402:deletion review
395:
365:
344:Thesocialistesq
304:
296:sausage factory
74:
52:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
418:
416:
407:
406:
390:
389:
376:
375:
374:
373:
350:
349:
336:
324:
312:
289:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
209:
197:
182:
181:
180:
138:
125:
124:
123:
122:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
417:
405:
403:
398:
392:
391:
388:
385:
381:
378:
377:
372:
369:
362:
357:
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
345:
340:
337:
335:
332:
328:
325:
323:
320:
316:
313:
311:
308:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
285:
281:
276:
272:
269:
263:
260:
258:
254:
252:
247:
243:
242:
241:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
226:
224:
220:
218:
213:
210:
208:
205:
201:
198:
196:
193:
190:
186:
183:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
152:
151:
150:
147:
143:
139:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:
121:
118:
110:
106:
103:
102:
101:
100:
99:
98:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
62:
58:
55:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
396:
393:
379:
355:
338:
326:
314:
291:
270:
256:
250:
237:Gerard Foley
222:
216:
211:
199:
192:Gerard Foley
184:
154:
141:
140:
128:
104:
75:
45:
43:
31:
28:
384:Yamaguchi先生
159:FurryiamIAM
133:FurryiamIAM
94:FurryiamIAM
78:FurryiamIAM
284:AnonEMouse
175:AnonEMouse
163:sockpuppet
157:Nominator
280:WP:ARBCOM
109:Hipocrite
331:Vovanium
167:Hardvice
146:Hardvice
368:iggurat
307:iggurat
155:Comment
105:Comment
71:Wikinfo
319:vovkav
233:WP:WEB
200:Delete
185:Delete
169:. See
142:Delete
129:Delete
90:WP:NOR
88:, and
57:rbil10
356:Reply
339:Keep.
253:roken
219:roken
204:Anomo
49:RyanG
16:<
380:Keep
327:Keep
315:Keep
300:WP:V
275:NPOV
271:Keep
259:egue
246:here
225:egue
212:Keep
189:here
144:NN.
115:Talk
86:WP:V
173:.
111:-
84:,
366:Z
305:Z
257:S
251:B
223:S
217:B
117:»
113:«
53:e
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.