470:. I don't weigh in at AFD without looking for sources, and I usually confine myself to subjects where I know something about the field or context. Sourcing appears to have been largely confined to a flurry of articles at the projects 10th anniversary, have you found significant coverage since then? Nominating oneself for World Heritage status is a widely used self-publicity technique. Moreover, despite the extremely politicized nature of the World Heritage selection process, World Heritage truly is focused on the physical past.
402:: this is not thought through. Just because Knowledge (XXG) is (currently) the major encyclopedia of humanity it ought to not cover the notable cultural phenomena of itself? Knowledge (XXG) needs to cover itself properly as itself is an integral part of contemporary culture. The amount of news coverage about this outreach proves its notability. --
522:
The exceptionality of this outreach makes it just more notable. Also: things aren't always the best the way they are. Sometimes deviating from common practice can be a good thing. If this project would mean or imply a rethinking of the concept of world heritage it would make this project just way
361:
Nothing should be merged into the outlines as those are just showing the hierarchical relationships (via tree structure) of the various topics of a field. There shouldn't really be content on these pages that isn't to be found in articles already.
177:
171:
130:
280:
or another closely-linked article if others wish because this may not actually need to be severely deleted and could be salvaged elsewhere. Unlikely independently notable though,
244:
103:
98:
107:
137:
90:
209:
451:
192:
66:
327:
94:
330:
159:
339:
17:
510:
I don't think that
Knowledge (XXG) needs publicity. Knowledge (XXG) being declared world heritage makes sense and isn't just some
348:
502:
I've linked 9 major news articles above. All of them have the world heritage project, not the 10th birthday as their main story.
599:
580:
548:
479:
457:
417:
394:
377:
316:
292:
260:
236:
153:
86:
78:
72:
224:
428:
301:
149:
618:
40:
199:
336:
277:
446:
287:
61:
574:, "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article".
165:
614:
576:
475:
390:
312:
36:
342:
595:
333:
441:
438:
356:
282:
185:
56:
53:
571:
544:
413:
373:
218:
351:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
613:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
497:
471:
386:
467:
591:
253:
563:
527:
506:
Nominating oneself for World
Heritage status is a widely used self-publicity technique
567:
534:
403:
363:
213:
345:
124:
248:
570:. As such, an article about the topic is wholly qualified. See also
526:
Anyways, from the listed sources it's clear that the article meets
607:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
590:
in the hope that it can be improved and more sources found. --
431:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
304:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
326:: Clearly notable and more than enough news coverage. (
120:
116:
112:
184:
566:
per a review of some of the sources listed above by
518:
World
Heritage truly is focused on the physical past
437:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
310:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
198:
210:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) for World Heritage
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
621:). No further edits should be made to this page.
489:have you found significant coverage since then?
245:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
242:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
514:. Also that's unfounded speculation.
208:Not notable, possible redirect to
87:Knowledge (XXG) for World Heritage
79:Knowledge (XXG) for World Heritage
24:
212:. No secondary sources either. -
562:– The topic comfortably passes
1:
600:14:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
581:23:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
549:20:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
480:19:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
458:05:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
418:23:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
395:23:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
378:22:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
317:02:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
293:05:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
73:01:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
261:06:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
237:04:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
271:I suppose if not mergeable.
638:
278:Outline to Knowledge (XXG)
610:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
466:User:Fixuture, Kindly
512:publicity-technique
385:As self-promotion.
232:TheChampionMan1234
460:
319:
263:
257:
235:
629:
612:
579:
519:
507:
501:
490:
454:
449:
444:
436:
434:
432:
360:
315:
309:
307:
305:
290:
285:
276:this perhaps to
258:
255:
251:
229:
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
637:
636:
632:
631:
630:
628:
627:
626:
625:
619:deletion review
608:
575:
517:
505:
495:
488:
461:
452:
447:
442:
427:
425:
354:
320:
311:
300:
298:
288:
283:
254:
249:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
635:
633:
624:
623:
603:
602:
584:
583:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
531:
524:
520:
515:
508:
503:
492:
491:
483:
482:
435:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
380:
357:SwisterTwister
308:
297:
296:
295:
284:SwisterTwister
265:
264:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
634:
622:
620:
616:
611:
605:
604:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
585:
582:
578:
577:North America
573:
569:
565:
561:
558:
557:
550:
546:
542:
541:
537:
532:
529:
525:
523:more notable.
521:
516:
513:
509:
504:
499:
494:
493:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
455:
450:
445:
440:
433:
430:
419:
415:
411:
410:
406:
401:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
370:
366:
358:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
321:
318:
314:
313:North America
306:
303:
294:
291:
286:
281:
279:
275:
270:
267:
266:
262:
259:
252:
246:
241:
240:
239:
238:
233:
227:
226:
221:
220:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
609:
606:
587:
559:
539:
535:
511:
426:
408:
404:
399:
382:
368:
364:
323:
299:
273:
272:
268:
231:
223:
217:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
498:E.M.Gregory
472:E.M.Gregory
387:E.M.Gregory
324:Strong keep
172:free images
592:OpenFuture
230:(Formerly
615:talk page
588:Weak keep
572:WP:NEXIST
37:talk page
617:or in a
568:Fixuture
429:Relisted
302:Relisted
225:contribs
214:Champion
131:View log
39:or in a
439:King of
400:Comment
353:) Also
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
468:WP:AGF
383:Delete
150:Google
108:delete
540:uture
409:uture
369:uture
274:Merge
250:/wiae
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
596:talk
564:WP:N
560:Keep
545:talk
528:WP:N
476:talk
414:talk
391:talk
374:talk
289:talk
269:Keep
256:/tlk
219:talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
50:keep
222:) (
200:TWL
129:– (
52:.
598:)
547:)
538:ix
533:--
478:)
456:♠
416:)
407:ix
393:)
376:)
367:ix
362:--
350:,
347:,
344:,
341:,
338:,
335:,
332:,
329:,
247:.
228:)
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
594:(
543:(
536:F
530:.
500::
496:@
474:(
453:♣
448:♦
443:♥
412:(
405:F
389:(
372:(
365:F
359::
355:@
234:)
216:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.