276:- The article fails to assert any notability. Download links should not be included, as Knowledge (XXG) is not for advertising and these links don't establish any notability. Blogs do not establish notability as a lot of editors here consider them non-verifiable, conflict-of-interest, and of low notability themselves. Most importantly, the article is not written in an encyclopedic tone, and does not provide any assertion of notability.
239:
Modification about notability will be included to the Wilos' description but I would like to say that your article defining them is not very explicit. It could have include some examples for people not used to write
Knowledge (XXG) articles. It was not our intentions to make one
193:; those are the criteria that all articles on Knowledge (XXG) must meet, and in this discussion, we're deciding whether or not this article meets that criteria. It's possible that it would also be helpful for you to carefully read our
220:
120:
252:
Could you tell us the article is meeting global notability requirements or if there is something else to be changed. We'll be glad to do it. Thanks.
17:
295:
36:
277:
93:
88:
294:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
97:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
80:
253:
241:
202:
136:
265:
174:
84:
280:
268:
256:
244:
230:
206:
177:
165:
153:
140:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
198:
162:
132:
194:
76:
68:
190:
128:
53:
49:
57:
114:
227:
173:
I don't understand why would you to delete this page? Could you more explain?.
150:
288:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:. There are no references or links that show notability. --
110:
106:
102:
264:
I don't think blogs and download links are notable.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
127:There is no evidence that this program meets the
298:). No further edits should be made to this page.
161:for lack of coherent assertion of notability.
8:
131:; prod removed without comment by creator.
219:: This debate has been included in the
189:It might be helpful for you to read the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
221:list of Software-related deletions
24:
195:conflict of interest guidelines
1:
315:
281:18:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
269:15:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
257:00:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
245:00:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
231:04:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
207:19:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
178:04:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
166:04:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
154:00:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
63:21:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
291:Please do not modify it.
141:21:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
48:due to failure to meet
278:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
191:notability criteria
129:notability criteria
250:Notability proved
233:
224:
306:
293:
225:
215:
118:
100:
60:
34:
314:
313:
309:
308:
307:
305:
304:
303:
302:
296:deletion review
289:
228:John Vandenberg
91:
75:
72:
58:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
312:
310:
301:
300:
284:
283:
271:
266:Macktheknifeau
259:
254:sadasblackmilk
247:
242:sadasblackmilk
234:
212:
211:
210:
209:
181:
180:
168:
156:
125:
124:
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
311:
299:
297:
292:
286:
285:
282:
279:
275:
272:
270:
267:
263:
260:
258:
255:
251:
248:
246:
243:
238:
237:Modifications
235:
232:
229:
222:
218:
214:
213:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
167:
164:
160:
157:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
290:
287:
273:
261:
249:
236:
216:
186:
170:
158:
146:
126:
45:
43:
31:
28:
199:FisherQueen
163:Someguy1221
133:FisherQueen
175:thededer
121:View log
94:protect
89:history
274:delete
262:Delete
159:Delete
151:Sbluen
147:Delete
98:delete
46:delete
187:Reply
115:views
107:watch
103:links
77:Wilos
69:Wilos
56:. ···
16:<
240:bad.
217:Note
203:Talk
171:Why?
137:Talk
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
54:WP:V
52:and
50:WP:N
226:--
223:.
197:. -
119:– (
59:日本穣
205:)
139:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
201:(
135:(
123:)
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.