437:. There is usefulness in having a compete set of entries on hereditary peers, even if some peers are less prominent or noteworthy than others, even when the article must of necessity remain something of a stub. Considering these articles in isolation, i.e. not noting that they are part of a wider series, is mistaken. It strikes me as important to let the relevant wikiproject(s) know about these sorts of deletion proposals.--
234:
and elsewhere: "There is usefulness in having a compete set of entries on hereditary peers, even if some peers are less prominent or noteworthy than others, even when the article must of necessity remain something of a stub. Considering these articles in isolation, i.e. not noting that they are part
231:
347:
From an objective point of view I read this article as: Spent Two years as product designer, inherited the family title and now runs the family estate. Is a motoring enthusiast but has done nothing in the world of motoring to mark him out as individually
165:
454:
definitely fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP. "Being born" cannot mean notability, as
Flaming Ferrari underlines there are no other notable activities. For the sake of completeness a row in a table is enough. --
159:
91:
86:
95:
546:. I think I'm coming down on the side of keeping articles on peers or their heirs, whether or not they sit in the House of Lords, as all their predecessors did (and therefore all meet
273:
253:
78:
293:
125:
118:
471:: whether or not one approves of the hereditary peerage (and baronetage), there are still plenty of people interested in the present holder of an historical title.
399:, which is about requiring reliable sources to be available. Judging from the large number of deletions of pages on Earls and Marquesses you have proposed,
82:
180:
147:
366:
I'm curious. What is your understanding of the general notability guidelines? And how does your understanding differentiate from your comment here?
74:
66:
559:
538:
513:
494:
480:
463:
446:
429:
412:
381:
357:
335:
305:
285:
265:
244:
213:
60:
141:
403:, you seem to have the view that peers not in the House of Lords are inherently non-notable, but even an Earl has only to meet the GNG.
525:
is fairly high up in the peerage, and a very old title at that, one of the oldest if my information is correct. The fact that he owns
137:
17:
504:-- Being the owner of Wilton House, one of the great country houses of England and of an estate of 14000 acres is surely notable.
187:
53:
420:, per Moonraker's rationale. AfD nomination by a user who seems not to understand WP:GNG and other relevant guidelines.--
578:
40:
153:
550:) and it would be slightly odd and not of value to the project to break the chain of Knowledge (XXG) articles. --
353:
209:
509:
201:
547:
425:
574:
476:
442:
57:
36:
555:
400:
349:
205:
408:
374:
328:
240:
173:
505:
485:
Your argument is invalid, we are not dealing with peerage but with almost empty useless pages. --
534:
490:
459:
421:
301:
281:
261:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
573:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
472:
438:
396:
317:
232:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Alexander Gordon, 7th
Marquess of Aberdeen and Temair
551:
404:
367:
321:
236:
223:
226:, a significant figure in the West of England, although sources need to be improved.
530:
486:
455:
297:
277:
257:
112:
204:
thus has never possessed the right to sit in the House of Lords.
567:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
522:
197:
108:
104:
100:
172:
274:
254:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
186:
294:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
581:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
292:Note: This debate has been included in the
272:Note: This debate has been included in the
252:Note: This debate has been included in the
291:
271:
251:
529:a 'great house' adds to his notability.
75:William Herbert, 18th Earl of Pembroke
67:William Herbert, 18th Earl of Pembroke
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
230:also the comment of Jimbo Wales at
200:who inherited his title after the
24:
235:of a wider series, is mistaken."
1:
318:general notability guidelines
397:general notability guideline
598:
560:10:48, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
539:19:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
514:18:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
495:10:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
481:08:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
464:23:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
61:21:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
447:03:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
430:21:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
413:20:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
382:20:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
358:19:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
336:19:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
306:16:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
286:16:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
266:16:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
245:07:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
214:15:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
570:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
395:. Just about meets the
202:House of Lords Act 1999
196:Non-notable hereditary
521:per Moonraker. This
316:. Clearly meets the
48:The result was
308:
288:
268:
54:non-admin closure
589:
572:
380:
377:
370:
334:
331:
324:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
34:
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
585:
579:deletion review
568:
401:Flaming Ferrari
375:
372:
368:
350:Flaming Ferrari
329:
326:
322:
206:Flaming Ferrari
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
584:
583:
563:
562:
541:
516:
499:
498:
497:
466:
449:
432:
415:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
361:
360:
339:
338:
310:
309:
289:
269:
248:
247:
222:, notable per
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
582:
580:
576:
571:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:WP:POLITICIAN
545:
542:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:and maintains
524:
520:
517:
515:
511:
507:
506:Peterkingiron
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
383:
378:
371:
365:
364:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
332:
325:
319:
315:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
249:
246:
242:
238:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
569:
566:
543:
526:
518:
501:
468:
451:
434:
422:ColonelHenry
417:
392:
344:
313:
227:
219:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
58:NorthAmerica
49:
47:
31:
28:
473:45ossington
439:Jimbo Wales
160:free images
552:Necrothesp
575:talk page
405:Moonraker
298:• Gene93k
278:• Gene93k
258:• Gene93k
237:Moonraker
37:talk page
577:or in a
348:notable.
119:View log
39:or in a
531:Bearian
487:Vituzzu
456:Vituzzu
345:Comment
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
452:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
369:Cindy
323:Cindy
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
556:talk
544:Keep
535:talk
523:earl
519:Keep
510:talk
502:Keep
491:talk
477:talk
469:Keep
460:talk
443:talk
435:Keep
426:talk
418:Keep
409:talk
393:Keep
376:talk
354:talk
330:talk
314:Keep
302:talk
282:talk
262:talk
241:talk
224:WP:N
220:Keep
210:talk
198:Earl
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
50:keep
188:TWL
117:– (
52:. (
558:)
537:)
512:)
493:)
479:)
462:)
445:)
428:)
411:)
356:)
320:.
304:)
296:.
284:)
276:.
264:)
256:.
243:)
228:NB
212:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
56:)
554:(
533:(
508:(
489:(
475:(
458:(
441:(
424:(
407:(
379:)
373:(
352:(
333:)
327:(
300:(
280:(
260:(
239:(
208:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.