209:
154:
Article is about a man who claims to have been wrongfully convicted of spousal rape and sentenced to an inordinate amount of prison time for it. I've searched online, but the only thing that looks like a reliable source is an account that was already the only source for the entire article (there are
163:
over New Years' 2005/2006: the four "keep" or "do not delete" votes were all either "it's helpful" or "cleanup and expand", with no valid reasons for keeping even provided. Overall, I nominate for deletion because, as the nom in the previous discussion said, the case seems unnotable and the article
182:
the POV is definitely questionable, but the make-or-break problem I see is lack of assertion of notability. Is this one of the higher-profile cases ever prosecuted relating to spousal rape? Or perhaps precedent-setting? Or the focus of a controversy or outrage? (There are few reliable sources
309:
86:
81:
187:). Of course if it's kept, the POV probably needs to be addressed. If it's "just another case", then I don't see how it's notable -- we don't have articles on every rape or murder trial in the history of the US. --
155:
two references, but they're to different pages of the same document); everything else is blogs or advocacy (spelling?) groups. I know it's not a good enough reason for deletion itself, but I should note that the
160:
76:
205:
208:, 5, 10 or 20 years after conviction. There's a Judge William Hetherington who rules on rape cases, so crafting a good query is hard, may be more relevant google hits. The
217:
147:
114:
109:
239:
118:
101:
183:
about it online, but plenty of opinion pieces). If so, then that needs to be added to the article, and it should be kept (and probably linked to from
321:
296:
278:
257:
229:
196:
173:
59:
156:
17:
105:
336:
97:
65:
36:
335:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
159:
has tried to de-orphan this article, and there's nothing to which to link it. The article was previously
252:
317:
292:
192:
169:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
246:
225:
313:
288:
275:
213:
188:
184:
165:
49:
135:
221:
271:
329:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
87:
Articles for deletion/William
Hetherington case (3rd nomination)
82:
Articles for deletion/William
Hetherington case (2nd nomination)
212:
142:
131:
127:
123:
220:. With the source in article, this seems sufficient.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
339:). No further edits should be made to this page.
77:Articles for deletion/William Hetherington case
8:
287:Hi Rex, you possibly meant 'per John Z'.
240:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
238:: This debate has been included in the
74:
7:
72:
24:
164:seems written to push an agenda.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
356:
322:19:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
297:19:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
279:18:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
258:19:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
98:William Hetherington case
66:William Hetherington case
60:20:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
332:Please do not modify it.
230:03:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
197:17:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
174:12:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
71:AfDs for this article:
210:Miami Herald article
206:6 google news hits
44:The result was
260:
243:
347:
334:
306:Keep and rewrite
268:User:Fabrictramp
255:
249:
244:
234:
145:
139:
121:
34:
355:
354:
350:
349:
348:
346:
345:
344:
343:
337:deletion review
330:
253:
247:
216:mentions it in
141:
112:
96:
93:
91:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
353:
351:
342:
341:
325:
324:
302:
301:
300:
299:
282:
281:
270:User:John Z --
261:
232:
214:Warren Farrell
199:
152:
151:
92:
90:
89:
84:
79:
73:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
352:
340:
338:
333:
327:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
303:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
259:
256:
250:
241:
237:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
198:
194:
190:
186:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
162:
158:
149:
144:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
331:
328:
305:
267:
263:
235:
201:
185:spousal rape
179:
153:
55:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
310:significant
248:Fabrictramp
161:kept in AFD
314:PhilKnight
312:coverage.
289:PhilKnight
254:talk to me
218:this book
157:Orphanage
148:View log
189:Avocado
180:Comment
166:Nyttend
115:protect
110:history
266:- per
222:John Z
204:About
143:delete
119:delete
146:) – (
136:views
128:watch
124:links
16:<
318:talk
293:talk
264:Keep
236:Note
226:talk
202:Keep
193:talk
170:talk
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
51:Sher
46:keep
276:rex
245:--
242:.
56:eth
320:)
308:-
295:)
251:|
228:)
195:)
172:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
48:.
316:(
291:(
274:-
272:T
224:(
191:(
168:(
150:)
140:(
138:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.