412:
several articles about someone who founded something contain the word "founding", is that a copyright violation? How about the articles about
Doctors Anderson, Fenske and Betzer? There is similar wording in articles about them. Are those articles copyright violations as well, or is it just that various articles about a person's professional credentials contain similar wording, and similar wording also appears in various articles about other people with similar professional backgrounds? Remove "Dr Dalton" from the quote test and based on wording in common, now we ought to be suspicious of articles about Doctors Sneed, Nathan, Anderson, Monroe, Rodriguez and Johnson. We don't really think that articles about all of these doctors are copyright violations of each other, do we? I see no evidence of a copyright violation here.
440:"His research interests include biochemical mechanisms of drug resistance and new drug discovery. He is also an expert in the biology and treatment of multiple myeloma." The article relates this as "His research interests include biochemical mechanisms of drug resistance and new drug discovery. Dr. Dalton also is an expert in the biology and treatment of multiple myeloma." Articles with such severe foundational copyright problems are unacceptable.
621:
LivingTaino, I am striking out the word "delete" from your comment above. Since you are the one who nominated this article for deletion, your "delete" !vote is already on the record, and you only get to !vote once. Of course, you can comment here as much as you like - just don't put the word "delete"
52:. No consensus about the notability issue. The copyright problems do not compel deletion as they can be resolved by reverting to a pre-copyvio version. Alessandra Napolitano, please do not remove the quotations of copyvio material in this discussion, as short quotations do not infringe on copyright.
737:
Just clicking the "news" link above gives several good sources. The book link is not very useful, many books cite his work. The
Scholar link lists 11,900 articles that reference this person's research. As an aside, it is very rare to see an AfD for a researcher with this kind of citation data, this
411:
If his name appears in two different articles about him, is that a copyright violation? If the name of his university appears in two different articles about him, is that a copyright violation? If two article about an oncologist both contain the word "oncology", is that a copyright violation? If
454:
It's extremely unfortunate that when copyright problems are gainsaid, it becomes necessary to provide excerpts from the infringing material to prove their existence. Once this discussion is closed, I intend to remove the quotations from my comment, after which revdel can be used.
376:
267:
Nominator is a new user whose only contribution to
Knowledge (XXG) after setting up an account is to nominate this article for deletion, claiming without offering any evidence that the article was created "for amusement".
516:, it may be possible to remedy the situation by reverting the article. Review of this matter is complicated by the fact that the source originally cited in the article, prior to Kickoff86's handiwork, is now a dead link.
161:
314:
432:
Of course isolated word and phrase matches aren't copyright violations. However, commonalities in phrasing, sentence structure, and the order in which facts are presented can add up to
215:
122:
658:
In any case, his notability is not based on any awards he has won, but on his heavily cited body of published work - as well as his tenure as dean of a major medical school. --
155:
292:
487:
95:
90:
716:
as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page.
99:
700:
397:
82:
17:
681:
per copyvio and close-paraphrase. With the extent of such content, I'd surmise the article should have been G12'd and not AfD'd.
176:
568:
as demonstrated by
Guillaume233. If the article is a copyvio you don't have to delete it - just rewrite it for heavens sake! --
521:
481:
460:
445:
363:
345:
433:
143:
228:
766:
40:
636:
In addition, that's a weird reason. So if someone won a Nobel, but worked in an institute where another colleague won
543:
of 58 (!). Article is badly written and any possible copyvio issues need to be addressed, but subject clearly meets
517:
456:
441:
359:
341:
137:
747:
725:
706:
667:
649:
631:
614:
593:
577:
556:
525:
464:
449:
427:
403:
367:
349:
328:
306:
283:
259:
232:
201:
64:
133:
743:
605:
He has won only as many awards as other researchers at that institution. The article reads like a resume. --
505:
721:
645:
552:
86:
475:
437:
183:
762:
739:
610:
493:
197:
36:
565:
241:
211:
192:
This is a personal page for amusement. This person is relatively unknown outside of his institution.
470:
420:
276:
252:
169:
683:
663:
627:
589:
573:
380:
149:
717:
641:
548:
324:
302:
224:
78:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
761:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
544:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
606:
193:
536:
413:
269:
245:
55:
659:
623:
585:
569:
320:
298:
219:
116:
539:
lists 279 publications that have been cited over 12,000 (!) times with an
540:
244:
as the former dean of the
University of Arizona School of Medicine.
584:
There - I wikified it, did a partial rewrite, and added sources. --
755:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
373:
Comment (re: close paraphrases to the point of copyvio concerns)
738:
person is miles ahead of most bios that are discussed here. --
315:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
469:
Since the current infringements seem to have introduced by
216:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 26
511:
499:
112:
108:
104:
640:
Nobels, the first one wouldn't be notable any more? --
168:
210:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
182:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
769:). No further edits should be made to this page.
293:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
313:Note: This debate has been included in the
291:Note: This debate has been included in the
312:
290:
535:Very prolific and influential scientist.
358:, copyright violation, explained below.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
375:Before keeping, I'd review this
1:
707:22:53, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
668:00:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
650:22:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
632:22:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
615:21:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
594:15:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
578:15:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
557:12:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
526:07:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
465:07:35, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
450:07:29, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
428:06:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
404:04:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
368:05:08, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
350:04:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
329:00:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
307:00:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
284:23:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
260:23:22, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
233:20:29, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
214:). I have transcluded it to
202:18:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
748:05:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
726:22:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
622:in front of your comment. --
65:08:56, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
786:
436:. For example, the source
758:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
564:Subject clearly passes
518:Alessandra Napolitano
457:Alessandra Napolitano
442:Alessandra Napolitano
360:Alessandra Napolitano
342:Alessandra Napolitano
208:Automated comment:
48:The result was
705:
704:
694:
691:
687:
402:
401:
391:
388:
384:
331:
318:
309:
296:
79:William S. Dalton
71:William S. Dalton
63:
777:
760:
697:
696:
689:
685:
682:
515:
488:deletedĀ contribs
434:close paraphrase
425:
423:Let's discuss it
417:
394:
393:
386:
382:
379:
319:
297:
281:
279:Let's discuss it
273:
257:
255:Let's discuss it
249:
222:
187:
186:
172:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
785:
784:
780:
779:
778:
776:
775:
774:
773:
767:deletion review
756:
703:
473:
421:
415:
400:
340:per Cullen328.
277:
271:
253:
247:
220:
129:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
783:
781:
772:
771:
752:
751:
750:
729:
728:
710:
709:
699:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
653:
652:
618:
617:
597:
596:
581:
580:
559:
537:Web of Science
530:
529:
528:
467:
452:
406:
396:
370:
353:
333:
332:
310:
287:
286:
262:
235:
190:
189:
126:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
782:
770:
768:
764:
759:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:Guillaume2303
736:
733:
732:
731:
730:
727:
723:
719:
715:
712:
711:
708:
702:
693:
680:
677:
676:
669:
665:
661:
657:
656:
655:
654:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
634:
633:
629:
625:
620:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
582:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
531:
527:
523:
519:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
492:
489:
486:
483:
480:
477:
472:
468:
466:
462:
458:
453:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
430:
429:
426:
424:
419:
418:
410:
407:
405:
399:
390:
377:
374:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
316:
311:
308:
304:
300:
294:
289:
288:
285:
282:
280:
275:
274:
266:
263:
261:
258:
256:
251:
250:
243:
239:
236:
234:
230:
226:
223:
217:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
757:
754:
734:
718:Stuartyeates
713:
678:
642:Guillaume233
637:
601:
600:
561:
549:Guillaume233
532:
508:
502:
496:
490:
484:
478:
422:
414:
408:
372:
355:
337:
336:
278:
270:
264:
254:
246:
237:
207:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
607:LivingTaino
566:WP:ACADEMIC
242:WP:ACADEMIC
194:Livingtaino
156:free images
506:blockĀ user
500:filterĀ log
58:Sandstein
763:talk page
512:blockĀ log
471:Kickoff86
321:ā¢ Gene93k
299:ā¢ Gene93k
37:talk page
765:or in a
660:MelanieN
624:MelanieN
586:MelanieN
570:MelanieN
482:contribs
123:View log
39:or in a
735:Comment
545:WP:PROF
541:h-index
265:Comment
221:Snotbot
162:WPĀ refs
150:scholar
96:protect
91:history
714:Delete
679:Delete
602:Delete
416:Cullen
378:Best,
356:Delete
272:Cullen
248:Cullen
240:Meets
212:step 3
134:Google
100:delete
686:OBERT
409:Reply
383:OBERT
177:JSTOR
138:books
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
744:talk
722:talk
690:FROM
664:talk
646:talk
628:talk
611:talk
590:talk
574:talk
562:Keep
553:talk
547:. --
533:Keep
522:talk
494:logs
476:talk
461:talk
446:talk
438:says
387:FROM
364:talk
346:talk
338:Keep
325:talk
303:talk
238:Keep
198:talk
170:FENS
144:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
638:two
231:Ā»
218:.
184:TWL
121:ā (
746:)
724:)
701:CN
692:LI
666:)
648:)
630:)
613:)
592:)
576:)
555:)
524:)
463:)
448:)
398:CN
389:LI
366:)
348:)
327:)
317:.
305:)
295:.
227:ā¢
200:)
164:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
742:(
720:(
698:/
695:|
688:M
684:R
662:(
644:(
626:(
609:(
588:(
572:(
551:(
520:(
514:)
509:Ā·
503:Ā·
497:Ā·
491:Ā·
485:Ā·
479:Ā·
474:(
459:(
444:(
395:/
392:|
385:M
381:R
362:(
344:(
323:(
301:(
229:c
225:t
196:(
188:)
180:Ā·
174:Ā·
166:Ā·
159:Ā·
153:Ā·
147:Ā·
141:Ā·
136:(
128:(
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.