Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/William Tomicki (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

755:: "I never indicated I was A Chevalier of the Legion d'Honneur. Nor would I. Never mentioned those words. That is a serious infraction. I was made a Chevalier of the de l'Ordre Des Coteaux De Champagne in Reims, France in 1994." There may be similar explanations for the "Lord Millbourne" claim. None of this is mentioned in the article nor should it be without reliable secondary sources but I think we need to be careful about jumping to conclusions about a person being "fake" without all the information. His notability is based on CREATIVE, as a writer, per previous comments above, for which secondary sources exist. So let's not attack (calling him a "fake") his credibility based on guesses and incomplete information, see 960:
with ownership of particular pieces of property, "In modern times any person may choose to use a name that is not the property of another." It is similarly vanity content--such titles are purchased either separately or along with the piece of property by people vain enough to want to use them. I have very doubts about of the objectivity of any bio here that includes such content. (and usually doubts about the notability also, because this usually implies there's nothing actually worth including)
658:
like and if there's anything I or anyone should cut to make it better, please do. Honestly, I subscribe to ENTREE and thought Bill could have a page like some other ones I've read online. When I was adding information, I used the ENTREE site bio for help. I tried to only reference what was not associated with him though. I think that part was okay, but probably my submission needed work. I clicked on the other editor's
52:. Looking at the keep votes, I'm not moved my numbers of subscribers nor number of casual mentions nor comparisons to other similar articles. WP:GNG is about sourcing and significant coverage and there is no indication this criteria has been met. As for salting, I don't see sufficient cause at this time. 959:
For what it's worth, membership in "Chevalier of the de l'Ordre Des Coteaux De Champagne" and similar drinking and dining societies is vanity content, & should never be included. "Lord of the Manor" is not a title of notability, but a archaic British designation that is in a weird way associated
907:
subject of the article might write, assuming that it is the subject (which ordinarily should be a stretch on the internet) we should look at this article on its own merits. I would suggest the article needs some editing, deal with the peacock terms and clear up statements. I'll try to do a little
982:
DGG's comment makes sense assuming AGF he knows what he is talking about. I would suggest he as an editor should remove any content he thinks is peacock or mis-characterized. Maybe he could show a source that explains these details so other can learn from it. That is why we are called editors.
657:
I saw two comments on my personal page that my article contribution was indicated for deletion. I apologize if this has caused any problems! Some of the comments on here said that I was making an autobiography about Tomicki, which was not my intention for sure. Sorry again if that's what it reads
524:
He seemed to make a concerted effort to remove the page not just a momentary lapse of judgement. Personally I agree with his assessment that he has been "under assault", though I don't believe it's a conspiracy ("forces that have aligned against me") just the nature of Knowledge (XXG)'s ruthless
714:
which would claim he has a distinction from the French Legion of Honour, which is what a Chevalier is (he's not on any of the lists I've found), and I'm not aware of the claimed Portuguese title even existing. Also, you don't buy titles in the United Kingdom unless its a fake one.
363:
William Tomicki apparently wants the page deleted (see comment below). I believe people with marginal notability like this should have the right to remove their Knowledge (XXG) page if they want. It's probably not a valid reason to !vote delete, but I am withdrawing the
709:
As a peerage geek, I highly doubt this claim of the title "Lord Millbourne" and the two supposed knighthoods, which he claims. There's nothing on the net to back any of these claims up that isn't him in an interview. The only thing that explains more is
221:
Non-notable, and the inclusion of misc. items like winning the lottery makes this into the equivalent of a self-indulgent autobiography. The books are not even in worldcat. The Chicago Tribune article is a pure press elease, and so are the others
610:. Absurd to think that publishing a travel newsletter qualifies as "CREATIVE". Most of the "references" are about the publication, and most of those aren't evenly exclusively about it, but as part of a group. There's not a solid source about him. 529:
over criticism I figured it was best to withdraw my Keep. Having a Knowledge (XXG) article is not necessarily always a good thing for someone it can be a potential liability to constantly monitor, he may have come to that conclusion as well. --
190: 89: 241: 983:
What does not make sense is the giant leap of logic that since some part of some sentence is vanity . . . so the entire article should be deleted--which is what you are proposing with the AfD Nom.
261: 143: 312: 184: 84: 281: 150: 471:
If the guy really does want his article deleted, then delete it. Was he just stressed out from the negative comments in this AFD, or did he have another reason?
309: 828: 662:
link and I think he matches these criteria for writing and creating. I'm going ahead and taking off some info to start. Let me know what else to do.
63: 830:
If this is the same house which William Tomicki says he owns ("thanks to a land acquisition in England in 2007, holds the title Lord Millcombe"
821: 526: 320: 116: 111: 869:
has recently been making edits that indicate he would like the article deleted, through Speedy Delete templates and blanking the page.
120: 17: 992: 971: 947: 929: 895: 848: 813: 789: 774: 725: 701: 682: 645: 619: 598: 566: 545: 510: 494: 466: 431: 408: 381: 350: 293: 273: 253: 233: 68: 909: 779:
His titles were mentioned in the article when I commented, which is why I raised it. He didn't explain the title Lord Millbourne.
103: 798:
was made in February based on results of the first AfD, which only discussed the Legion d'Honneur not the Lordship question. --
678: 205: 172: 916:
establishes his creation of the 30+ year institution, plus several other publications. Out of 18 sources, there are many
1013: 40: 732: 166: 912:
is a comparable site with decades less of a history. Perhaps someone should do an article about the site too.
731:
The United Kingdom's roll of the peerage seems to indicate it's fake, he's not listed and neither is the title.
888: 841: 806: 767: 559: 538: 401: 390: 374: 343: 324: 162: 666: 615: 107: 59: 1009: 863: 36: 659: 440: 305: 212: 877: 697: 643: 427: 99: 74: 670: 988: 943: 925: 881: 834: 799: 760: 674: 552: 531: 506: 422:
Vanity and autobiographical as indicated by the article creator's lack of any other contributions.
394: 367: 336: 198: 913: 629: 580: 611: 289: 269: 249: 53: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1008:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
711: 178: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
787: 743: 723: 472: 444: 904: 756: 501:.: I would suspect it was stress, considering the letters he has written, posted elsewhere. 316: 308:#3, founder and editor of ENTREE travel magazine with 12,000 subscribers and 30+ years old, 693: 640: 423: 917: 984: 939: 921: 502: 967: 823:
that it is "Lord of Millcombe". A Google search finds a manor house on the island of
229: 285: 265: 245: 137: 780: 736: 735:. Just a thing to note when considering notability since titles play into that. 716: 439:
They do mention him and his creation in various major newspapers. So he passes
591: 632:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
583:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
827:
called Millcombe and the island was once owned by lords in the 19th century.
525:
truth seeking that can be harsh and arbitrary. Given BLP and the subjects
962: 224: 824: 1002:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
242:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
874: 872: 870: 867: 831: 795: 752: 133: 129: 125: 197: 90:
Articles for deletion/William Tomicki (2nd nomination)
908:clean up shortly. That is no reason for deletion. 833:) there might be something to research further. -- 639:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 590:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 211: 938:I've added a few sources and will add a few more. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1016:). No further edits should be made to this page. 262:list of News media-related deletion discussions 8: 282:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 280:Note: This debate has been included in the 260:Note: This debate has been included in the 240:Note: This debate has been included in the 279: 259: 239: 82: 85:Articles for deletion/William Tomicki 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 866:, who claims to be William Tomicki, 81: 880:has been making similar edits. -- 24: 910:Andrew Harper's Hideaway Report 551:You're right it was stress. -- 1: 903:No matter what the possibly 1033: 327:. It was also reviewed in 993:18:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 972:16:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 948:03:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 930:03:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 896:12:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 849:14:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 814:04:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 790:03:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 775:03:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 726:16:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC) 702:03:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 683:02:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 646:01:25, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 567:21:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 546:03:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 511:03:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 495:13:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 467:13:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC) 432:10:32, 27 June 2014 (UTC) 409:21:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 382:12:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 351:02:57, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 294:17:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 274:17:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 254:17:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 234:22:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 69:02:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 1005:Please do not modify it. 620:07:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 599:01:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 311:it has been reviewed in 32:Please do not modify it. 80:AfDs for this article: 329:Travel & Leisure 733:Roll of the Peerage 876:. Another account 864:User:Freddymcgough 48:The result was 686: 669:comment added by 648: 601: 597: 296: 276: 256: 66: 1024: 1007: 893: 886: 846: 839: 811: 804: 785: 772: 765: 741: 721: 685: 663: 638: 634: 596: 594: 589: 585: 564: 557: 543: 536: 527:obvious distress 491: 488: 485: 482: 479: 476: 463: 460: 457: 454: 451: 448: 406: 399: 379: 372: 348: 341: 216: 215: 201: 153: 141: 123: 64: 34: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1014:deletion review 1003: 920:verifications. 889: 882: 878:User:SumaraLove 842: 835: 807: 800: 781: 768: 761: 753:his explanation 737: 717: 692:. Not notable. 690:Delete and salt 664: 627: 608:Delete and salt 592: 578: 560: 553: 539: 532: 489: 486: 483: 480: 477: 474: 461: 458: 455: 452: 449: 446: 402: 395: 375: 368: 344: 337: 313:Chicago Tribune 158: 149: 114: 100:William Tomicki 98: 95: 78: 75:William Tomicki 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1030: 1028: 1019: 1018: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 975: 974: 953: 952: 951: 950: 933: 932: 898: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 820:He claims here 818: 817: 816: 746: 745: 704: 687: 651: 650: 649: 636: 635: 624: 623: 622: 604: 603: 602: 587: 586: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 549: 516: 515: 514: 513: 498: 497: 434: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 385: 384: 354: 353: 298: 297: 277: 257: 219: 218: 155: 94: 93: 92: 87: 79: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1029: 1017: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1000: 994: 990: 986: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 973: 969: 965: 964: 958: 955: 954: 949: 945: 941: 937: 936: 935: 934: 931: 927: 923: 919: 915: 911: 906: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 887: 885: 879: 875: 873: 871: 868: 865: 861: 858: 857: 850: 847: 845: 840: 838: 832: 829: 826: 822: 819: 815: 812: 810: 805: 803: 797: 796:"explanation" 793: 792: 791: 788: 786: 784: 778: 777: 776: 773: 771: 766: 764: 758: 754: 750: 749: 748: 747: 744: 742: 740: 734: 730: 727: 724: 722: 720: 713: 708: 705: 703: 699: 695: 691: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 661: 656: 653: 652: 647: 644: 642: 637: 633: 631: 626: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 606: 605: 600: 595: 588: 584: 582: 577: 576: 568: 565: 563: 558: 556: 550: 548: 547: 544: 542: 537: 535: 528: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 512: 508: 504: 500: 499: 496: 493: 492: 470: 469: 468: 465: 464: 442: 438: 435: 433: 429: 425: 421: 418: 417: 410: 407: 405: 400: 398: 392: 389: 388: 387: 386: 383: 380: 378: 373: 371: 365: 362: 358: 357: 356: 355: 352: 349: 347: 342: 340: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 307: 303: 300: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 278: 275: 271: 267: 263: 258: 255: 251: 247: 243: 238: 237: 236: 235: 231: 227: 226: 214: 210: 207: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 164: 161: 160:Find sources: 156: 152: 148: 145: 139: 135: 131: 127: 122: 118: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 91: 88: 86: 83: 76: 73: 71: 70: 67: 61: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1004: 1001: 961: 956: 900: 890: 883: 862:The account 859: 843: 836: 808: 801: 782: 769: 762: 738: 728: 718: 706: 689: 665:— Preceding 654: 628: 612:Clarityfiend 607: 579: 561: 554: 540: 533: 523: 473: 445: 436: 419: 403: 396: 391:comment here 376: 369: 360: 359: 345: 338: 332: 328: 301: 223: 220: 208: 202: 194: 187: 181: 175: 169: 159: 146: 55:Dennis Brown 54: 49: 47: 31: 28: 660:WP:CREATIVE 441:WP:CREATIVE 306:WP:CREATIVE 185:free images 694:Greglocock 641:j⚛e decker 424:MiracleMat 1010:talk page 985:Trackinfo 940:Trackinfo 922:Trackinfo 914:WP:AUTHOR 671:Abrahmsii 503:Trackinfo 286:• Gene93k 266:• Gene93k 246:• Gene93k 37:talk page 1012:or in a 729:Addendum 679:contribs 667:unsigned 630:Relisted 581:Relisted 361:Withdraw 325:LA Times 321:NY Times 317:NY Times 144:View log 39:or in a 957:Comment 860:Comment 707:Comment 655:Comment 191:WP refs 179:scholar 117:protect 112:history 905:WP:COI 783:JTdale 757:WP:BLP 739:JTdale 719:JTdale 420:Delete 163:Google 121:delete 50:delete 968:talk 918:WP:RS 884:Green 837:Green 825:Lundy 802:Green 763:Green 759:. -- 593:slakr 555:Green 534:Green 490:Focus 462:Focus 443:#3. 397:Green 393:. -- 370:Green 364:Keep. 339:Green 335:. -- 333:Vogue 230:talk 206:JSTOR 167:books 151:Stats 138:views 130:watch 126:links 16:< 989:talk 944:talk 926:talk 901:Keep 794:His 751:See 712:this 698:talk 675:talk 616:talk 507:talk 437:Keep 428:talk 331:and 302:Keep 290:talk 270:talk 250:talk 199:FENS 173:news 134:logs 108:talk 104:edit 963:DGG 366:-- 304:as 225:DGG 213:TWL 142:– ( 65:WER 991:) 970:) 946:) 928:) 700:) 681:) 677:• 618:) 509:) 430:) 323:, 319:, 315:, 292:) 284:. 272:) 264:. 252:) 244:. 232:) 193:) 136:| 132:| 128:| 124:| 119:| 115:| 110:| 106:| 62:| 60:2¢ 58:| 987:( 966:( 942:( 924:( 891:C 844:C 809:C 770:C 696:( 673:( 614:( 562:C 541:C 505:( 487:m 484:a 481:e 478:r 475:D 459:m 456:a 453:e 450:r 447:D 426:( 404:C 377:C 346:C 288:( 268:( 248:( 228:( 217:) 209:· 203:· 195:· 188:· 182:· 176:· 170:· 165:( 157:( 154:) 147:· 140:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Dennis Brown

WER
02:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
William Tomicki
Articles for deletion/William Tomicki
Articles for deletion/William Tomicki (2nd nomination)
William Tomicki
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.