390:
early for WP to worry about WireDoo. As mentioned by
Alphius, the MC Hammer article already mentions WireDoo. If somebody wants to copy a missing source to MC Hammer, that would be fine, but I wouldn't mention WireDoo even at MC Hammer. (It's there, and I won't disturb it.) My sense is that WireDoo doesn't have enough weight. I don't consider Hammer a prominent voice in search engines; even if he were, he would only be one prominent proponent. I want critical notice of WireDoo -- not star-struck notice of its investor or promoter. The web has other sources such as CBS News, but none of them claim to have tried a search on WireDoo. Who are the actual developers? Hammer's vague co-founders? Management team? Financing? Serious business reporting would ask. At this point, WireDoo is just what its marketing has fed us. What is "deep search" and "relationship search"? Are we sure that Google/Bing/Yahoo cannot trivially add it? Or that users even want the features? WP should wait for sources that actually kick the tires or provide some significant insight instead of simply replaying Hammer's sound track.
335:. The article is speculative, and there's no significant claim to notability. The CNN coverage is minimal. The LA Times blog is mostly quoting Hammer, so it is not a source that is independent of WireDoo. Where the blog exercises its own judgment, it is skeptical that WireDoo will succeed, so it is not suggesting notability. Celebrity endorsements do not make companies notable.
353:
With two reliable sources, even if we felt it wasn't notable enough for a stand alone article, wouldn't we normally merge the content somewhere rather than delete? Even with the quoting of Hammer, the LA Times still felt it was important enough to dedicate some space for the article, as did CNN. As
389:
This article, which is only three sentences, isn't hard to recreate and should be deleted. The issue is not a reliable publisher but rather independent, reliable, secondary sources; there are none. Although it could be redirected/merged into MC Hammer, I voted for a straight delete because it's too
413:
to MC Hammer. There is already a sentence about it on the article about him, using one of the sources here. The part about WireDoo in his article could just be slightly expanded and the other source could be added. This page could be redirected to
362:
solution. At least with merge and redirect, if someone looked for the term, they would find something in the MC Hammer article. That seems like a reasonable compromise, and the article can be recreated when and if it
208:
A famous person announcing their intention to do something does not establish notability. We generally don't write about things that are in the planning stages but don't exist yet, because many never materialize.
177:
269:- I agree that it is weak, in alpha stage, not open to the public, and may never come to fruition, but when CNN and the LA Times cover it and do so in a significant way, it seems to be notable.
132:
241:
171:
137:
378:
280:
17:
68:
446:
40:
192:
105:
100:
159:
109:
92:
323:
306:
224:
373:
275:
153:
442:
36:
298:
294:
149:
185:
427:
399:
344:
327:
310:
285:
255:
233:
74:
319:
302:
210:
56:
199:
423:
368:
270:
251:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
395:
340:
165:
63:
55:. Consensus is to merge - Deleting and Redirecting to existing info in host article (
419:
247:
96:
126:
415:
391:
336:
51:
88:
80:
435:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
122:
118:
114:
184:
198:
358:weak, but I can't see an outright deletion as the
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
318:to MC Hammer. This has 2 reliable sources. --
242:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
240:Note: This debate has been included in the
301:of an announcement of an upcoming product.
239:
416:MC Hammer#Additional business ventures
52:MC Hammer#Additional business ventures
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
418:until there is more information.
1:
466:
428:15:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
400:02:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
345:19:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
328:14:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
311:07:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
286:01:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
256:01:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
234:21:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
75:12:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
438:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
293:Knowledge (XXG) is
48:The result was
381:
376:
283:
278:
267:Merge per Alphius
258:
245:
231:
457:
440:
379:
374:
371:
367:passes WP:GNG.
299:routine coverage
281:
276:
273:
246:
230:
225:
222:
203:
202:
188:
140:
130:
112:
71:
67:
59:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
436:
369:
297:. This is just
271:
226:
219:
215:
211:
145:
136:
103:
87:
84:
69:
61:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
431:
430:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
384:
383:
348:
347:
330:
313:
288:
260:
259:
217:
213:
206:
205:
142:
83:
78:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
444:
439:
433:
432:
429:
425:
421:
417:
412:
409:
408:
401:
397:
393:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
377:
372:
366:
361:
357:
354:I stated, it
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
320:Colapeninsula
317:
314:
312:
308:
304:
303:duffbeerforme
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
284:
279:
274:
268:
266:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
243:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
229:
223:
221:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
82:
79:
77:
76:
72:
66:
65:
60:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
437:
434:
410:
370:Dennis Brown
364:
359:
355:
332:
315:
295:not the news
290:
272:Dennis Brown
264:
263:
227:
212:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
62:
49:
47:
31:
28:
172:free images
443:talk page
380:(contrib)
282:(contrib)
248:ā¢ Gene93k
50:merge to
37:talk page
445:or in a
133:View log
64:BWilkins
39:or in a
420:Alphius
365:clearly
220:anguard
178:WPĀ refs
166:scholar
106:protect
101:history
89:WireDoo
81:WireDoo
375:(talk)
333:Delete
291:Delete
277:(talk)
150:Google
110:delete
70:ātrack
411:Merge
316:Merge
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
127:views
119:watch
115:links
58:talkā
16:<
424:talk
396:talk
392:Glrx
360:best
341:talk
337:Glrx
324:talk
307:talk
265:Keep
252:talk
228:Wha?
216:ven
186:FENS
160:news
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
200:TWL
135:ā¢
131:ā (
426:)
398:)
356:is
343:)
326:)
309:)
254:)
244:.
180:)
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
73:)
422:(
394:(
339:(
322:(
305:(
250:(
218:M
214:S
204:)
196:Ā·
190:Ā·
182:Ā·
175:Ā·
169:Ā·
163:Ā·
157:Ā·
152:(
144:(
141:)
129:)
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.