393:
Though I wouldn't be surprised if some names are missing, I'm curious where you come up with that number. The WWE website only provides results for about a half-dozen matches per year. (I'll admit that I don't really follow wrestling, so if your number is correct, I'll vote delete.)
358:- No it can not, for one because the list is incomplete and the list can go on and on, do you know how many people have wrestled at 'Mania? Over 100,000. This will just make the article longer and the information would just be trivial. Citing
283:. It seems fair to list all the wrestlers who have competed at the event, along with their relative levels of success there. That's not what I'd call "cruft"; that's just basic, useful information. (Of course, some sources would be good.)
336:
May be trivial, but it could very well enhance the
Wrestlemania article. The article itself is infact very pointless, but as a section in a larger article, it would probably, as I said before, help the article.
324:- no need to lose the existing work. Maybe cut out those with less than five matches for space. Not cruft, is actually rather useful, discriminate, and tailored to a particular set of information.
118:
184:
85:
80:
417:
I doubt we really need an article about wins and losses. If we did, we would need a list of that for every major sport and event. So, I say it's best if the article is
89:
72:
207:
17:
445:
403:
388:
346:
328:
310:
292:
267:
250:
215:
172:
146:
54:
76:
460:
36:
199:
68:
60:
437:
459:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
363:
225:
263:
191:
430:
342:
338:
306:
302:
423:
359:
399:
381:
288:
243:
140:
168:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
259:
395:
375:
284:
237:
128:
325:
321:
280:
161:
156:
49:
106:
369:
231:
453:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
275:
Assuming the list is complete and accurate, I see no reason why
301:
The dude makes a wicked point, if it can be sourced, merge it.
279:
to keep this around, either at its own article or as part of
113:
102:
98:
94:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
463:). No further edits should be made to this page.
185:list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions
8:
183:: This debate has been included in the
421:. Merging won't do much good anyway.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
224:- no need for merge, information is
24:
125:Trivial page that is not needed.
446:03:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
404:20:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
389:20:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
347:21:46, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
329:20:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
311:21:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
293:16:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
268:14:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
251:14:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
216:14:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
173:12:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
147:12:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
55:23:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
69:Wrestlemania win loss records
61:Wrestlemania win loss records
480:
356:Disagree with Merge votes
456:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
218:
188:
53:
471:
458:
444:
442:
435:
428:
384:
378:
372:
246:
240:
234:
212:
204:
196:
189:
179:
164:
145:
137:
134:
131:
116:
110:
92:
52:
34:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
470:
469:
468:
467:
461:deletion review
454:
438:
431:
424:
422:
382:
380:
376:
370:
244:
242:
238:
232:
208:
200:
192:
162:
135:
132:
129:
126:
112:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
477:
475:
466:
465:
449:
448:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
374:
350:
349:
331:
315:
314:
313:
270:
253:
236:
219:
177:
175:
123:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
476:
464:
462:
457:
451:
450:
447:
443:
441:
436:
434:
429:
427:
420:
416:
413:
412:
405:
402:
401:
397:
392:
391:
390:
387:
386:
385:
379:
373:
365:
361:
357:
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
335:
332:
330:
327:
323:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
294:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
252:
249:
248:
247:
241:
235:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
211:
205:
203:
197:
195:
186:
182:
178:
176:
174:
170:
166:
165:
158:
154:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
142:
138:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
455:
452:
439:
432:
425:
418:
414:
398:
368:
367:
364:WP:LISTCRUFT
355:
334:Strong Merge
333:
322:Wrestlemania
317:
298:
287:
281:Wrestlemania
276:
272:
255:
230:
229:
221:
209:
201:
193:
180:
160:
157:Wrestlemania
152:
127:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
260:Gavyn Sykes
339:Altenhofen
303:Altenhofen
226:List Cruft
360:WP:TRIVIA
258:per SRX.
159:article.
155:into the
396:Zagalejo
285:Zagalejo
119:View log
426:SAVIOR_
419:deleted
415:Comment
273:Comment
202:Vampire
163:Lugnuts
86:protect
81:history
299:Coment
256:Delete
222:Delete
114:delete
90:delete
46:delete
320:into
318:Merge
210:Heart
153:Merge
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
440:.777
433:SELF
362:and
343:talk
307:talk
264:talk
194:Nici
181:Note
169:talk
141:talk
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
400:^^^
326:Stu
289:^^^
277:not
228:.--
187:.
133:tth
130:iMa
366:--
345:)
309:)
295:,
266:)
214:♥
190:—♥
171:)
136:ew
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
50:BJ
48:.
383:X
377:R
371:S
341:(
305:(
262:(
245:X
239:R
233:S
206:♥
198:♥
167:(
143:)
139:(
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.