346:
Sorry I wasn't clear: I am not saying it is even likely to be a copyvio. However, assuming that it is not, then the material is OR. It could be argued that (wherever the source is, a video?) the article content is sufficiently rephrased for it to not be a copyvio, but it has to be essentially a
151:
446:- In-house product of TWC. Definitely a neat measurement scale, but not nearly notable enough for its own article. If it begins to see some usage outside of TWC then, and only then, should it be recreated
372:
due to the tenuous assertion of notability, but since it's already here, let's not do that. The only external non-TWC sources that refer to this scale are blogs and forums (which fail
376:), and there are no peer-refereed publications that even mention it. The article creator also made several redirects pointing to this page that ought to be nuked alongside this page.
112:
464:
145:
182:
This is a non-notable, non-governmental "unofficial" scale created and used only by The
Weather Channel (TWC). It is rarely, if ever, used outside that program.
425:
268:
243:
280:- I don't know about notability but I'm pretty sure that this page does not belong. Its title is a bad one for starters. Also blatantly fails
423:: The definition and description of an acronym/phrase (only used by one particular commercial entity not, in widespread use elsewhere),
17:
208:
as it is an officially unrecognized feature applied exclusively within one network. Specifically violates criterion 4 of the
166:
531:
36:
409:
335:
133:
85:
80:
264:
239:
89:
530:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
72:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
209:
205:
127:
495:
218:
292:
260:
235:
325:
I searched, and cannot find any evidence of it being a copyvio. On what basis do you suspect this? ---
285:
123:
434:
52:
159:
516:
499:
479:
455:
438:
415:
383:
369:
356:
341:
320:
295:
272:
247:
225:
195:
76:
54:
512:
352:
316:
189:
173:
491:
475:
213:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
68:
60:
451:
289:
281:
231:
430:
405:
331:
49:
396:
373:
308:
139:
392:
304:
508:
348:
312:
184:
471:
106:
447:
377:
490:
as non-notable, as this appears to be unused in the actual weather community.
400:
326:
368:. Not notable. A trigger-happy admin could probably try to delete this under
307:
and is either a copyvio (being a reprint of details from some source), or is
347:
paraphrase of someone's content with no encyclopedic value added.
524:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
102:
98:
94:
158:
395:, specifically in that the only sources either fail
172:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
534:). No further edits should be made to this page.
399:, or are not independent of the subject. ---
8:
465:list of Science-related deletion discussions
463:Note: This debate has been included in the
462:
204:as per OP's reasoning. It does not meet
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
426:Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
24:
259:, fails notability guidelines.
1:
429:seems to apply in this case.
210:general notability guideline
551:
517:07:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
500:18:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
480:16:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
456:13:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
230:This does not qualify for
55:16:01, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
439:14:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
416:04:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
384:03:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
357:04:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
342:03:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
321:03:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
296:03:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
273:03:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
248:03:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
226:03:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
196:03:04, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
527:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
391:- appears to fail
44:The result was
482:
468:
413:
339:
309:original research
542:
529:
469:
403:
381:
329:
261:Strange Passerby
236:Strange Passerby
222:
216:
192:
187:
177:
176:
162:
110:
92:
34:
550:
549:
545:
544:
543:
541:
540:
539:
538:
532:deletion review
525:
379:
303:No evidence of
232:speedy deletion
223:
220:
214:
190:
185:
119:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
548:
546:
537:
536:
520:
519:
502:
484:
483:
459:
458:
441:
418:
386:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
298:
275:
253:
252:
251:
250:
219:
180:
179:
116:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
547:
535:
533:
528:
522:
521:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
466:
461:
460:
457:
453:
449:
445:
442:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
422:
419:
417:
411:
407:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
385:
382:
375:
371:
367:
364:
358:
354:
350:
345:
344:
343:
337:
333:
328:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
254:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
224:
217:
211:
207:
203:
202:Speedy delete
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
193:
188:
175:
171:
168:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
129:
125:
122:
121:Find sources:
117:
114:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
526:
523:
504:
492:MikeWazowski
487:
443:
424:
420:
388:
365:
300:
277:
256:
234:in any way.
201:
183:
181:
169:
163:
155:
148:
142:
136:
130:
120:
45:
43:
31:
28:
290:Jasper Deng
286:WP:NOTHOWTO
146:free images
431:Shearonink
305:notability
50:joe decker
507:per nom.
472:• Gene93k
509:Inks.LWC
410:contribs
349:Johnuniq
336:contribs
313:Johnuniq
215:★ Auree
113:View log
152:WP refs
140:scholar
86:protect
81:history
69:TOR:CON
61:TOR:CON
505:Delete
488:Delete
448:Carson
444:Delete
421:Delete
389:Delete
370:CSD A7
366:Delete
301:Delete
293:(talk)
282:WP:MOS
278:Delete
257:Delete
186:Darren
124:Google
90:delete
46:delete
401:Barek
397:WP:RS
374:WP:RS
327:Barek
167:JSTOR
128:books
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
513:talk
496:talk
476:talk
452:talk
435:talk
406:talk
393:WP:N
378:Tito
353:talk
332:talk
317:talk
284:and
269:cont
265:talk
244:cont
240:talk
221:talk
206:WP:N
160:FENS
134:news
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
174:TWL
111:– (
515:)
498:)
478:)
470:—
467:.
454:)
437:)
414:-
408:•
380:xd
355:)
340:-
334:•
319:)
311:.
288:.
271:)
267:•
246:)
242:•
212:.
191:23
154:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
48:.
511:(
494:(
474:(
450:(
433:(
412:)
404:(
351:(
338:)
330:(
315:(
263:(
238:(
178:)
170:·
164:·
156:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
131:·
126:(
118:(
115:)
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.