407:
to your recommended list? "TV Single Dads" is not the most unusual search term and it is certainly relevant to what that list would contain. Also please consider when nominating articles for deletion under "No original research" whether the article can be made to exist as a valid entry with no
212:
Could be, but the current article doesn't even have a list of that sort that could be moved (and a category would better serve the purpose, I think).
192:
17:
409:
498:
36:
376:
to something along the lines of "List of television shows featuring single fathers", and the current one deleted with
347:
any more than any other list, and there's plenty of lists on Wiki, all of which require gathering the information.
497:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
458:
Well, it seems as if, in a strange convoluted way, this is actually an example of successful collaboration!
480:
462:
449:
416:
394:
351:
338:
323:
311:
295:
268:
207:
82:
52:
284:
226:
221:
160:
155:
112:
107:
292:
289:
281:
443:
388:
76:
404:
216:
150:
102:
58:
477:
49:
438:
383:
143:
71:
264:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
413:
204:
344:
332:
304:
277:
95:
319:
Seems as viable as many other things on Wiki. I've taken out intro to reduce it to facts.
459:
348:
335:
320:
428:
the article as it was in the first place had no list but was just a commentary. See
260:
431:. The list was added later by different editors. Also agree to redirect, it's not
200:
412:) but in cases like this OR is a reason to fix the article, not delete it. —
308:
240:
174:
170:
126:
196:
236:
122:
476:
in its current form it's an obvious keeper and violates no WP stds.
94:, agree with nom. For the creator, if he comes here, please read
491:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
408:
original research. Sometimes this is not the case (for instance
243:
177:
129:
403:
per my original comment and revised nom. Nom: why not redirect
247:
181:
133:
203:
come to mind as shows that revolved around that premise.
429:
370:
367:
48:, but it looks like deletion isn't need anymore now.
193:
List of television characters who are single fathers
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
501:). No further edits should be made to this page.
191:I think this could be interesting and useful as
366:the article I nominated for deletion. Compare
8:
410:List of the best-tasting ice cream flavors
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
372:. I hereby recommend the article is
343:I can't see how a list like this is
24:
1:
362:the list as it stands now is
44:The result of the debate was
518:
481:22:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
463:01:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
450:00:24, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
417:00:01, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
395:23:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
352:23:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
339:22:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
324:17:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
312:12:15, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
296:11:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
269:06:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
208:04:04, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
195:or something of the like.
83:03:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
494:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
53:03:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
65:Original research
448:
393:
81:
509:
496:
436:
381:
287:
250:
232:
229:
224:
219:
184:
166:
163:
158:
153:
136:
118:
115:
110:
105:
69:
34:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
508:
507:
506:
505:
499:deletion review
492:
447:
392:
285:
234:
227:
222:
217:
213:
168:
161:
156:
151:
147:
120:
113:
108:
103:
99:
80:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
515:
513:
504:
503:
486:
484:
483:
478:Carlossuarez46
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
453:
452:
441:
420:
419:
405:TV Single Dads
386:
357:
356:
355:
354:
326:
314:
298:
271:
254:
253:
252:
186:
74:
61:
59:TV Single Dads
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
514:
502:
500:
495:
489:
488:
487:
482:
479:
475:
472:
471:
464:
461:
457:
456:
455:
454:
451:
445:
440:
434:
430:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
418:
415:
411:
406:
402:
399:
398:
397:
396:
390:
385:
379:
375:
371:
368:
365:
361:
353:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
337:
334:
330:
327:
325:
322:
318:
315:
313:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
294:
291:
288:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
251:
249:
245:
242:
238:
231:
230:
225:
220:
211:
210:
209:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
185:
183:
179:
176:
172:
165:
164:
159:
154:
145:
141:
138:
137:
135:
131:
128:
124:
117:
116:
111:
106:
97:
93:
89:
88:
87:
86:(See below.)
85:
84:
78:
73:
68:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
493:
490:
485:
473:
432:
425:
400:
377:
373:
363:
359:
358:
328:
316:
300:
273:
256:
233:
215:
188:
167:
149:
139:
119:
101:
91:
90:
66:
64:
63:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
435:unusual ;)
378:no redirect
201:Full House
144:User:Porge
305:per above
142:now, per
460:Tyrenius
401:Redirect
349:Tyrenius
336:Beno1000
321:Tyrenius
246:@ 04:23
241:28 April
180:@ 03:05
175:29 April
171:Saturday
132:@ 04:03
127:28 April
426:Comment
261:Deville
259:, OR --
197:Blossom
189:Comment
146:below.
439:porges
384:porges
333:WP:NOR
329:Delete
301:Delete
278:WP:NOR
274:Delete
257:Delete
237:Friday
123:Friday
96:WP:NOR
92:Delete
72:porges
67:delete
374:moved
360:Note:
293:e Ong
218:Cuivi
152:Cuivi
104:Cuivi
16:<
474:Keep
444:talk
433:that
389:talk
369:and
331:Per
317:Keep
280:. --
265:Talk
244:2006
199:and
178:2006
140:Move
130:2006
77:talk
364:not
309:PJM
282:Ter
248:UTC
228:nen
182:UTC
162:nen
134:UTC
114:nen
414:GT
380:.
345:OR
307:.
303:,
290:nc
276:,
267:)
239:,
235:,
205:GT
173:,
169:,
125:,
121:,
98:.
446:)
442:(
437:—
391:)
387:(
382:—
286:e
263:(
223:é
214:—
157:é
148:—
109:é
100:—
79:)
75:(
70:—
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.