191:
This article has only one source and it's not independent. The martial art claims to go back 850 years, but the only evidence is a claim by the art's founder/reviver since the 1960s that he has a manuscript that is that ancient that describes the martial art. Except for the longevity claim, there
160:
248:
289:
There seem to be enough sources to indicate notability. However, entire sections of the article (like the ones on the manuscript and techniqes) have no sources and should either be sourced or deleted.
198:
121:
154:
249:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Togakure-ryu&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=ws
225:
192:
is nothing else that shows this is a notable martial art and there are no independent sources that show this art has an 800 year history.
94:
89:
98:
17:
81:
175:
142:
226:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Togakure-ryū&hl=en&prmd=ivns&biw=1280&bih=664&um=1&tbo=u&tbm=bks
314:
36:
136:
313:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
299:
279:
263:
237:
213:
63:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
270:
I am not convinced that these are reliable, third-party references - they are too close to the subject field.
132:
182:
252:
85:
228:
shows that the term has been referenced in many books and magazines. Seems to be notable enough. --
168:
295:
148:
233:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
275:
209:
77:
69:
291:
229:
49:
115:
271:
205:
247:
There are numerous references on Google
Scholar that indicate notability. See
307:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111:
107:
103:
167:
181:
199:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
317:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
222:Keep, but improve refs and work towards NPOV
197:Note: This debate has been included in the
196:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
300:03:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
280:18:55, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
264:23:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
238:06:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
214:04:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
64:08:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
334:
310:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
262:
216:
202:
325:
312:
260:
259:
256:
251:
203:
186:
185:
171:
119:
101:
53:
34:
333:
332:
328:
327:
326:
324:
323:
322:
321:
315:deletion review
308:
257:
254:
253:
128:
92:
76:
73:
60:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
331:
329:
320:
319:
303:
302:
283:
282:
267:
266:
241:
240:
218:
217:
189:
188:
125:
72:
67:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
330:
318:
316:
311:
305:
304:
301:
297:
293:
288:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
265:
261:
250:
246:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
200:
195:
194:
193:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
309:
306:
286:
244:
221:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
78:Togakure-ryū
70:Togakure-ryū
57:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
155:free images
52:Wifione
258:anomhmata
292:Papaursa
122:View log
230:Slashme
161:WP refs
149:scholar
95:protect
90:history
59:.......
255:Nipson
206:Jakejr
133:Google
99:delete
176:JSTOR
137:books
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
296:talk
287:Keep
276:talk
272:jmcw
245:Keep
234:talk
210:talk
169:FENS
143:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
46:keep
183:TWL
120:– (
298:)
278:)
236:)
224::
212:)
201:.
163:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
294:(
274:(
232:(
208:(
204:—
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.