335:
could be related to Tokyo through popular culture -- locations, people, cuisine, historical events, politics, etc. Without the lack of criteria, editors can add and remove any entry as they please, making this topic far too subjective and indiscriminate. It would be far more beneficial to narrow
220:
I believe this type of article has potential only if this kind of thing has been observed by a good reference. I am sure that there is an interesting text to be found about how Tokyo is represented in popular culture and that it could be used as a reference. In fact, I would tend to vote keep in
197:
that these "in popular culture" articles are encyclopedic and I have been working to improve a variety of them. Appearances of cities in popular culure influence the tourism of the area and so there is a real research interest in knowing how popular particular cities are and how accurate the
301:" The list shows fictional representations of Tokyo which are "associated with" and have "significantly contributed" to the the popular cultural conception of Tokyo (which is the topic of this article), and thus meets the criteria to not be a
173:
notable even if the subject being mentioned is itself notable. This list is dominated by
Japanese media mentioning Tokyo — mentions of Tokyo in such are not in any way an interesting phenomenon. /
121:
128:
Knowledge (XXG) isn't a directory, and isn't a trivia collection. Some relevant (and important) information should be put in the Tokyo article, and leave it at that.
148:
198:
fictional depictions of these citites are. Plus, we clearly are shifting in a keep or no consensus mindset over these types of articles lately anyway:
202:
94:
89:
221:
hopes that such references are found, but the current article is nothing more than a collection of links, and that does not make it a real article.
98:
81:
387:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Nothing here is relevant; it's just a gigantic trivia section for the
17:
206:
238:
per
Edgarde. The topic is far, far too broad to be coherent in this Knowledge (XXG) article. There could be prose articles like
193:
as it is a discriminate list that demonstrates Tokyo's notability by indicating its influence and use in popular culture. I feel
279:
which was also nominated, which I also argued to keep. If someone wants to improve this article, a good reliable source would be
56:
239:
289:. Tokyo as a fictional setting has been commented on by enough reliable sources that the topic is clearly notable (and who
243:
181:
169:
Lists of times a thing is mentioned in TV, movies, and cartoons do not belong in an encyclopedia. Such mentions are not
416:
36:
398:
379:
353:
349:
322:
263:
259:
230:
212:
185:
160:
137:
63:
226:
85:
415:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
250:
topics that happen to be Tokyo-originated. The existence itself hardly depicts its placement in pop culture. —
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
310:
276:
396:
297:
destroying Tokyo somewhere in their brains)?. The list is not "trivia", it avoids trivia by stating "
222:
77:
69:
133:
247:
370:
365:- but prose-ify(?). The current format invites unencyclopedic additions. The Article needs to
318:
281:
178:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
306:
302:
392:
53:
345:
255:
155:
129:
314:
286:
174:
115:
341:
251:
294:
48:
However I will note that no good reason has been given to maintain the
309:, which are the only types of "indiscriminate information" which have
388:
305:. This article doesn't fit any of the types of articles listed as
409:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
299:
A title with just a brief episode in the city is not listed.
331:"Popular culture", by definition, is extremely broad.
282:
Dawn to the West: Japanese
Literature of the Modern Era
199:
194:
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
240:Cultural depictions of Tokyo in literature
52:but the article is now more than a list.
246:, et cetera, but this is just a list of
147:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
244:Cultural depictions of Tokyo in film
369:stuff, more than just list stuff.
24:
336:the scope, as I mentioned in my
149:list of Japan-related deletions
1:
323:03:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
264:15:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
231:19:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
213:19:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
186:11:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
161:02:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
138:18:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
399:15:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
380:10:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
354:15:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
208:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
64:15:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
303:loose association of topics
436:
307:indiscriminate information
412:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
78:Tokyo in pop culture
70:Tokyo in pop culture
293:have the image of
277:Atlanta in fiction
378:
377:
184:
163:
152:
427:
414:
376:
375:
373:
340:comment above. —
211:
209:
177:
158:
153:
143:
119:
101:
61:
34:
435:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
425:
424:
423:
417:deletion review
410:
371:
313:for exclusion.
223:Youkai no unmei
207:
205:
156:
92:
76:
73:
57:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
433:
431:
422:
421:
404:
402:
401:
391:page. Sorry.--
382:
359:
358:
357:
356:
326:
325:
266:
248:indiscriminate
233:
215:
188:
164:
126:
125:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
432:
420:
418:
413:
407:
406:
405:
400:
397:
394:
390:
386:
383:
381:
374:
368:
364:
361:
360:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
278:
274:
270:
267:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
234:
232:
228:
224:
219:
216:
214:
210:
203:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
60:
55:
51:
47:
46:no consensus.
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
411:
408:
403:
384:
372:Exit2DOS2000
366:
362:
337:
332:
298:
290:
287:Donald Keene
280:
275:better than
272:
268:
235:
217:
190:
170:
166:
144:
127:
58:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
204:. Best, --
393:CastAStone
271:. This is
171:ipso facto
311:consensus
333:Anything
295:Godzilla
195:strongly
130:RobJ1981
122:View log
367:explain
350:contrib
315:DHowell
291:doesn't
260:contrib
218:Comment
95:protect
90:history
385:Delete
236:Delete
167:Delete
99:delete
389:Tokyo
116:views
108:watch
104:links
59:juice
54:Mango
16:<
363:Keep
352:) -
346:talk
342:Erik
338:Keep
319:talk
273:much
269:Keep
262:) -
256:talk
252:Erik
227:talk
201:and
191:Keep
154:—···
145:Note
134:talk
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
50:list
285:by
175:edg
157:日本穣
151:.
120:– (
348:•
321:)
258:•
242:,
229:)
136:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
395:|
344:(
317:(
254:(
225:(
182:☭
179:☺
132:(
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.