187:
standard is "Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage". For the number of years in office, I don't see adequate evidence of sigificant press coverage, especially coverage beyond the local area.
111:
candidate for mayor and a more-or-less nn local councillor (with no outside claim to notability) doesn't meet WP:BIO. Finally, per the consensus at
91:
I realize this particular entry is borderline, and I wouldn't have created the page at all had it not been for his mayoral run. I'm going to vote
17:
221:
204:
192:
175:
152:
132:
119:
99:
86:
73:
57:
36:
200:
Tom Murray is a very well-known municipal figure in
Hamilton, and has received extensive press coverage in the area.
82:
Not sure whether this affects notability, but he was also a (poorly supported) candidate for mayor of
Hamilton.
220:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
63:
160:
Hamilton is a very notable city, well known in Canada. Any local alderman would be notable enough to keep. -
170:
166:
149:
52:
161:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
145:
112:
184:
83:
70:
49:
201:
96:
189:
129:
116:
107:
Doesn't seem to be notable beyond the fact that he was controversial. Being a
115:, local councillors aren't notable by virtue of their position alone. --
144:. Both aldermen and mayoral candidates of major cities are notable. --
214:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
95:, but will accept the results one way or the other.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
224:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
128:Vaughan isn't a major city. Hamilton is.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
205:22:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
193:21:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
176:04:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
153:04:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
133:03:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
120:04:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
100:23:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
87:16:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
74:15:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
58:11:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
241:
69:an alderman, nothing more
217:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
64:Tom Murray (politician)
174:
55:
232:
219:
164:
53:
48:(no consensus).
34:
240:
239:
235:
234:
233:
231:
230:
229:
228:
222:deletion review
215:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
238:
236:
227:
226:
210:
209:
208:
207:
178:
155:
138:
137:
136:
135:
123:
122:
102:
89:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
237:
225:
223:
218:
212:
211:
206:
203:
199:
196:
195:
194:
191:
186:
183:The relevant
182:
179:
177:
172:
168:
163:
159:
156:
154:
151:
147:
143:
140:
139:
134:
131:
127:
126:
125:
124:
121:
118:
114:
110:
106:
103:
101:
98:
94:
90:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
76:
75:
72:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
216:
213:
197:
180:
162:Royalguard11
157:
141:
108:
104:
92:
79:
68:
45:
43:
31:
28:
146:Earl Andrew
84:JASpencer
71:Mayumashu
50:Sjakkalle
202:CJCurrie
97:CJCurrie
54:(Check!)
198:Comment
190:GRBerry
130:Bearcat
113:Vaughan
80:Comment
185:WP:BIO
181:Delete
117:Chabuk
109:failed
105:Delete
16:<
171:Desk
167:Talk
158:Keep
150:talk
142:Keep
93:keep
46:keep
148:-
173:)
169:·
165:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.