544:: "Leaders of registered political parties at the national or major sub-national level are usually considered notable regardless of that party's degree of electoral success." Hoefling is national chairman of a registered national level party. If that does not make him a "leader" of that party, then what does? Also, a de facto consensus seems to have emerged over the past several years that being a presidential nominee - particularly one attaining any degree of confirmed ballot status in the general election - of a notable party denotes notability.--
583:
national chairman of a party which has fielded candidates who have appeared on multiple state ballots (thus making it a "national level party") which would seem to denote notability based on the statement I quoted from WP:POLOUTCOMES. Note also that while third parties are not specifically mentioned in WP:POLITICIAN, they are not specifically excluded either.--
582:
I base that assertion on several afd discussions which have taken place in recent years regarding presidential nominees, virtually all of which resulted in "Keep" based largely on the fact that the candidate was nominee of a national party and qualified for at least one ballot. Besides, Hoefling is a
480:
beyond a particular election, a redirect to a page about the particular election for candidates for national office or significant subnational offices is an appropriate action. Any information in the article can be merged or incorporated into the main election-related article (in this case United
562:
If so, that's news to me, and I've been off and on at AFD for the past 5 years. I believe there's no such consensus, which is why WP:POLITICIAN makes no mention of leaders of third parties. They're notable if there is significant coverage of them in secondary sources independent of the subject.
501:
It appears that every other
Presidential candidate that qualified for the ballot in 2012 in multiple states has its own page. A keep at this point would be consistent. In general, I do think redirects are appropriate for losing candidates.
469:
352:
606:
not only was
Hoefling on the ballot in multiple states in 2012, if write-in access is counted, he theoretically could have won the election. Furthermore, I agree completely with JayJasper and base this "vote" on his
178:
402:
subject is notable based on coverage received combined with the fact of his being a ballot-qualified presidential candiate as well as founder and national chair of a national political party.--
257:
417:
288:
131:
172:
226:
77:
624:. He's notable enough. He won nearly as many votes as Rocky Anderson and is chairman of a political party that has a decent sized wiki article. - ngfan1
138:
104:
99:
108:
17:
193:
91:
334:
Presidential nominee who appeared on several ballots in 2012 election. Also has been written about in reliable sources.--
160:
612:
451:
442:
about himself. Just because the subject founded a political party does not make the subject automatically notable per
388:
305:
274:
243:
641:
371:. That being said the subject received the majority of that coverage due to a single event, and thus falls under
40:
154:
435:
News and book searches bring up no reliable sources for the subject of this AfD, where the subject receives
608:
473:
447:
443:
384:
150:
637:
616:
592:
573:
553:
541:
533:
511:
455:
429:
380:
343:
326:
311:
280:
249:
218:
214:
61:
57:
36:
376:
200:
588:
549:
210:
186:
470:
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2012#American
Independent Party
353:
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2012#American
Independent Party
571:
531:
407:
339:
507:
486:
436:
425:
95:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
636:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
439:
368:
356:
53:
372:
166:
584:
545:
300:
269:
238:
565:
525:
477:
403:
364:
335:
503:
482:
421:
360:
87:
67:
125:
323:
363:
therefore it can be said that the subject has passed notability as defined by
293:
262:
231:
322:
no deletion rationale. "Very non-notable" is not a valid rationale.--
481:
States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2012).
630:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
121:
117:
113:
185:
476:. Unless a losing candidate passes notability under
258:list of United States-related deletion discussions
418:list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
644:). No further edits should be made to this page.
289:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
227:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
199:
8:
416:Note: This debate has been included in the
287:Note: This debate has been included in the
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
415:
286:
255:
224:
75:
7:
74:
78:Articles for deletion/Tom Hoefling
24:
375:. Furthermore, the subject fails
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
355:. Subject has received some
395:20:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
383:a redirect is prescribed.--
661:
456:14:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
430:23:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
344:15:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
327:10:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
312:08:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
281:08:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
250:08:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
219:07:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
633:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
617:22:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
593:17:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
574:17:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
554:17:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
534:12:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
512:18:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
489:) 04:02, 29 April 2013
62:15:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
73:AfDs for this article:
440:significant coverage
357:significant coverage
570:
530:
48:The result was
609:William S. Saturn
564:
524:
474:RightCowLeftCoast
448:RightCowLeftCoast
432:
385:RightCowLeftCoast
359:from non-primary
314:
283:
252:
209:Very non-notable
652:
635:
568:
528:
379:. Therefore per
361:reliable sources
310:
308:
303:
298:
279:
277:
272:
267:
248:
246:
241:
236:
204:
203:
189:
141:
129:
111:
34:
660:
659:
655:
654:
653:
651:
650:
649:
648:
642:deletion review
631:
566:
526:
490:
444:WP:NOTINHERITED
306:
301:
294:
292:
275:
270:
263:
261:
244:
239:
232:
230:
146:
137:
102:
86:
83:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
658:
656:
647:
646:
626:
625:
619:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
577:
576:
557:
556:
542:WP:POLOUTCOMES
536:
517:
516:
515:
514:
493:
492:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
412:
411:
393:
392:
381:WP:POLOUTCOMES
346:
329:
316:
315:
284:
253:
207:
206:
143:
82:
81:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
657:
645:
643:
639:
634:
628:
627:
623:
620:
618:
614:
610:
605:
602:
601:
594:
590:
586:
581:
580:
579:
578:
575:
572:
569:
561:
560:
559:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
540:
537:
535:
532:
529:
522:
519:
518:
513:
509:
505:
500:
497:
496:
495:
494:
488:
484:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
434:
433:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
396:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:WP:POLITICIAN
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
328:
325:
321:
318:
317:
313:
309:
304:
299:
297:
290:
285:
282:
278:
273:
268:
266:
259:
254:
251:
247:
242:
237:
235:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
140:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
632:
629:
621:
607:reasoning.--
603:
538:
520:
498:
465:
399:
394:
348:
331:
319:
295:
264:
233:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
134:
88:Tom_Hoefling
68:Tom_Hoefling
49:
47:
31:
28:
320:Speedy keep
173:free images
54:Mark Arsten
523:per RCLC.
638:talk page
585:JayJasper
546:JayJasper
422:• Gene93k
369:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
640:or in a
521:Redirect
466:Redirect
437:in-depth
404:Ddcm8991
373:WP:BLP1E
349:Redirect
336:Cjv110ma
211:KYBrad53
132:View log
39:or in a
504:Enos733
483:Enos733
367:and/or
179:WP refs
167:scholar
105:protect
100:history
478:WP:GNG
365:WP:GNG
151:Google
109:delete
491:(UTC)
194:JSTOR
155:books
139:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
622:Keep
613:talk
604:Keep
589:talk
550:talk
539:Keep
508:talk
499:Keep
487:talk
472:per
452:talk
426:talk
408:talk
400:Keep
389:talk
340:talk
332:Keep
296:czar
265:czar
234:czar
215:talk
187:FENS
161:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
58:talk
50:keep
567:Ray
527:Ray
468:to
446:.--
351:to
201:TWL
130:– (
615:)
591:)
552:)
510:)
454:)
428:)
420:.
342:)
324:TM
291:.
260:.
229:.
217:)
181:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
60:)
52:.
611:(
587:(
548:(
506:(
485:(
450:(
424:(
410:)
406:(
391:)
387:(
338:(
307:·
302:·
276:·
271:·
245:·
240:·
213:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
135:·
128:)
90:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.