529:
Just as a matter of clarification though I'll say that what I thought you meant was "since this manga is not available in
English, there won't be coverage by reliable sources and thus would be overwhelmed by fan sources". Thats more of a differing interpretation than taking things out of context.
451:
In all honesty, the
Japanese Knowledge (along with 99.9% of other Wikipedias) has much looser requirements and a higher degree of tolerance with lack of sourcing when compared to the English version. It's not uncommon for Japan-exclusive products, such as video games (a topic I'm used to editing)
861:
Normally, comments aren't removed from AFD discussions, but are crossed out when retracted. I guess in theory both you and KirtZJ could have decided to entirely remove those comments, but you aren't supposed to remove someone else's comments, so you or I couldn't remove his comments above.
598:
That is a good point even if the sources are reliable it does not necessarily mean that the subject is notable since the coverage could be trivial (ie a regurgitation of a press release etc). Can anyone who knows
Japanese look at these sources and weigh in on whether or not the coverage is
452:
have no corresponding article whatsoever or it being in much poorer condition that its
English-language counterpart. Though in this case I completely agree with you as there is a noticeable lack of RS, with the (possible) exception of the three I pointed out above. Thanks,
383:- Firstly, I wish to state that " note that since series hasn't been made available in English, fan-sources overwhelm any reliable sources" is a false statement as just because an article has no coverage in English does not mean it has no coverage in Japanese -
509:
Semantics. Apologies if I wasnt clear. All I did was do a quick google search and found no uniqueness for notability. You feel free to do a more in-depth search. Keeping the article based solely on the reason that it has published volumes (as shown by some of
476:—which is what I meant and doesnt give any weight to keeping this page. At any rate, I dont see anything notable about this page for an English article even if it exists on other language Knowledge(s) which are more lax when it comes to policy.
170:
316:: It looks like it did get a motion comic with full voice acting, so there's that. I'm finding some sourcing, but I'll have to get someone fluent in Japanese (I just use Google Translate) to really check.
628:
first. The mantan web one is a dead link. One of the books did reach number 33 on Oricon, but that counts as a passing mention for notability purposes. Rest are publisher-based primary sources. -
753:
This "ridiculous creation" could have been dealt with in a matter of seconds by means of a blank and redirect, if that is necessary. I can't see how salami tactics can be compatible with WP:R.
624:. No independent mentions, The MyNavi.jp is just a news report that it was adapted into a motion comic, which could have been a press release. Article really needed to be developed at
679:
Prima facie, this is at least a plausible redirect to the magazine in which it was published and therefore ought not to be deleted whilst the article on that magazine exists (WP:R).
260:
955:. Just because it is being published by an English language website does not automatically mean that it will meet the criteria. Assuming that reviews are to come is also a case of
164:
429:
When looking for reliable sources I find that
Knowledge Japan helps and by looking at their entry on the manga it looks like it is only primary sources for external links. -
123:
925:
in addition to not being automatically notable since it was "licensed". I wouldnt exactly call CR a licensee either since the community has never really made this clear.
224:
I suggest that the closing admin thoroughly read the arguments below before making a decision, the WikiProject sees this happen less and less for debates of this kind.
972:
licensed it and released the first volume this past month dispiriting all current chapters being online publication by
Crunchyroll since January of this year. —
240:
96:
91:
918:
100:
130:
83:
213:
required by WP:GNG. At best, it will become automatically notable in the future should it get an anime adaptation. For now it was simply created
722:
I do not think that "probably" is good enough. I think that if you want this deleted now, you should include the magazine in this nomination.
495:
keeping the page, since the same is true for series that do unquestionably pass GNG. It may simply show that you're bad at
Googling. --
336:
Not that the motion comic would keep it on that basis alone, just saying that it gives off the hope that there would be more sourcing.
600:
185:
152:
399:, though whether they count anything towards notability I cannot say, as I'm not able to read in any language other than English.
898:
737:
Thats your opinion. One thing at a time. The WikiProject already has enough problems with these ridiculous creations as it is.
17:
983:
146:
87:
987:
935:
904:
871:
856:
842:
816:
782:
762:
747:
731:
716:
688:
669:
637:
608:
593:
574:
545:
524:
504:
486:
467:
438:
414:
372:
347:
327:
308:
272:
252:
233:
65:
570:
53:
427:
142:
363:
not a policy based argument I know but this gives more time for sources to be found for a possible re-creation. -
1006:
288:
284:
40:
969:
434:
368:
304:
192:
947:
Until there are reviews or other significant coverage, this doesn't meet the inclusion criteria described at
79:
71:
961:
604:
566:
292:
1002:
813:
340:
320:
36:
890:
540:
462:
409:
158:
703:
633:
565:. There are two 100% reliable Jspanese sources in the References section. The series is notable. --
430:
387:
applies. That being said though, there doesn't seem to be much coverage in Japan either - there is
364:
300:
178:
979:
867:
852:
838:
829:
retracted some comments but completely removed them instead of using strikethrough, which is why
758:
727:
684:
500:
396:
956:
922:
491:
The relevant point is that the preponderance of scanlation sites also doesn't give any weight
360:
268:
248:
214:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1001:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
802:
647:
621:
384:
337:
317:
229:
952:
884:
531:
511:
472:
You shouldnt really take what I said out of context. Searching Google throws up a host of
453:
421:
400:
205:. Also, note that since series hasn't been made available in English, fan-sources (i.e.
948:
660:
629:
974:
914:
863:
848:
834:
826:
754:
723:
680:
625:
583:
sources exist on the page does not mean that their content makes the series notable.
496:
202:
392:
264:
244:
57:
117:
926:
830:
773:
769:
738:
707:
699:
584:
515:
477:
296:
225:
959:
as there is a possibility that the manga won't be reviewed. For example, the
805:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
650:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
209:) overwhelm any reliable sources which at the same time lack any kind of
388:
847:
Couldn't this have been dealt with by removing the entire thread?
287:
but the latter article has no references, I would recommend that
995:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
883:. Due to Crunchyroll's license, reviews will start to come in.
217:
and should be deleted or usefyed until a more suitable time.
579:
Thats not a good argument. Just because (questionably)
113:
109:
105:
702:
issues and will probably be nominated for deletion as
177:
283:
I was going to redirect or merge the content over to
261:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
812:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
657:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
514:'s Japanese sources) is hardly compelling though.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1009:). No further edits should be made to this page.
772:matter. The point is this page shouldn't exist.
191:
8:
921:, waiting around for reviews does seem like
259:Note: This debate has been included in the
239:Note: This debate has been included in the
833:now seems to be replying to himself above.
258:
241:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
238:
965:manga did not receive any reviews until
291:be placed up for deletion as well per
7:
24:
698:The magazine article itself has
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
988:02:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
936:01:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
905:00:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
66:07:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
872:18:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
857:17:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
843:15:15, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
825:Just a note to the closer,
817:02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
783:01:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
768:It's AfD because its not a
763:00:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
748:21:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
732:20:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
717:08:22, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
689:20:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
670:17:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
638:03:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
609:03:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
594:02:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
575:23:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
546:22:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
525:21:36, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
505:20:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
487:19:52, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
468:12:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
439:04:46, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
415:02:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
373:02:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
348:04:58, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
328:04:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
309:01:50, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
273:01:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
253:01:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
234:23:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
1026:
289:Manga Time Kirara Forward
285:Manga Time Kirara Forward
998:Please do not modify it.
970:Seven Seas Entertainment
913:Along the lines of what
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Tonari no Kashiwagi-san
72:Tonari no Kashiwagi-san
962:Arpeggio of Blue Steel
599:significant enough?--
211:significant coverage
474:illegal scanlations
207:illegal scanlations
919:at this discussion
765:
734:
691:
48:The result was
901:
893:
819:
752:
721:
706:suggested above.
678:
672:
668:
567:Moscow Connection
503:
275:
255:
54:non-admin closure
1017:
1000:
933:
923:wishful thinking
899:
891:
887:
811:
807:
780:
745:
714:
667:
665:
658:
656:
652:
591:
543:
538:
522:
499:
484:
465:
460:
425:
412:
407:
344:
324:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1007:deletion review
996:
927:
885:
800:
774:
739:
708:
661:
659:
645:
585:
541:
532:
516:
478:
463:
454:
419:
410:
401:
342:
322:
293:WP:NOTINHERITED
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1023:
1021:
1012:
1011:
991:
990:
941:
940:
939:
938:
908:
907:
877:
876:
875:
874:
845:
822:
821:
820:
809:
808:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
704:Knowledgekid87
693:
692:
675:
674:
673:
654:
653:
642:
641:
640:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
444:
443:
442:
441:
431:Knowledgekid87
375:
365:Knowledgekid87
353:
352:
351:
350:
331:
330:
311:
301:Knowledgekid87
277:
276:
256:
236:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1022:
1010:
1008:
1004:
999:
993:
992:
989:
985:
981:
977:
976:
971:
968:
964:
963:
958:
954:
950:
946:
943:
942:
937:
934:
932:
931:
924:
920:
916:
912:
911:
910:
909:
906:
902:
897:
894:
888:
882:
879:
878:
873:
869:
865:
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
846:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
827:User:James500
824:
823:
818:
815:
810:
806:
804:
799:
798:
784:
781:
779:
778:
771:
767:
766:
764:
760:
756:
751:
750:
749:
746:
744:
743:
736:
735:
733:
729:
725:
720:
719:
718:
715:
713:
712:
705:
701:
697:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
677:
676:
671:
666:
664:
655:
651:
649:
644:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:
610:
606:
602:
597:
596:
595:
592:
590:
589:
582:
578:
577:
576:
572:
568:
564:
561:
547:
544:
539:
537:
536:
528:
527:
526:
523:
521:
520:
513:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
485:
483:
482:
475:
471:
470:
469:
466:
461:
459:
458:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
440:
436:
432:
428:
426:I also found
423:
418:
417:
416:
413:
408:
406:
405:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
380:
376:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
354:
349:
346:
345:
339:
335:
334:
333:
332:
329:
326:
325:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
254:
250:
246:
242:
237:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
997:
994:
973:
966:
960:
944:
929:
928:
895:
880:
814:NorthAmerica
801:
776:
775:
741:
740:
710:
709:
662:
646:
617:
601:67.68.22.129
587:
586:
580:
562:
534:
533:
518:
517:
492:
480:
479:
473:
456:
455:
403:
402:
378:
377:
356:
341:
321:
313:
280:
221:
210:
206:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
831:User:KirtZJ
542:(´ ･ ω ･ `)
464:(´ ･ ω ･ `)
411:(´ ･ ω ･ `)
338:Tokyogirl79
318:Tokyogirl79
165:free images
957:WP:CRYSTAL
886:DragonZero
663:Sandstein
535:Satellizer
512:Satellizer
457:Satellizer
422:Satellizer
404:Satellizer
361:WP:TOOSOON
299:issues. -
215:WP:TOOSOON
1003:talk page
630:AngusWOOF
622:WP:BKCRIT
385:WP:NONENG
381:weak keep
265:• Gene93k
245:• Gene93k
37:talk page
1005:or in a
953:WP:NBOOK
915:TheFarix
900:Contribs
864:Calathan
849:James500
835:Calathan
803:Relisted
755:James500
724:James500
681:James500
648:Relisted
581:reliable
497:erachima
124:View log
39:or in a
949:WP:NOTE
493:against
343:(｡◕‿◕｡)
323:(｡◕‿◕｡)
314:Comment
281:Comment
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
58:Natg 19
945:Delete
930:—KirtZ
777:—KirtZ
742:—KirtZ
711:—KirtZ
626:WP:AFC
618:Delete
588:—KirtZ
519:—KirtZ
481:—KirtZ
357:Delete
226:KirtZJ
203:WP:GNG
201:Fails
143:Google
101:delete
975:Farix
967:after
917:said
222:Note:
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
892:Talk
881:Keep
868:talk
853:talk
839:talk
770:WP:R
759:talk
728:talk
700:WP:N
685:talk
634:talk
620:per
605:talk
571:talk
563:Keep
501:talk
435:talk
397:this
395:and
393:this
389:this
379:Very
369:talk
359:per
305:talk
297:WP:N
295:and
269:talk
249:talk
230:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
951:or
193:TWL
122:– (
52:. (
986:)
982:|
903:)
870:)
855:)
841:)
761:)
730:)
687:)
636:)
607:)
573:)
437:)
391:,
371:)
307:)
271:)
263:.
251:)
243:.
232:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:)
984:c
980:t
978:(
896:·
889:(
866:(
851:(
837:(
757:(
726:(
683:(
632:(
603:(
569:(
433:(
424::
420:@
367:(
303:(
267:(
247:(
228:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.