449:
perfectly notable article on a piece of hair if you wanted to, all it takes is a bit of research. What is really the point in deleting it when there is hundreds of thousands of worse articles and stubs? Do what you like, but i think putting a bit of effort into an article is a lot more satisfying than going around deleting others' work altogether. I just don't get how so many people show up to affirm deletions but add nothing to the articles. All i'm saying is, you guys could at least aide in the contribution to merge the info into
564:. Please re-read. Just on a side-note, is it possible to do an article on all of the members of a band? I never see this on wikipedia and i don't really get why, surely if one member can't gain notability - four or five would be able to, i mean every band has some sort of other notable past-time. When you people say merge, where to do you mean?
291:
album which brought the top 10 single "Shake It". He's produced other music as well, Sing It Loud - an upcoming band that'll big big probably next year. I haven't really researched, but that can be done. Sure it's really badly written, but if you're going to go to the trouble of doing this you might
448:
I really couldn't be bothered arguing this, but i just don't get why you people go and delete articles like this, being a member of a band that is currently highly successful is a lot more notable than other things that are on wikipedia, things that are stubs and the like. God, you could create
292:
as well of fixed the page up yourself, it's not like these pages have been stubs for a year like a hell of a lot of pages i've fixed in the past. And as he said we should just merge it, rather than deleting. But, stuff about his production would be totally out of place in MCS' article.
453:
instead of wasting your time with a delete (and i'd just like to reassert i did not contribute anything significant to these articles, so it's not a bias account). Btw, Sing It Loud are definitely notably deserving of a
Knowledge (XXG) page, they recently signed to
458:
and released an EP through
Epitaph, i remember reading something about Epitaph leading further towards the poppy side of rock and away from the classic Bad Religion-esque style. Yes this point is
348:
513:
Yeah that wasn't supposed to be part of the argument not to delete it, i was just syaing i don't get why you'd bother messing with an article like this. Go find something better to do?
486:
That's a straw man argument. Just because there are less notable articles on
Knowledge (XXG) doesn't make these articles any more notable. At the end of the day, they still fail
314:
Actually, according to the article he only produced two songs from the album. I don't think that increases his notability outside of MCS enough to warrant his own article.
537:
got tagged for this group nom as well, but is not mentioned anywhere in the AfD. I have removed the AfD tag since this listing is already so close to closure as it is. --
129:
549:
Since this is already a bit of a mess (as I note above about the incomplete nom), and the band itself seems notable, merging sounds like the best option. --
228:
223:
232:
215:
648:
was originally meant to be a part of the nomination, but wasn't added until towards the end. I felt this was the best option rather than doing a
582:
Unfortunately, his credits outside of MCS still just aren't extensive enough. Plus, an "article on all of the members of a band" already exists,
160:
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are pages about band members who have done nothing notable outside of the band.:
17:
96:
91:
660:
629:
182:
177:
100:
186:
60:
596:
500:
324:
219:
146:
83:
169:
679:
466:
becomes a top 10 hit? Definitely be a better article than any of the producer articles i've ever seen (all comprise of
36:
678:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
645:
534:
211:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
401:. Neither of these musicians have done enough notable things outside of being in MCS to warrant an article.
583:
450:
664:
633:
604:
573:
553:
541:
522:
508:
479:
443:
423:
389:
362:
332:
301:
274:
154:
65:
288:
287:'s article for deletion page, my bad, so it's about Cain) Nothing notable? He was the co-producer of
459:
398:
56:
487:
408:
593:
497:
384:
321:
271:
143:
87:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
173:
455:
654:
623:
569:
550:
538:
518:
475:
436:
413:
355:
297:
49:
587:
491:
380:
315:
268:
137:
79:
71:
249:
203:
117:
616:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
373:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
136:
Articles about band members that haven't done anything notable outside the band.
48:, default to keep all. Suggest nominating each individually after a few weeks.
561:
284:
165:
565:
514:
471:
293:
462:, but what happens if Metro Station release one of Cain's singles and
672:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397:
Also, saying that a band will be "big next year" goes against
435:
two songs? That's a long way from performing on the album.
468:
Jim is a producer. Jim has produced these 10 albums. The end
349:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
245:
241:
237:
199:
195:
191:
124:
113:
109:
105:
621:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
378:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
682:). No further edits should be made to this page.
407:, article fails to establish notability as per
267:any useful information to the band's entry. --
8:
560:I have basically done a full makeover of
347:: This debate has been included in the
470:). At least help me merge it people.
644:- I relisted this discussion because
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
283:(This was meant to be posted on
1:
257:-02:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
699:
665:18:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
634:17:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
605:01:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
574:15:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
554:02:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
542:02:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
523:06:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
509:16:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
480:09:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
444:09:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
424:08:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
390:07:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
66:17:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
675:Please do not modify it.
646:Matthew Taylor (bassist)
535:Matthew Taylor (bassist)
363:17:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
333:15:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
302:15:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
275:15:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
212:Matthew Taylor (bassist)
155:14:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
451:Motion City Soundtrack
46:no consensus to delete
636:
422:
392:
365:
361:
352:
64:
690:
677:
620:
618:
590:
494:
440:
420:
419:
412:
377:
375:
360:
358:
353:
343:
318:
253:
235:
207:
189:
140:
127:
121:
103:
54:
44:The result was
34:
698:
697:
693:
692:
691:
689:
688:
687:
686:
680:deletion review
673:
663:
632:
614:
601:
588:
505:
492:
456:Epitaph Records
438:
417:Esradekan Gibb
415:
414:
371:
356:
329:
316:
289:Metro Station's
226:
210:
180:
164:
151:
138:
123:
94:
78:
75:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
696:
694:
685:
684:
668:
667:
659:
638:
637:
628:
619:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
597:
577:
576:
557:
556:
544:
528:
527:
526:
525:
501:
483:
482:
446:
426:
402:
394:
393:
376:
368:
367:
366:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
325:
307:
306:
305:
304:
278:
277:
260:
255:
254:
208:
159:
147:
134:
133:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
695:
683:
681:
676:
670:
669:
666:
662:
657:
656:
651:
647:
643:
640:
639:
635:
631:
626:
625:
617:
613:
612:
606:
602:
600:
594:
591:
585:
581:
580:
579:
578:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
555:
552:
548:
545:
543:
540:
536:
533:
530:
529:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
506:
504:
498:
495:
489:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
452:
447:
445:
442:
441:
434:
430:
427:
425:
421:
418:
410:
406:
403:
400:
396:
395:
391:
388:
386:
382:
374:
370:
369:
364:
359:
350:
346:
342:
341:
334:
330:
328:
322:
319:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
303:
299:
295:
290:
286:
282:
281:
280:
279:
276:
273:
270:
266:
263:
262:
261:
258:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
230:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
184:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
157:
156:
152:
150:
144:
141:
131:
126:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
62:
58:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
674:
671:
653:
650:no consensus
649:
641:
622:
615:
598:
546:
531:
502:
467:
463:
437:
432:
428:
416:
404:
379:
372:
344:
326:
264:
259:
256:
158:
148:
135:
80:Tony Thaxton
72:Tony Thaxton
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
562:Joshua Cain
285:Joshua Cain
166:Joshua Cain
460:WP:Crystal
439:RGTraynor
399:WP:CRYSTAL
655:Jauerback
624:Jauerback
551:Ned Scott
539:Ned Scott
357:Paul Erik
488:WP:MUSIC
433:produced
409:WP:MUSIC
130:View log
61:contribs
51:lifebaka
642:Comment
599:Contrib
589:Rwiggum
532:Comment
503:Contrib
493:Rwiggum
429:Delete:
381:seresin
327:Contrib
317:Rwiggum
269:Cameron
229:protect
224:history
183:protect
178:history
149:Contrib
139:Rwiggum
97:protect
92:history
405:Delete
233:delete
187:delete
125:delete
101:delete
661:dude.
630:dude.
547:Merge
265:Merge
250:views
242:watch
238:links
204:views
196:watch
192:links
128:) – (
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
584:here
570:talk
566:kiac
519:talk
515:kiac
476:talk
472:kiac
345:Note
298:talk
294:kiac
246:logs
220:talk
216:edit
200:logs
174:talk
170:edit
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
57:talk
652:.
431:He
351:.
603:)
586:.
572:)
521:)
507:)
490:.
478:)
464:it
411:.
385:¡?
383:(
331:)
300:)
248:|
244:|
240:|
236:|
231:|
227:|
222:|
218:|
202:|
198:|
194:|
190:|
185:|
181:|
176:|
172:|
153:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
59:-
658:/
627:/
595:/
592:(
568:(
517:(
499:/
496:(
474:(
387:)
354:—
323:/
320:(
296:(
272:*
252:)
214:(
206:)
168:(
145:/
142:(
132:)
122:(
120:)
82:(
63:)
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.