197:
X-factor UK is being televised and encouraging a rash of articles about the contestants before they achieve independent notability. This case is unusual, because the article is about a 2011 self-published album by a current X-Factor contestant, released for download 12 months before anyone knew of
166:
202:. The track 'Last Night' has probably had significantly more coverage because it was sung during the audition stage of X-factor. I would argue that the album, in comparison, has been largely unnoticed. Does not meet
223:
348:
Though placed in reply, that comment is entirely unconnected to mine. Hence I can't see that addressing it would lead to you dealing with either that reply or my original one.
199:
160:
119:
279:
126:
92:
87:
198:
her. It gets several recent mentions in the press, because it had to be removed from I-Tunes. Maybe the best (and only) mention in any depth is
96:
79:
349:
313:
181:
298:
So where's the evidence of strong coverage to back up the 'strong keep's? Charting isn't sufficient in itself to pass WP:NMUSIC.
148:
17:
280:"Spraggan’s independently released 2011 album, Top Room At The Zoo...is also the sixth biggest selling album of the week"
142:
422:
440:
409:
371:
357:
343:
321:
307:
290:
270:
235:
215:
61:
459:
424:
40:
138:
83:
353:
317:
188:
455:
266:
57:
36:
286:
174:
75:
67:
426:
254:
154:
231:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
454:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
391:
262:
258:
246:
203:
53:
362:
In that case, I'm not sure what point you were making either. Like you say, best leave it.
367:
339:
303:
282:
250:
211:
330:. Neither of the 'strong keeps' (one of whom is the author) make any argument based on
278:: This is a charting album which would have done even better, had it not been deleted:
421:. "Strong" is too strong for me, but I do believe enough coverage exists on the album
431:
331:
327:
403:
227:
312:
i prefer seeing the coverage, personally, but that's not what the guideline says.
113:
363:
335:
299:
207:
394:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
448:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
428:, combined with the chart info, to warrant an article.
109:
105:
101:
173:
224:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
401:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
249:criteria. The album has peaked to number 22 on the
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:). No further edits should be made to this page.
187:
8:
222:Note: This debate has been included in the
221:
261:. The album has also received coverage.
7:
326:Albums and recordings need to meet
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
441:20:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
410:18:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
372:19:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
358:16:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
344:09:56, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
322:17:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
308:17:10, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
291:06:28, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
271:17:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
236:20:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
62:16:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
216:20:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
479:
451:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
253:and number 72 on the
200:this recent article
76:Top Room at the Zoo
68:Top Room at the Zoo
255:Irish Albums Chart
48:The result was
439:
412:
238:
470:
453:
438:
435:
429:
406:
400:
396:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
466:
460:deletion review
449:
433:
430:
404:
389:
251:UK Albums Chart
245:: It does meet
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
465:
464:
444:
443:
415:
414:
413:
398:
397:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
257:and does meet
240:
239:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
463:
461:
457:
452:
446:
445:
442:
437:
436:
427:
425:
423:
420:
417:
416:
411:
408:
407:
399:
395:
393:
388:
387:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
281:
277:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:
447:
432:
418:
402:
390:
350:86.44.49.108
314:86.44.49.108
275:
274:
242:
241:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
276:Strong Keep
263:Greenock125
243:Strong Keep
161:free images
54:Mark Arsten
283:Gnu andrew
206:criteria.
456:talk page
434:Gongshow
259:WP:NMUSIC
247:WP:NMUSIC
204:WP:NMUSIC
37:talk page
458:or in a
392:Relisted
120:View log
39:or in a
405:MBisanz
228:Frankie
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
332:WP:GNG
328:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
364:Sionk
336:Sionk
300:Sionk
208:Sionk
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
419:Keep
368:talk
354:talk
340:talk
318:talk
304:talk
287:talk
267:talk
232:talk
226:. —
212:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
189:TWL
118:– (
370:)
356:)
342:)
334:.
320:)
306:)
289:)
269:)
234:)
214:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
366:(
352:(
338:(
316:(
302:(
285:(
265:(
230:(
210:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.