220:, article as described gives no claim of notability, just unpublished community usage of a term to describe a broad class of cannabis, with no sources. On a quick look, the online mentions that I find appear to be user-submitted unverified content such as blog postings. Can someone else provide sources meeting
250:
Oh, come on now. There may very well be books and magazines from reputable non-vanity publishers which give substantial coverage to this topic and don't happen to be online. Or some that I missed in a quick review of the first few pages of a Google search, or whose publisher's website blocks
197:
TenPoundHammer is correct: a simple "keep" or "delete" expression with no reason given is useless for determining community consensus, and is only good for headcounting, which AfD is not. Asking "why?" is much less a waste of space than the reply timestamped 20:36.
251:
Google's spiders, or whose online mentions were blocked by my ISP. "Beyond a shadow of a doubt" is an absurd claim. I'll change my vote to "keep" if a couple of sources are cited.
119:
233:
Since this is not a head count, I don't think any further comment on this article is necessary. This is, beyond a shadow of a doubt, not a noteworthy "strain" of marijuana.
92:
87:
96:
79:
17:
260:
237:
228:
202:
188:
168:
155:
139:
127:
61:
282:
36:
83:
164:
Why are you asking why when it says why on the top of this page? Stop wasting space on
Knowledge (XXG), please!
281:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
75:
67:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
178:
234:
182:
165:
149:
136:
55:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
256:
221:
50:
113:
252:
225:
199:
275:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
126:
Unsourced and non-notable strain of cannabis-- JediLofty
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
285:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
238:22:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
229:21:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
203:21:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
189:20:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
169:20:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
156:20:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
140:19:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
128:17:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
261:14:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
62:05:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
302:
76:Toronto Hydro (marijuana)
68:Toronto Hydro (marijuana)
278:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
293:
280:
185:
184:Ten Pound Hammer
152:
151:Ten Pound Hammer
117:
99:
60:
34:
301:
300:
296:
295:
294:
292:
291:
290:
289:
283:deletion review
276:
183:
150:
90:
74:
71:
49:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
299:
297:
288:
287:
270:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
243:
242:
241:
240:
235:Coccyx Bloccyx
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
192:
191:
172:
171:
166:Coccyx Bloccyx
159:
158:
143:
142:
137:Coccyx Bloccyx
124:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
298:
286:
284:
279:
273:
272:
271:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
239:
236:
232:
231:
230:
227:
223:
219:
216:
215:
204:
201:
196:
195:
194:
193:
190:
186:
180:
176:
175:
174:
173:
170:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
153:
147:
146:
145:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
57:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
277:
274:
269:
217:
133:
125:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
179:WP:NOREASON
177:Because of
120:View log
51:Kubigula
93:protect
88:history
218:Delete
134:Delete
97:delete
46:delete
253:Barno
226:Barno
222:WP:RS
200:Barno
148:Why?
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
257:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
56:talk
187:•
154:•
118:– (
48:.--
259:)
224:?
181:.
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
255:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.