389:). There are claims of reliable sources support in the article with links to legitimate magazines covering the trade. The failure here is in specific citation. A chance should be given for an editor to convert the generic magazine links and claims of reliable source support into specific citations. If this cannot be done - it should come back here for deletion. --User:Ceyockey (
52:, although this is a borderline case. I checked the links on the article and only one of them links to actual coverage; the rest link to the top page of the magazine in question. In order to prove significant press coverage we really need to know article dates, authors, and the context (
122:
269:
I've reworked this article in a neutral fashion...any suggestions on how I can improve on this? I'm new to this. Thank you for your help. --
17:
248:
95:
90:
99:
442:
36:
82:
56:
is impossible without such details). I would say no prejudice to recreation of an article which unambiguously meets
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
180:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
201:
Although the spam has been fixed this is not really encyclopedic and has seems to have notability issues. --
342:
270:
424:
412:
398:
377:
345:
333:
315:
273:
259:
233:
216:
190:
157:
64:
243:
229:
86:
187:
175:
324:
392:
61:
78:
70:
360:
298:
202:
140:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
341:
Rewritten once again having read more info on
Knowledge (XXG) requirements. Please review. --
253:
171:
134:
354:
292:
283:
167:
130:
57:
49:
225:
53:
409:
329:
421:
116:
282:
Above user has rewritten article from neutral point of view. It may still fail
420:
as it appears to be legit. I have added in-line cites, a stub, and tags.
129:
Article about a for-pay tattoo design site. Reads like an advert, fails
435:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
408:
Even with the rewrite its still just an ad. for a nn org.
224:
as blatant spam. This should have been tagged with a CSD.
386:
112:
108:
104:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
48:. No assertion has been made that the site meets
445:). No further edits should be made to this page.
357:; just not notable enough for Knowledge (XXG).
8:
133:. No references. Does not adhere to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
346:23:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
334:23:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
316:22:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
274:20:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
260:17:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
234:17:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
217:16:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
191:16:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
158:16:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
286:, but I'm not exactly sure.
425:15:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
413:15:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
399:17:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
378:00:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
65:21:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
462:
438:Please do not modify it.
383:Keep and tag for sources
32:Please do not modify it.
353:I think it still fails
241:— useless spam. --
396:
212:
208:
453:
440:
390:
373:
369:
366:
363:
332:
311:
307:
304:
301:
256:
251:
246:
214:
210:
206:
185:
178:
153:
149:
146:
143:
120:
102:
34:
461:
460:
456:
455:
454:
452:
451:
450:
449:
443:deletion review
436:
371:
367:
364:
361:
328:
309:
305:
302:
299:
254:
249:
244:
203:
181:
176:
151:
147:
144:
141:
93:
77:
74:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
459:
457:
448:
447:
430:
428:
427:
415:
402:
401:
380:
348:
336:
318:
276:
263:
262:
236:
219:
193:
188:Stormtracker94
127:
126:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
458:
446:
444:
439:
433:
432:
431:
426:
423:
419:
416:
414:
411:
407:
404:
403:
400:
395:
394:
388:
384:
381:
379:
376:
375:
374:
356:
352:
349:
347:
344:
343:Lucretiastone
340:
339:Do not delete
337:
335:
331:
326:
322:
319:
317:
314:
313:
312:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
275:
272:
271:Lucretiastone
268:
267:Do not Delete
265:
264:
261:
258:
257:
252:
247:
240:
237:
235:
232:
231:
227:
223:
222:Speedy Delete
220:
218:
215:
213:
200:
197:
194:
192:
189:
186:
184:
179:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
155:
154:
136:
132:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
62:Sam Blacketer
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
437:
434:
429:
417:
405:
391:
387:this version
385:(looking at
382:
359:
358:
350:
338:
320:
297:
296:
291:Still fails
288:
279:
278:
266:
242:
238:
228:
221:
204:
198:
195:
182:
177:STORMTRACKER
163:
139:
138:
128:
54:verification
45:
43:
31:
28:
393:talk to me
79:Tattoodles
71:Tattoodles
325:WP:ADVERT
280:Withdrawn
410:Marcus22
330:Jonathan
123:View log
422:Bearian
351:Comment
289:Comment
172:WP:SPAM
135:WP:NPOV
96:protect
91:history
406:Delete
355:WP:WEB
321:Delete
293:WP:WEB
284:WP:WEB
255:eybaná
239:Delete
196:Delete
168:WP:WEB
164:Delete
131:WP:WEB
100:delete
58:WP:WEB
50:WP:WEB
46:delete
230:Cobra
226:Glass
211:AVIES
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
418:Keep
323:per
207:OGER
199:spam
170:and
166:per
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
370:Fan
308:Fan
150:Fan
121:– (
397:)
372:24
368:AR
365:SC
362:NA
327:.
310:24
306:AR
303:SC
300:NA
295:.
245:Ag
183:94
174:.
152:24
148:AR
145:SC
142:NA
137:.
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
60:.
250:ü
209:D
205:R
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.