340:. What there is in the article is not great. The C++ code has to go, sources are needed, the title and some of the text is confusing or unclear, and a rename is certainly in order, perhaps even a redirect and merge. However, I don't see any argument for deletion beyond "it is kind of minor". We have lots of stubs like that. The fact that a pair of circles have four bitangents is notable enough, and the connection with the center of homothety is significant and sourced. I reckon if this were a well written ten line stub, instead of its current state, then no one would have batted an eyelid.
399:
601:? The first part of the article doesn't make much sense to me: instead of stating a/the problem it just throws some equations in there. The article could perhaps be rewritten to deal with the more general tangency problem of Apollonius (from the 2nd reference), in which case it won't be not the same (in general) as finding the
320:
While the topic may just about be notable enough for discussion somewhere, this article doesn't make sense. It talks about 2 "points of tangency", when I can see eight points in the diagram which have a line tangent to the circle at them, and I don't see the point of including C++ code for a simple
533:
is not a good merge, since it involves other aspects of geometry and other engineering considerations for real-life belts and pulleys.) However, the fact that even the mathematicians here couldn't find
502:
453:
and redirect this article to b.pr. That the belt problem is about engineering (and additional facets) does not, IMO, preclude putting the mathematics underlying the problem there.
121:
542:
this article as a less technical version, and one that is not diluted with polygons. I recognize that the article is very bad at the moment, but I for one am willing to help
88:
83:
383:
This topic is a very important topic and is very important in the solving of advanced geometrical problems. Therefore I think it should be kept and added to. --
92:
75:
660:, per all the changes made by Willow. The article is now much broader, far more clearly notable, and in general drastically improved. Amazing job!
564:
OK, I've seeded a smattering of content there. Perhaps some of you would like to pitch in? I'm sure it'd be fun and easy, especially for
392:
133:
This seems to me to be a very minor bit of geometry and I am not certain that it warrants its own article. However this is only a
628:
editor acting in good faith is involved. With luck, Willow's kindness has not only saved an article, but retained a contributor.
79:
17:
669:
651:
634:
612:
585:
555:
488:
462:
439:
420:
402:
371:
360:
346:
330:
308:
287:
263:
241:
216:
198:
183:
158:
57:
71:
63:
624:. Can I remind fellow editors that we don't delete articles because their content is a mess. Particular not where an
683:
484:
458:
36:
682:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
569:
212:
194:
179:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
609:
647:
251:
665:
630:
526:
435:
416:
389:
367:
356:
342:
154:
142:
606:
480:
454:
304:
300:
283:
279:
53:
237:
208:
190:
175:
643:
573:
661:
602:
598:
581:
551:
535:
522:
506:
412:
384:
352:
259:
150:
138:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
474:
First of all, this article is trivial and fails to be encyclopedic. It also fails to satisfy
514:
430:
543:
326:
49:
278:
I think the topic is at most marginally notable, but I am prepared to change my mind. --
625:
233:
546:
to make it better. Comments and contributions from other people are always welcome.
510:
174:
I don't think the current content is sufficiently encyclopedic to be worth saving. —
621:
577:
547:
530:
518:
501:
geometrical articles, but not to contribute to them, or even to comment on them at
450:
426:
408:
299:. Marginally notable, and it looks like we have a lot of reasonable content now. --
255:
229:
109:
475:
365:
Title changed and article substantially improved. I've updated my !vote below.
322:
568:. :) Rabi and I were Talking, and we decided to change the article's name to
169:
572:, which you might prefer. I have to run off now, but I left you all an
411:, as Gandalf noted. How would people feel about a merge and a redirect?
576:
there! Go in peace and delete no more — wait, is that how it goes? ;)
497:
It's depressing to see how many smart mathematicians can find time to
398:
429:
is about one application of that concept and several other concepts (
521:. Yes, this is a minor topic, and yes, it's a retread of parts of
505:. I think I can comment here with some authority, since I've been
620:. This article has been transformed thanks to the intervention of
676:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
433:, arclength of a circle etc.) to solve an engineering problem.
507:
working actively on numerous topics in basic circle geometry
425:
Not convinced. This article is about a concept in geometry.
207:
after significant improvements since the start of the AfD. —
351:
I think if kept the title may need to be changed as well.
189:
See
Gandalf61's comment below for a better merge target. —
168:. If merged, a possible appropriate merge target would be
116:
105:
101:
97:
597:: How is this problem different from finding the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
686:). No further edits should be made to this page.
137:--I'd like to hear what the community thinks.
8:
44:The result was the nomination was
7:
407:It appears this is quite similar to
24:
397:
145:) 08:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
670:21:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
652:20:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
635:19:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
613:13:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
586:17:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
556:11:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
489:10:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
463:13:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
440:07:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
421:06:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
403:01:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
372:19:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
361:21:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
347:21:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
331:14:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
309:18:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
288:14:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
264:10:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
242:13:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
217:17:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
199:14:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
184:05:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
159:21:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
58:23:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
538:tells me that it's wise to
72:Tangent between two circles
64:Tangent between two circles
703:
679:Please do not modify it.
570:Tangent lines to circles
250:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
148:Nomination withdrawn.
658:Nomination Withdrawn
642:per "Geometry guy".
254:. It is listed now.
595:Question/suggestion
603:homothetic center
599:homothetic center
536:homothetic center
525:. (I agree with
523:homothetic center
431:similar triangles
395:
694:
681:
515:power of a point
401:
388:
119:
113:
95:
34:
702:
701:
697:
696:
695:
693:
692:
691:
690:
684:deletion review
677:
481:Topology Expert
455:Jakob.scholbach
321:calculation. --
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
700:
698:
689:
688:
655:
654:
637:
615:
591:
590:
589:
588:
559:
558:
492:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
443:
442:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
334:
333:
314:
313:
312:
311:
291:
290:
269:
268:
267:
266:
245:
244:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
209:David Eppstein
191:David Eppstein
176:David Eppstein
128:
127:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
699:
687:
685:
680:
674:
673:
672:
671:
667:
663:
659:
653:
649:
645:
644:Michael Hardy
641:
638:
636:
633:
632:
627:
626:inexperienced
623:
619:
616:
614:
611:
608:
604:
600:
596:
593:
592:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:Steiner chain
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
491:
490:
486:
482:
477:
473:
470:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
444:
441:
438:
437:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
400:
394:
391:
386:
382:
379:
373:
370:
369:
364:
363:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
348:
345:
344:
339:
336:
335:
332:
328:
324:
319:
316:
315:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
294:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
275:
271:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
187:
186:
185:
181:
177:
173:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
156:
152:
149:
146:
144:
140:
136:
130:
126:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
678:
675:
662:TallNapoleon
657:
656:
639:
631:Geometry guy
629:
617:
594:
565:
539:
531:belt problem
519:radical axis
498:
494:
479:
471:
451:belt problem
446:
436:Geometry guy
434:
427:Belt problem
413:TallNapoleon
409:Belt problem
385:electricRush
380:
368:Geometry guy
366:
353:TallNapoleon
343:Geometry guy
341:
337:
317:
296:
273:
272:
230:belt problem
225:
204:
188:
165:
164:
151:TallNapoleon
147:
139:TallNapoleon
134:
132:
131:
129:
125:
45:
43:
31:
28:
618:Speedy keep
274:Weak delete
135:weak delete
574:Easter egg
544:Rabi Javed
509:, such as
301:Hans Adler
280:Hans Adler
252:incomplete
50:Malcolmxl5
338:Weak keep
297:Weak keep
276:or merge.
234:Gandalf61
170:bitangent
46:withdrawn
122:View log
256:DumbBOT
89:protect
84:history
622:Willow
578:Willow
548:Willow
517:, and
499:delete
472:Delete
318:Delete
166:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
529:that
527:G-guy
449:with
447:Merge
323:Tango
228:with
226:Merge
172:, but
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
666:talk
648:talk
640:Keep
582:talk
552:talk
540:keep
495:Keep
485:talk
476:WP:N
459:talk
417:talk
381:Keep
357:talk
327:talk
305:talk
284:talk
260:talk
238:talk
213:talk
205:Keep
195:talk
180:talk
155:talk
143:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
48:. --
566:you
503:FAC
668:)
650:)
607:VG
605:.
584:)
554:)
513:,
487:)
478:.
461:)
419:)
396:)
359:)
329:)
307:)
286:)
262:)
240:)
232:.
215:)
197:)
182:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
664:(
646:(
610:☎
580:(
550:(
483:(
457:(
415:(
393:C
390:T
387:(
355:(
325:(
303:(
282:(
258:(
236:(
211:(
193:(
178:(
153:(
141:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.