Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Tara Reade

1988:

of page prior to then), because she is associated with a prestigious university she merits a page, unlike Reade who is a nobody and should not have one outside the allegations page. There are two things I see wrong here: first off, is the flagrant classism such an answer displays. It emphasizes that even though neither woman had a page prior to their accusations, the elite woman deserves to be acknowledged as a human outside of the case itself, while the non-elite woman does not. This leads to my second dispute with your post: the implicit idea that someone getting a page is a merit of some kind. It's not. You don't earn a wikipedia page. It's not "belittling" to not have a wikipedia page. The vast majority of people who do important work will never have a wikipedia page; it does not mean they are not important, it simply means that they are notable by wikipedia's technical definition. I'm a little disturbed by the implication that you think Ford doesn't deserve to be "belittled" yet Reade *does* deserve to be "belittled" because she is not important enough by your standards--which again, have nothing to do with notability, only social class.

3407:, and the like throughout the project wherein companion articles either summarize or expand upon content within its partner upon a subject tree. Speaking of trees, a possible decision tree might go like this. Does wp:SINGLEEVENT preclude blp coverage of any individual notable primarily for one event, yes or no? If it does, then no matter what, there can be no blp. If it does not, then this question is no longer relevant. Does wp:PSEUDOBIOGRAPHY apply here? Same thing. If so, no go. If not, go to next question. Does the fact that there is a companion article on Knowledge (XXG) covering the event preclude there being a blp, yes or no? Same thing. Next question: Is she notable? Final question: Should there be two articles? (Zapruder/ Zapruder film.) Or, one? (Breonna Taylor's biogaphy being contained within the 3589:: As others have noted, she meets the notability exception to the one event rule, and her biographic details don't really belong in the Biden allegations page. The fact that her biographic details have largely come from articles about the Biden allegations is irrelevant. I have written and contributed to several biographic articles on Knowledge (XXG) and have found many biographic details in news articles that weren't specifically about the subject of the biography. The tangential subject of the source doesn't make the biographic detail unusable. Tara Reade's notability is evolving with the extensive news coverage she has received, and more is expected up to the November election. Deletion discussions are premature at this time. After the election would be a good time to revisit keeping/merging/deleting. 2221:

policy. What I see is every time a legitimate story is durogetory to one faction or another faction, it is swarmed by partisans trying to hide it. Not just this article, most. Each time we give credence to these arguments, each time an article is deleted, we are allowing wikipedia to get censored. You encourage these political factions to hire operatives to do it more. Yes, 100K edits and 13 years, I have been fighting a long battle against censorship.

3326:

about the sexual misconduct. People's understanding of these claims are better informed when they have information about who is making these claims. Therefore, it is of use to understanding the incident to provide a biography of the individual making the claims. Additionally, WP:ONEEVENT does not strictly rule against making articles about people associated with one notable event, it merely urges consideration and caution with doing so.

114: 31: 2010:

this article or redirecting it when it's very clear that there is becoming more and more to add to it with each passing day. Instead, what I suggest is that the article on the Biden assault allegation should be changed to an article about the various accusations of sexual misconduct he has received over the course of his political career, with the longest section being about Reade.

3176: 1243:. "Unique content" about Reade may be factual and verifiable but not suitable for inclusion. We can't just decide that we need to include paragraphs of her biography somewhere or other because we think it makes for good reading if Reade herself is not considered notable and if few, if any, sources about the allegation present that information. 3471:, not all things important to understanding who the accuser is are directly relevant to the allegations themselves, which makes them inappropriate for the main article on the allegations, and thus the main article will inevitably provide an incomplete picture on who the person making the allegations is. 2220:

Yes, every Trump story should be told as best we can. That is our job. Personally, I don't like that these kinds of stories keep showing up about our politicians, but they do. We shouldn't report innuendo fabricated by bloggers. When it gets into major media, then we should report it. That is our

1987:

Are you trying to imply that Ford is somehow objectively more important than Reade because of her social class? I think I am reading your comment wrong, but the argument I am hearing is as follows: even though Ford only became a public figure because of her Kavanaugh accusation (evidenced by her lack

3382:

If the blp's summary of the subject's allegations are incorrect, the fix is to edit this part of the article. If items of her personal history are inappropriate, ditto. Blanket removal of biographical treatment from Knowledge (XXG) seems a roundabout way to address these issues. And if these type of

2939:

and the like) have biographical articles, I agree with your "support of a biographical article about Reade," as well. Yet, citing wp:OTHERSTUFF, our support is able to be independent of whether editors at "Joe Biden sexual assault allegation" come finally to the consensus for basic biographical info

2130:

The reader is already informed about who Reade is in the article on the Joe Biden sexual assault allegation. However, she is otherwise not a notable individual, and telling people about various unrelated elements of her private life, like where she lives now, is silly when Reade has complained about

1419:

You understand that means we remove the 2019 stuff, the story of her attempts to be heard, her off-topic discussions with people who did not mention assault when interviewed by journalists, and a lot of the "commentary" not related to assault. I think all that is significant encyclopedic content for

1117:- (weak) It’s no longer ONEEVENT - there’s 2019 and then there’s 2020. Also, it seems like she’s made herself into a PUBLICFIGURE by seeking media reporting and giving interviews. The suggestion to merge the sexual assault article here makes sense, that one may be getting into BLP details. Cheers 3367:

article. When you remove that whats left in this article is trivia about blog posts and details about her family, where she was born etc. If something is truely relevant to the allegations she has made, it should be in the allegations article. If it's not in that article, it is because rightly or

2009:

Though Reade may not have reached the level of national notability that Blasey-Ford has yet, it doesn't seem likely that media coverage of this allegation is going to slow down any time in the near future, and as such, details of Reade's personal life as well. I just don't see the point of deleting

474:

lists cases where sufficient independent coverage within reliable sources exists regarding individuals known mostly for one event, their thereby meriting treatment in their own biography. (Notes: Reade's biographical section was removed from the sexual assault allegation article due editors there's

3081:

As for the contention that her biography "can be covered elsewhere," such essentially converts to !votes for the contents of the two articles' merger, inasmuch as that, at the present, there is no biographical section (nor mention of Reade's age, residence, education, history as domestic violence

3325:

This article allows us a proper space to explain items of Reade's biography that are critical to understanding who she is/might be, but which would have questionable relevance in an article solely dedicated to the sexual misconduct allegations she has made. This helpfully supplements the article

2458:

to have some context about what is happening here. There have been numerous discussions there about starting a "Tara Reade" article, moving that article to a title which included her name (which was ultimately defeated) and the scope of that article. You are under no obligation to get involved

3489:

itself? Do you think we need to know that she had a child after, that she has written some blogs? What information are we talking about here? Because I tend to think any information which is not relevant to the allegations (the only reason she is "notable") is a violation of her privacy per

2111:

This is a story in current news and has been for a couple of months, particularly since April 8. To eliminate Reade's identification from wikipedia would do a great disservice to our readership, remember, the reason we are doing this. We should provide answers to questions like; "Who is this

2112:

person?" Perhaps some Biden supporters would love to find excuses for this story to go away, at least until he can get elected. Step one, make the accuser / victim go away. Serving their politically based interests is not neutral. Blanking any content for political purposes is improper.

2700:. Ironically I'm a Chapo Trap House fan, and argued over a month ago to keep Reade's allegation from being disappeared from the relevant page, but a bunch of Chapo participants have come here to take up arms because we're all Biden supporters who make policy-based arguments in bad faith. 1951:

Christine Blasey Ford absolutely derives all of her notability from the accusation she made, and the proof is that she didn't have her own article until she came out publicly with her allegations against Brett Kavanaugh. To keep her article but not Tara Reade's is a double standard.

2815:

In those cases we had no article dedicated to the event (each particular woman's allegation); instead biographical articles were created long after the accusations emerged. In Reade's case, this (pseudo-)biographical article was created after the article on the allegation,

2824:. If we had no article on the allegation, I would support a biographical article about Reade, but as we already have that article the appropriate step was to get consensus for a title change. That was suggested at several points but no consensus formed (see 1042:), while the subject of the allegation does meet the general article criteria. That means we should stick to the subject and only discuss those parts of Reade's life that are related to the allegation by the body of reliable sources on the subject (see 3344:

If the information truly is "critical to understanding who she is/might be", then it should be in the sexual assault article anyway, which would make this article redundant to that article and filled with non-critical info on a non-notable individual.

3571:

Notable due to the amount of coverage. Also Wiki is supposed to be source of info for popular individuals and this person meets the notability guidelines. There is major interest in her at the moment as people trying to find out her background.

2888:

is also notable for having been inducted into the Oklahoma Women's Hall of Fame; she has received multiple awards and an enduring prominence. So far Tara Reade's article is a pseudo-biography that repeats the information in the original article

2820:, was created based on the current news coverage and to avoid overwhelming the Joe Biden article. So, different situation. The Tara Reade article is essentially redundant, unlike the others. In addition to redundancy, that raises the issue of 1519:. Applying the general test: the article appears to fail criterion 1; passes criterion 2; may pass criterion 3. The reason the article may pass criterion 3 is Reade's 2019 accusations; however, the 2019 accusations fall under the purview of 2340:

if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified...If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally

1662:

1936:

Christine Blasey Ford does not derive her notability from the accusation she made. To do so would belittle her professional accomplishments, being a notable person primarily for her work as a professor at a prestigious university.

1463:

I think that's greatly complicating the matter, however. Half of what's currently in the allegations article is really off-topic. In the Tara Reade article, all the circumstances and history would naturally come within the topic.

1444:

article as background for the "2020 stuff" -- because it is discussed in relation to the sexual assault allegation by a lot of sources, it should go there. We should look to reliable sources for guidance on what to include.

1181:

can and should include all the surrounding information - background, her treatement by the media, the circumstances of the 2019 allegation and its reporting, and additional detail not related to the 2020 allegation.

932:

Saying a senator grabbed your junk 26 years ago is not as significant as killing a world leader, just a slow news month, cabin fever is rampant. Nothing she did in 2019 was notable, article arrived last month. Only

899:

If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate. The assassins of major political leaders, such as Gavrilo Princip, fit into this

767:. The scant biographical information that is relevant to her sexual assault accusation and noteworthy can be merged back into that article, provided that there is consensus to do so on that article's talk page. - 359: 3453:, because I don't wish to spend my time editing an article which should ultimately be deleted and restored to a redirect. If this article is deleted that would not have been a good use of my time.-- 599: 2024: 2011: 1016: 1003: 2846:

By way of correction. Although to-date the present case involves solely inquiries of a journalistic nature, in the past when there have been some manner of formal Senate committee vettings (see

1880:

and let's face it, allowing this article to remain is step one; step two will be merging the sexual assault article into this article which will divorce the name "Joe Biden" from the story.

441: 1406:, the only content unrelated to the allegation is essentially a brief CV. I do not believe that Reade's CV should be included in the allegation article, so I favor "delete" over "merge". 2459:

there or to read the numerous and longwinded discussions there, but you might want to be careful throwing around allegations of "bad faith" and "shame" if you aren't prepared to do so.--

3432: 3095: 2494: 2353: 1392: 1226: 492: 1973:

It would have been credible if the article was created before Kavanaugh's controversy. It wasn't. Christine Blasey Ford became a national figure because of Kavanaugh's controversy. --

121: 2338:"When an individual is significant for his or her role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both …. However, 2164:") ascribing partisan political motives to those who interpret the guidelines differently than you do? As someone who has 13 years and 100k edits, you're undoubtedly familiar with 2949: 2871: 2785:

due to being peripheral to that topic. There is strong precedent on Knowledge (XXG) for including articles on alleged sexual misconduct victims with major media attention, such as

1274: 2516: 1515:

I'm seeing a general trend towards keep in recent comments, so I feel the need to expand on my delete rationale. As other users have pointed out, this appears to be an example of

1063:- per ONEEVENT, and per SPADE you can see from the talk pages of this article and Joe Biden that this is just a bad faith attempt to draw negative attention away from Joe Biden. 3211:

but after examining the Tara Reade article virtually most of it is about the allegation and not about who she is independent of the allegation. This leads me to believe this is

3683:, zero notability of her own beyond the event that she came up with. What there is to say about her can be said at the allegation article, she is not notable as an individual. 3359:

That is my concern exactly. To understand the allegations one does not need to know that years afterwards she had a child, nor do you need to know about non-relevant/notable

415: 2742: 3308:

article is long (and presumably will only grow) even without Reade's biographical details, and readers are better served if this article is kept and improved, not deleted.

2825: 2540: 2512: 2277: 2273: 619: 2028: 2015: 1529:

Do any reliable sources cover the individual themselves as a main or sole focus of coverage, or is the person mentioned only in connection with an event or organization?

639: 510: 312: 902:". Yes, indeed. To put it simple, is she famous? Yes, very much so. She claimed something outrageous (aka "notable) in spring of 2019. She did the same in 2020. Is it 398:. There is no need to restate them here. This article should be deleted or merged into that article. This page was a redirect until today, that should be restored. 3610:. Besides, this has similarities to the Brett Kavanugh sexual assault allegations in 2018, and considering that Joe Biden is a major presidential candidate, and that 1002:- Article appears to be written to shift attention away from Joe Biden and towards Tara Reade. Reade is only notable for the allegation and is not notable otherwise. 3485:

She is only notable for the one event. What information would be key to understanding a complete picture of the accuser and her allegations, but not be relevant to

2197:

I have to agree an enormous amount of bad faith in your statement above. I assume following your logic that you're in favour of creating an article for every single

353: 3383:

things are content forks (dual treatments of an "identical" subject), WP will need to fix there being what's otherwise considered SUMMARY STYLE tree pairs, such as

579: 2524: 1922:, which was created at the time of Kavanaugh' sexual assault allegations. There's enough coverage within reliable sources to write a factual separate article. -- 244: 958:

Therefore, I believe it is more appropriate to have this page about the person, rather that a page about notable, but questionable accusation by the person.

782:

as it stands, if you take out the "allegation of misconduct" section (which already has its own article), there's nothing notable about her. Classic case of

40: 3665: 259: 2198: 3638: 2733:

Non-cogent arguments ought be discounted, including as well any !votes-for-deletion above inexplicably citing wp:ONEEVENT as a blanket proscription(!)--

3025: 3607: 3392: 2851: 2847: 2532: 2520: 2500: 2455: 1365: 1357: 1035: 736: 2499:

Sure, but as you well know there were also discussions about inclusion of information in a biographical section there which some editors cautioned

3304:

per above. In my opinion, the intense coverage of Reade and her story merits an exception to 1E, per the multiple precedents mentioned above. The

1485: 3462: 2902: 2552: 2252: 1252: 319: 2976: 2066:); have a look at them. Even for biographical detail apparently unrelated to the "one event", such as, say, "resides in Nevada County" (note 1239:

article should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of the body of reliable sources that focus on the allegation as per

2781:- We have enough news coverage to make a good article on this person. In fact, this is a good place to keep material that was deleted from 1959: 1724: 1711: 3724: 130: 1492:

respectively, and as far as I can tell it is already there. The "off-topic" content may be appropriate for a Tara Reade article, but per

1177:. The allegation article is full of content that exceeds any reasonable interpretation of its scope for that article title. This article 3701: 3680: 3551: 3530: 3486: 3364: 3305: 3281: 3252: 3204: 3083: 2968: 2890: 2817: 2782: 2757: 2698: 2388: 2269: 1989: 1852: 1826: 1779: 1760: 1746: 1638: 1596: 1532: 1520: 1489: 1441: 1316: 1236: 1174: 1153: 1079: 982: 907: 888: 865: 827: 809: 764: 536: 480: 395: 82: 3669: 2715: 2032: 1768: 1732: 1024: 812:. This page has been heavily discussed and there is not consensus to have a second article about Reade, duplicative of the allegation. 160: 3428: 3368:

wrongly consensus is currently against including it there. The solution to that is to raise it there, not to create a content fork.--

3091: 2945: 2867: 2738: 2490: 2349: 1388: 1380: 1270: 1222: 1020: 1007: 843: 488: 2671: 2387:. And as that article notes, it is about BOTH "Elizabeth Short and her murder". Here we already have an article about Tara Reade's 239: 232: 17: 3770: 3112: 2248: 2972: 1039: 894: 3661: 3648: 2918:, we see that inasmuch as other alleged victims-not-averse-to-their-becoming-public-figures (who've likewise received not just 2091: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 794: 710: 704: 698: 694: 556: 1265:, it's possible for individuals to be considered notable for our purposes despite their primarily being so due to one event.-- 285: 280: 85:. Once one discards the obvious one-edit SPAs, the comments that do not reference any policy at all, and the large number of 1038:

when not aware of the discussion here, "Tara Reade does not meet Knowledge (XXG)'s notability criteria for biographies (see

253: 249: 146: 3424: 3087: 2941: 2863: 2734: 2486: 2345: 1384: 1376: 1266: 1218: 484: 963: 919: 701:– web archive of her own domain from April 2019; image-heavy CV-style page: "Non-Profit Consultant-Available for Projects" 289: 539:

article. Everything relevant about Reade is already included in the allegation article's background section. Also citing

374: 86: 1671: 3752: 1516: 1202: 341: 69: 46: 272: 1739:

Please don't make triggering comments about sexual assault victims. It's gross and makes wikipedia a hostile place.

1573: 720:

Except for brief CV-like info, it is very difficult to find anything that is not about this event. Should be merged.

93:, there is a consensus that this should not exist as a stand alone article, but there is not consensus to delete it. 3259:. Only notable for that one event, no reason to have this seperate article that is essentially just a content fork. 3034:

and aired in 13 countries. It was shown by major outlets reaching a combined tens of millions of viewers including "

3538: 3228: 3188: 3139: 2632: 2615: 2265: 119:

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is

3503: 3458: 3412: 3373: 3264: 2687: 2548: 2464: 2417: 2396: 2285: 1906: 1068: 744: 675: 647: 627: 607: 587: 562: 403: 3657: 3644: 192: 2828:), so this additional article was created out of a redirect, bypassing the process that should have been used. 2569: 959: 915: 452: 426: 3615: 3491: 3277: 1963: 1728: 1715: 1659: 1262: 471: 2454:. I would also invite you to reconsider your comments and have a look through the talk page and archives at 3577: 3476: 3408: 3331: 2365:

is only notable for a single event, yet she has her own page. All the protests are being made in bad faith.

1993: 1764: 1750: 1667: 1523:. I am not dead-set on my delete !vote, but I have not seen evidence that the article passes criterion 1 of 1088: 878: 335: 3438: 2915: 2881: 2854:), WP includes both "event" entries along with companion BLPes of the accusers (see respectively those for 1955: 1742: 906:? I do not think so. A couple, at least. Saying that, probably the best solution would be to merge article 688: 502: 176: 150: 3704:, that is where all of the current notability of the article is coming from. Tara on her own doesn't meet 3046:" show and Fox News Channel's "Special Report" and "The Five," as well as international outlets including 2370: 942: 838: 671: 135: 3748: 3623: 3611: 3534: 3404: 3220: 3216: 3180: 3131: 3126: 3108: 3001: 2898: 2859: 2833: 2802: 2769: 2705: 2645: 2628: 2611: 2607: 2507:, by including irrelevant details to suggest she was not being honest. That is one of the problems of a 2140: 1919: 1787: 1698: 1664: 1450: 1369: 1248: 1122: 1051: 90: 65: 3725:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-74-former-biden-staffers-think-about-tara-reades-allegations

3606:

While Tara Reade has no notability on her own, she may have a impact on certain states in the upcoming

3442: 2536: 2333: 1898: 1877: 1685: 1617: 1135: 663: 540: 506: 391: 331: 3735: 3715: 3692: 3652: 3627: 3598: 3581: 3563: 3542: 3507: 3480: 3377: 3354: 3335: 3317: 3296: 3268: 3235: 3215:

which would better be served in the Joe Biden sexual allegation article. Though we have an article on

3195: 3164: 3146: 3116: 3005: 2980: 2911: 2894: 2837: 2829: 2806: 2773: 2728: 2709: 2701: 2691: 2675: 2657: 2636: 2619: 2594: 2576: 2468: 2421: 2400: 2374: 2324: 2307: 2289: 2256: 2230: 2211: 2185: 2144: 2136: 2121: 2103: 2019: 1997: 1982: 1967: 1946: 1931: 1910: 1889: 1864: 1838: 1817: 1791: 1754: 1719: 1702: 1675: 1650: 1629: 1608: 1585: 1568: 1539: 1505: 1475: 1454: 1446: 1440:

If by "2019 stuff" you mean her previous allegation of inappropriate touching, then it belongs in the

1431: 1410: 1244: 1193: 1165: 1144: 1126: 1118: 1109: 1092: 1083:. Alternatively could go the other way (merge Tara Reade into Joe Biden sexual assault allegation). -- 1072: 1055: 1047: 1011: 994: 967: 946: 923: 881: 850: 816: 798: 774: 748: 729: 679: 651: 631: 611: 591: 570: 526: 459: 433: 407: 97: 3713: 3594: 3499: 3468: 3454: 3369: 3350: 3260: 3160: 2683: 2653: 2590: 2544: 2460: 2441: 2433: 2413: 2392: 2366: 2281: 1902: 1860: 1856: 1834: 1830: 1808: 1105: 1064: 740: 707:– a 3-sentence bio at Women's Int'l Perspective from 2009, which mentions surviving domestic violence 643: 623: 603: 583: 544: 518: 399: 94: 2821: 2528: 1802: 1138:

to the letter. Strip the allegations against Joe Biden out of the article and there's nothing left.

3313: 3059: 2226: 2117: 1646: 1561: 1470: 1426: 1188: 552: 446: 420: 367: 3495: 3446: 2667: 2508: 2132: 2047: 1524: 1240: 1043: 691:

beyond this one event. I checked the references section in the article, and this is what I found:

381: 3731: 3688: 3573: 3559: 3472: 3400: 3327: 2790: 2320: 2181: 2099: 1942: 1581: 1327: 1084: 725: 182: 113: 3288: 3256: 3212: 2989: 2165: 1498: 1494: 783: 760: 2996:

suggestion. Depending on future events regarding the allegations, she may become more notable.

2303: 2131:

harassment and doxing. As Mathglot wrote above, we are looking at a "pseudo-biography" as per

1978: 1927: 1625: 1161: 938: 833: 228: 58:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3747:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

2993: 2914:, consensus within each situation is determined independently of that within another. Citing 2246:- For the reasons stated above (particuarly by Hodgdon's secret garden and DiamondRemley39). 1707: 1689: 981:- Notable for one event. Article appears to be created in an attempt to rename or remove the 667: 64:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

3619: 3208: 3104: 3071: 3039: 3035: 2997: 2798: 2794: 2765: 2315:

per WP:BLP1E. There has been no notability demonstrated outside of the allegation she made.

1783: 1694: 1604: 990: 3705: 3018: 2761: 2539:

particularly when there is already an article about that event. And probably why you were

2504: 2451: 2202: 2173: 2169: 2087: 3708: 3590: 3450: 3346: 3292: 3169: 3156: 3063: 3051: 2649: 2586: 2362: 1101: 872: 514: 276: 2884:. Each biographical article is judged on its own merits in its own context. For example, 2535:. This is one of the reasons we are not supposed to make biographies for people who are 2160:. Did you really intend to spend the last four sentences of your Afd comment (starting, " 2157: 1918:

I'm amazed by the double standard between this article and for example the article about

347: 3309: 3055: 2724: 2473:

Note: Of course, re-naming the allegation article would only happen with a decision to

2447: 2222: 2207: 2192: 2151: 2113: 1885: 1642: 1556: 1465: 1421: 1331: 1183: 1140: 788: 548: 3014: 3764: 3727: 3684: 3555: 3416: 3384: 2992:. It is sufficiently covered elsewhere and can be redirected. I don't agree with the 2316: 2177: 2095: 1938: 1577: 1536: 1502: 1407: 1403: 1293: 813: 771: 721: 3075: 2610:

has her own article so should Reade. Its well sourced and highly relevant today. --

2384: 2299: 1974: 1923: 1621: 1157: 210: 198: 166: 2718:

that have come out of the woodwork with Keep votes and no actual reasoning beyond

2519:(and suggest there is something sinister about that), engage in speculation about 306: 2161: 145:

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to

3420: 2893:

and adds some non-notable details that consensus has omitted from that article.

2786: 1600: 1298: 986: 952:

Yes, she is person notable for only one "event". However, this is not really an

475:

belief it's extraneous to event-article's focus. A merger discussion regarding

3614:, has her own page, it definitely makes sense to keep. For those of you using 3396: 3360: 3043: 2885: 2855: 1361: 1320: 1178: 869: 858:- changing because the delete arguments convinced me. 02:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 476: 268: 103: 3618:

as an argument against, it was never ruled out, just needing extra caution.

3067: 1881: 1710:

Your partisanship is not an argument to salt articles you find inconvenient

3363:. The long sections about the allegations here are already covered in the 1555:

because I can only imagine the news articles after this article is deleted

1420:

a Tara Reade article. It's not on topic for the sexaul assault allegation.

2848:

Clarence_Thomas_Supreme_Court_nomination#Allegations_about_sexual_comments

2264:

Further to my nomination above, I think this article may also run foul of

2086:

from sources about the Biden assault allegations. The only exceptions are

1358:

Clarence_Thomas_Supreme_Court_nomination#Allegations_about_sexual_comments

3388: 3047: 3022: 768: 1217:– or ought it be anticipated that any of its unique content be merged?-- 1665:

Christine_Blasey_Ford#Sexual_assault_allegation_against_Brett_Kavanaugh

1370:

Christine_Blasey_Ford#Sexual_assault_allegation_against_Brett_Kavanaugh

1046:). The rest of Reade's biography is not suitable for its own article." 3449:. No, I am not going to try to argue about the irrelevant content at 2585:

No point except for the fact that Knowledge (XXG) policy supports it.

2412:- Shame on anybody who wants it deleted. That's right - I said SHAME. 1595:. Not notable, and the one event for which she is covered already has 1490:

Joe_Biden_sexual_assault_allegation#Allegations_and_interviews_in_2019

3172:

I will strike my edit then, and come up with a better argument later

2156:

I assume you and everyone here votes based on their understanding of

1782:

into this article, which has been transformed into a good biography.

3054:." The interview was also covered in top publications including The 1235:

See my comment above. I believe any content related to Reade in the

2852:

Brett_Kavanaugh_Supreme_Court_nomination#Sexual_assault_allegations

2201:? Assuming everyone here has a political motivation is contrary to 1851:, because any merge attempt would inevitably overturn consensus on 1366:

Brett_Kavanaugh_Supreme_Court_nomination#Sexual_assault_allegations

2481:

the other way would not do so and neither would, per wp:ONEEVENT,

2043: 1283:

In any case, as a practical matter, the choices before us include:

953: 2278:

consensus against moving the article to include Tara Reade's name

1901:. Her role is very significant within the one significant event. 763:. Most of the content of this article duplicates the material in 394:. Ms. Reade's allegations are already detailed at length in the 2298:, she only known for this single event. Have article on event.-- 3743:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

2531:

which might avoid some of the scrutiny that is taking place at

2046:, but wanted to add that this article fits the definition of a 108: 25: 2714:

Wow Reading those threads I guess it explains all the random

1531:. The only example of coverage of Reade that is unrelated to 1501:

I do not believe having a Tara Reade article is appropriate.

2383:

There is no article on Elizabeth Short, there is one on the

1484:

Reade's attempts to be heard and the "2019 stuff" belong in

139:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 3419:'s being contained within his biography and the beating of 3207:– my earlier argument was faulty. I do slightly agree with 2971:. Not notable and only known for that article in question. 2515:. If this just becomes a place to talk about her different 2090:, or CV-like mini-bios (e.g., "earned a law degree" – note 826:

Reade was not notable before the allegation. Merge back to

535:– This appears to be the sixth attempt or so to rename the 2541:

discouraged from doing this before you created the article

600:

list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions

129:

among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has

3219:, she is independent on her own for her academic work. 2679: 302: 298: 294: 670:

as well. She has no notability beyond the allegation.

366: 3021:? In only the case of her TV interview, according to 1100:. She is not notable enough to have her own article. 442:

list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions

3445:

which is covered elsewhere. Yes, I think this is a

511:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 8

1486:

Joe_Biden_sexual_assault_allegation#Reade's_account

380: 3030:.. Kelly's interview with Reade was picked up in 2826:Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation/Archive 5 2568:- There is no point in deleting this page, None. 868:- she is only notable because of the allegation. 72:). No further edits should be made to this page. 3755:). No further edits should be made to this page. 3082:expert witness in court hearings, etc.) within " 638:Note: This discussion has been included in the 618:Note: This discussion has been included in the 598:Note: This discussion has been included in the 578:Note: This discussion has been included in the 440:Note: This discussion has been included in the 414:Note: This discussion has been included in the 1332:Karen_McDougal#Alleged_affair_with_Donald_Trump 416:list of California-related deletion discussions 2760:. None of her other life activities have been 2485:this biography as a companion article to it.-- 2074:), or "testified as an expert witness" (notes 2070:), her mother's date of death ("2016" – note 735:Note: This discussion has been noted on the 620:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 159:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 8: 640:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 260:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 956:, but just an accusation made by the person 1953: 1825:. This is essentially a redundant fork of 1740: 637: 617: 597: 580:list of Women-related deletion discussions 577: 439: 413: 133:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 2527:, etc... well then this is really just a 3608:2020 United States Presidential Election 3411:and Neda Agha-Soltan's biography within 2533:Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2456:Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1847:Just to clarify: this should be deleted 1036:Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 937:background to that one event, the rest. 737:Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 713:are about the sexual assault allegation. 153:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 2025:2600:1702:10A0:6DA0:D958:BA51:AC1A:8BAB 2012:2600:1702:10A0:6DA0:D958:BA51:AC1A:8BAB 45:For an explanation of the process, see 3032:375 local U.S. news television markets 3028: 2391:, so it isn't really the same thing.-- 2337: 1637:. article effectively covered over at 1528: 1134:- almost falls under the criteria for 1017:2600:100C:B24F:7C9A:A082:6472:C500:175 1004:2600:100C:B24F:7C9A:A082:6472:C500:175 3173: 1692:, until she gets her Fox “news” job. 1201:to those !voting delete (tipp'dhat: " 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 3533:. She has no notability on her own. 3155:That's not a policy-based argument. 3702:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3681:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3552:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3531:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3365:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3306:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3282:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3253:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3205:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 3084:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2969:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2891:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2818:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2783:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2758:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2511:whether a stand alone article or a 2270:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1853:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1827:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1780:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1639:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1533:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1521:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1442:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1317:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1237:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1175:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1154:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1080:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 1040:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) 983:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 914:article, not the other way around. 908:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 889:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 866:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 828:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 810:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 765:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 537:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 481:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 396:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 83:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation 2764:to warrant an individual article. 390:This article seems to run foul of 24: 1508:; edited 00:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 3437:Thanks, I am not going to argue 3174: 2940:about Reade's inclusion there.-- 2162:Perhaps some Biden supporters... 245:Introduction to deletion process 112: 29: 3467:Except, as I very clearly said 2272:into this article would ignore 1203:Knowledge (XXG):Delete or merge 47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review 3361:blog posts or essays she wrote 2521:the meanings of her blog posts 2513:section within another article 2332:- For !voters unfamiliar with 1261:Yes. Yet also, of course, per 41:deletion review on 2020 May 19 1: 2674:, as was previously noted by 2450:. I would remind you all to 509:). I have transcluded it to 149:on the part of others and to 3494:and an attempt to bulk up a 2336:, please note that it reads 2249:May His Shadow Fall Upon You 2973:MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken 1383:) 20:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)-- 1211:unique content at this blp 1034:- As I previously wrote at 501:This AfD was not correctly 483:also has been initiated.)-- 235:(AfD)? Read these primers! 3787: 3443:only notable for one event 3415:; or else, the killing of 3013:Is the person notable per 2926:-article coverages by the 2537:only notable for one event 711:Refs 1-8, 10-15, and 17-26 3413:Death of Neda Agha-Soltan 3276:Reade is not notable per 3771:Pages at deletion review 3745:Please do not modify it. 3736:17:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 3716:00:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 3693:23:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC) 3653:04:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC) 3628:23:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3599:21:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3582:18:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3564:17:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3543:16:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3508:18:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 3481:22:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3463:17:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3433:17:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3378:15:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3355:15:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3336:08:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3318:00:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 3297:22:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3269:11:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3236:18:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3196:18:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3165:07:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3147:04:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3117:21:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 3096:18:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 3050:in the U.K. and CNBC's " 3006:01:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2981:00:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2950:18:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2903:17:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2872:17:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2838:22:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2807:22:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2774:20:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2743:17:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2729:16:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2710:16:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2692:16:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2658:14:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2637:13:31, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2620:10:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2595:16:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 2577:04:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2553:17:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2495:16:43, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2477:it into this article. A 2469:02:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2422:01:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2401:02:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2375:01:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2354:18:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2325:10:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2308:07:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2290:03:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2257:14:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2231:20:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2212:08:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2186:06:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2145:03:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2122:01:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2104:22:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 2094:, possibly also a SPS). 2020:21:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1998:08:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1983:14:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 1968:13:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1947:10:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 1932:18:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1911:18:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1890:15:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1865:04:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 1839:12:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1818:08:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1792:20:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC) 1755:08:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1720:16:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1703:05:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1676:04:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1540:18:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1506:21:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1476:02:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1455:01:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1173:and merge content from 968:21:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 98:18:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 61:Please do not modify it. 3487:the allegations article 3441:. Yes, I think she is 3425:Hodgdon's secret garden 3409:Death of Breonna Taylor 3088:Hodgdon's secret garden 2942:Hodgdon's secret garden 2864:Hodgdon's secret garden 2735:Hodgdon's secret garden 2487:Hodgdon's secret garden 2346:Hodgdon's secret garden 1651:23:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1630:23:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1609:22:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1586:22:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1569:20:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1432:20:36, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1411:20:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1393:21:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1385:Hodgdon's secret garden 1377:Hodgdon's secret garden 1275:20:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1267:Hodgdon's secret garden 1253:20:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1227:17:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1219:Hodgdon's secret garden 1194:16:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1166:15:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1145:10:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1127:07:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1110:06:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1093:03:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1078:Keep and merge article 1073:03:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1056:02:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1012:02:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 995:01:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 947:02:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 924:01:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 887:Keep and merge article 882:22:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 851:21:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 817:21:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 799:21:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 775:21:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 749:20:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 730:20:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 680:20:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 652:20:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 632:20:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 612:20:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 592:20:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 571:20:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 527:19:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 493:19:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 485:Hodgdon's secret garden 460:19:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 434:19:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 408:19:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 191:; accounts blocked for 161:single-purpose accounts 131:policies and guidelines 89:comments, mostly about 3103:per TDRK Chicago 101. 1535:is Mathglot's Ref 16. 808:No notability outside 3670:few or no other edits 3658:Napoleonjosephine2020 3645:Napoleonjosephine2020 3639:BLP violation removed 3612:Christine Blasey Ford 3217:Christine Blasey Ford 3127:Christine Blasey Ford 2608:Christine Blasey Ford 2158:policy and guidelines 1920:Christine Blasey Ford 1855:in multiple ways. -- 1769:few or no other edits 1733:few or no other edits 1620:, as mentioned above 1025:few or no other edits 233:Articles for deletion 91:Christine Blasey Ford 3672:outside this topic. 3550:- Keep, or merge to 2172:. And probably even 2035:outside this topic. 1771:outside this topic. 1735:outside this topic. 1027:outside this topic. 3423:within his, etc.)-- 3060:Wall Street Journal 2572:Istandwiththesilent 2525:cheque fraud claims 2050:to a T. The brief 1876:. Consistent with 1576:, or echoes of it. 1199:Procedural question 960:My very best wishes 916:My very best wishes 143:by counting votes. 122:not a majority vote 87:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 3401:Kavanaugh hearings 2791:Juanita Broaddrick 1668:Barrettsprivateers 1517:WP:PSEUDOBIOGRAPHY 1328:Juanita Broaddrick 499:Automated comment: 3673: 3642: 3232: 3192: 3143: 2666:- There has been 2627:per WP:ONEEVENT. 2523:, air unverified 2274:discussions there 2268:and that merging 2036: 1970: 1958:comment added by 1816: 1772: 1757: 1745:comment added by 1736: 1658:- Guideline page 1574:WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL 1028: 891:into this article 875: 751: 654: 634: 614: 594: 569: 529: 525: 470:- Guideline page 462: 436: 250:Guide to deletion 240:How to contribute 224: 223: 220: 147:assume good faith 95:Black Kite (talk) 53: 52: 39:was subject to a 3778: 3711: 3655: 3636: 3535:FollowTheSources 3496:pseudo-biography 3447:pseudo-biography 3233: 3230: 3227: 3223: 3193: 3190: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3144: 3141: 3138: 3134: 3072:Associated Press 3040:CBS This Morning 3036:NBC Nightly News 2912:user:Zloyvolsheb 2795:Gennifer Flowers 2646:TDKR Chicago 101 2629:Snooganssnoogans 2612:TDKR Chicago 101 2574: 2509:pseudo-biography 2503:or perpetuate a 2445: 2437: 2266:WP:REDUNDANTFORK 2255: 2196: 2163: 2155: 2048:pseudo-biography 2042:I've previously 2022: 1815: 1813: 1811:Volunteer Marek 1806: 1758: 1722: 1565: 1559: 1014: 873: 848: 846: 841: 836: 734: 567: 560: 521: 520:Talk to my owner 516: 497: 458: 455: 449: 432: 429: 423: 385: 384: 370: 322: 310: 292: 230: 218: 206: 190: 174: 155: 125:, but instead a 116: 109: 63: 33: 32: 26: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3753:deletion review 3709: 3529:And merge with 3500:Darryl Kerrigan 3469:Darryl Kerrigan 3455:Darryl Kerrigan 3451:Talk:Tara Reade 3393:Thomas hearings 3370:Darryl Kerrigan 3274:Delete or Merge 3261:Devonian Wombat 3229: 3225: 3221: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3175: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3064:Washington Post 3052:Asia Squawk Box 2684:Darryl Kerrigan 2570: 2545:Darryl Kerrigan 2461:Darryl Kerrigan 2442:AllThatJazz2012 2439: 2431: 2414:AllThatJazz2012 2393:Darryl Kerrigan 2363:Elizabeth Short 2282:Darryl Kerrigan 2247: 2190: 2149: 2109:Absolutely Keep 1903:Banana Republic 1849:without merging 1809: 1807: 1563: 1557: 1343: 1311: 1065:Kolya Butternut 897:and it tells: " 893:. I am reading 877: 844: 839: 834: 832: 797: 741:Darryl Kerrigan 672:DiamondRemley39 644:Darryl Kerrigan 624:Darryl Kerrigan 604:Darryl Kerrigan 584:Darryl Kerrigan 565: 545:Darryl Kerrigan 524: 519: 453: 447: 445: 427: 421: 419: 400:Darryl Kerrigan 327: 318: 283: 267: 264: 227: 208: 196: 180: 164: 151:sign your posts 107: 77:The result was 70:deletion review 59: 37:This discussion 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3784: 3782: 3774: 3773: 3763: 3762: 3758: 3757: 3739: 3738: 3723:per WP:BLP1E. 3718: 3695: 3674: 3630: 3616:WP:SINGLEEVENT 3601: 3584: 3566: 3548:Keep or merge 3545: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3492:WP:AVOIDVICTIM 3339: 3338: 3320: 3299: 3278:WP:SINGLEEVENT 3271: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3222:cookie monster 3182:cookie monster 3150: 3149: 3133:cookie monster 3119: 3098: 3078:in the U.K. .. 3056:New York Times 3008: 2983: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2906: 2905: 2875: 2874: 2841: 2840: 2810: 2809: 2776: 2762:notable enough 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2661: 2660: 2639: 2622: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2580: 2579: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2425: 2424: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2378: 2377: 2356: 2327: 2310: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2215: 2214: 2188: 2147: 2125: 2124: 2106: 2037: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1985: 1971: 1960:177.237.42.174 1913: 1892: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1842: 1841: 1820: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1777:Keep and merge 1773: 1737: 1725:177.237.42.174 1712:177.237.42.174 1678: 1660:wp:SINGLEEVENT 1653: 1632: 1611: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1510: 1509: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1458: 1457: 1435: 1434: 1414: 1413: 1396: 1395: 1373: 1348: 1341: 1335: 1309: 1303: 1292:- delete (eg/ 1284: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1263:wp:SINGLEEVENT 1256: 1255: 1230: 1229: 1205:") - Ought WP 1196: 1168: 1147: 1129: 1112: 1095: 1075: 1058: 1029: 997: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 927: 926: 884: 871: 853: 820: 819: 802: 801: 793: 777: 753: 752: 732: 717: 716: 715: 714: 708: 702: 682: 656: 655: 635: 615: 595: 574: 573: 530: 517: 495: 472:wp:SINGLEEVENT 464: 463: 448:Chris Troutman 437: 422:Chris Troutman 388: 387: 324: 263: 262: 257: 247: 242: 225: 222: 221: 117: 106: 101: 75: 74: 54: 51: 50: 44: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3783: 3772: 3769: 3768: 3766: 3756: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3741: 3740: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3726: 3722: 3719: 3717: 3714: 3712: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3696: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3640: 3634: 3633:STRONG DELETE 3631: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3602: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3585: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3574:Expertwikiguy 3570: 3567: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3546: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3525: 3524: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3488: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3473:SecretName101 3470: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439:WP:OTHERSTUFF 3436: 3435: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3417:Ahmaud Arbery 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3385:Zapruder film 3381: 3380: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3328:SecretName101 3324: 3321: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3300: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3283: 3280:, though the 3279: 3275: 3272: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3247: 3246: 3237: 3234: 3224: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3194: 3184: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3148: 3145: 3135: 3130: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3080: 3079: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3031: 3026: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3009: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2984: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2963: 2962: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2938: 2935: 2932: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2916:wp:CONSISTENT 2913: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2887: 2883: 2882:WP:OTHERSTUFF 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2777: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2727: 2726: 2721: 2717: 2716:users and IPs 2713: 2712: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2640: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2623: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2602: 2601: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2567: 2564: 2563: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2501:could dox her 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2443: 2435: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2408: 2407: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2357: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2342: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2311: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2204: 2200: 2199:Trump accuser 2194: 2189: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2159: 2153: 2148: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056:22 references 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2008: 2005: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1990:67.168.189.62 1986: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1893: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1871: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1814: 1812: 1804: 1800: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1761:67.168.189.62 1756: 1752: 1748: 1747:67.168.189.62 1744: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1693: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1612: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1560: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1336: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1294:Zapruder film 1291: 1290: 1285: 1282: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1214: 1210: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1169: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1152:and merge to 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085:The Cunctator 1082: 1081: 1076: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 998: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 977: 976: 969: 965: 961: 957: 955: 950: 949: 948: 944: 940: 936: 931: 930: 929: 928: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 896: 892: 890: 885: 883: 880: 876: 870: 867: 863: 862: 857: 854: 852: 849: 847: 842: 837: 829: 825: 822: 821: 818: 815: 811: 807: 804: 803: 800: 796: 791: 790: 785: 781: 778: 776: 773: 770: 766: 762: 758: 755: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 733: 731: 727: 723: 719: 718: 712: 709: 706: 703: 700: 696: 693: 692: 690: 686: 683: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 658: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 636: 633: 629: 625: 621: 616: 613: 609: 605: 601: 596: 593: 589: 585: 581: 576: 575: 572: 564: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 531: 528: 522: 515: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 473: 469: 466: 465: 461: 456: 450: 443: 438: 435: 430: 424: 417: 412: 411: 410: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 383: 379: 376: 373: 369: 365: 361: 358: 355: 352: 349: 346: 343: 340: 337: 333: 330: 329:Find sources: 325: 321: 317: 314: 308: 304: 300: 296: 291: 287: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 265: 261: 258: 255: 251: 248: 246: 243: 241: 238: 237: 236: 234: 229: 216: 212: 204: 200: 194: 188: 184: 178: 172: 168: 162: 158: 154: 152: 148: 142: 138: 137: 132: 128: 124: 123: 118: 115: 111: 110: 105: 102: 100: 99: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 73: 71: 67: 62: 56: 55: 48: 42: 38: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3744: 3742: 3720: 3697: 3676: 3632: 3603: 3586: 3568: 3547: 3526: 3322: 3301: 3284: 3273: 3248: 3200: 3122: 3121: 3100: 3076:The Guardian 3033: 3029: 3010: 2988:for now per 2985: 2964: 2936: 2933: 2930: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2778: 2753: 2723: 2719: 2680:edit summary 2663: 2662: 2641: 2624: 2603: 2571: 2565: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2409: 2385:Black Dahlia 2358: 2341:appropriate. 2339: 2329: 2312: 2295: 2263: 2243: 2206: 2108: 2083: 2054:section has 2039: 2006: 1954:— Preceding 1915: 1894: 1873: 1848: 1822: 1810: 1799:Delete/Merge 1798: 1776: 1741:— Preceding 1688:and perhaps 1681: 1680: 1655: 1634: 1613: 1592: 1562: 1552: 1493: 1471: 1466: 1427: 1422: 1399: 1352: 1351: 1347:- vice versa 1339: 1338: 1324: 1307: 1306: 1297: 1288: 1287: 1215:merging any? 1212: 1208: 1206: 1198: 1189: 1184: 1170: 1149: 1139: 1131: 1114: 1097: 1077: 1060: 1031: 999: 978: 951: 939:InedibleHulk 934: 911: 903: 898: 886: 860: 859: 855: 835:petrarchan47 831: 823: 806:Merge/Delete 805: 787: 779: 756: 684: 666:and perhaps 659: 532: 505:to the log ( 498: 467: 389: 377: 371: 363: 356: 350: 344: 338: 328: 315: 226: 214: 202: 193:sockpuppetry 186: 175:; suspected 170: 156: 144: 140: 134: 126: 120: 78: 76: 60: 57: 36: 3668:) has made 3620:RedRiver660 3421:Rodney King 3209:Worldlywise 3105:KingSkyLord 2998:Sundayclose 2934:New Yorker, 2895:Zloyvolsheb 2880:Please see 2830:Zloyvolsheb 2799:Worldlywise 2787:Paula Jones 2766:Arbor to SJ 2702:Zloyvolsheb 2697:Also here: 2676:Zloyvolsheb 2389:allegations 2334:wp:ONEEVENT 2137:Zloyvolsheb 2058:(footnotes 2031:) has made 1899:WP:ONEEVENT 1878:WP:ONEEVENT 1784:Gleeanon409 1767:) has made 1731:) has made 1695:Gleeanon409 1686:WP:ONEEVENT 1618:WP:ONEEVENT 1447:Zloyvolsheb 1299:Rodney King 1245:Zloyvolsheb 1136:WP:ONEEVENT 1119:Markbassett 1048:Zloyvolsheb 1023:) has made 900:category... 895:"one event" 664:WP:ONEEVENT 541:WP:ONEEVENT 503:transcluded 392:WP:ONEEVENT 354:free images 3710:Swordman97 3591:Websurfer2 3347:Rreagan007 3170:Rreagan007 3157:Rreagan007 3042:," NBC's " 2886:Anita Hill 2822:WP:POVFORK 2670:on Reddit 2668:canvassing 2650:Franz Brod 2587:Rreagan007 2529:WP:POVFORK 2434:Gruffbenji 2367:Gruffbenji 2176:. Thanks, 2052:#Biography 1857:Netwalker3 1831:Netwalker3 1803:WP:ONEVENT 1597:an article 1362:Anita Hill 1321:Tara Reade 1179:Tara Reade 1102:Rreagan007 689:Notability 477:Tara Reade 269:Tara Reade 127:discussion 104:Tara Reade 3749:talk page 3310:Davey2116 3287:notable. 3068:USA Today 2937:Atlantic, 2517:pen names 2448:Trackinfo 2223:Trackinfo 2193:Trackinfo 2152:Trackinfo 2133:WP:PSEUDO 2114:Trackinfo 2033:few edits 1775:Moved to 1643:Starzoner 1525:WP:PSEUDO 1467:SPECIFICO 1423:SPECIFICO 1241:WP:BALASP 1185:SPECIFICO 1044:WP:BALASP 985:article. 904:one event 789:Jauerback 549:Nice4What 183:canvassed 177:canvassed 136:consensus 66:talk page 3765:Category 3751:or in a 3728:Activist 3685:Zaathras 3666:contribs 3556:Jax 0677 3389:Zapruder 3257:WP:BLP1E 3249:Redirect 3213:WP:BLP1E 3201:Redirect 3113:contribs 3048:BBC News 3023:The Hill 2990:WP:BLP1E 2965:Redirect 2797:, etc... 2754:Redirect 2317:Mr Ernie 2178:Mathglot 2166:WP:CIVIL 2096:Mathglot 2040:Comment: 1956:unsigned 1939:Mr Ernie 1743:unsigned 1578:Mathglot 1537:userdude 1503:userdude 1499:WP:BLP1E 1495:WP:BIO1E 1408:userdude 1404:Mathglot 1356:- keep ( 1315:- merge 861:Redirect 814:Reywas92 784:WP:BLP1E 761:WP:BLP1E 722:Mathglot 557:contribs 313:View log 254:glossary 215:username 209:{{subst: 203:username 197:{{subst: 187:username 181:{{subst: 171:username 165:{{subst: 68:or in a 2994:WP:SALT 2924:feature 2720:because 2483:keeping 2430:Thanks 2300:KasiaNL 1975:Deansfa 1924:Deansfa 1708:WP:NPOV 1690:WP:SALT 1622:Zoozaz1 1213:without 1207:delete 1158:Valjean 739:page.-- 668:WP:SALT 523::Online 360:WP refs 348:scholar 286:protect 281:history 231:New to 179:users: 3721:Delete 3706:WP:GNG 3527:Delete 3403:& 3395:& 3387:& 3226:(2020) 3186:(2020) 3137:(2020) 3070:, The 3062:, The 3058:, The 3019:wp:GNG 2986:Delete 2928:Times, 2678:in an 2625:Delete 2505:WP:POV 2479:merger 2452:WP:AGF 2313:Delete 2296:Delete 2203:WP:AGF 2174:WP:RUC 2170:WP:AGF 2082:) are 2044:!voted 1874:Delete 1823:Delete 1682:Delete 1635:Delete 1614:Delete 1601:Einsof 1593:Delete 1402:. Per 1400:Delete 1368:& 1360:& 1296:; [no 1150:Delete 1132:Delete 1098:Delete 1061:Delete 1032:Delete 1000:Delete 987:Cjhard 979:Delete 935:worthy 856:Delete 824:Delete 780:Delete 757:Delete 705:Ref 16 699:Ref 15 660:Delete 563:Thanks 533:Delete 507:step 3 332:Google 290:delete 3698:Merge 3677:Merge 3289:KidAd 3044:Today 2931:Post, 2606:- If 2475:merge 2088:SPSes 1829:. -- 1564:Slash 1319:into 1156:. -- 954:event 910:into 864:- to 795:dude. 695:Ref 9 687:– No 685:Merge 543:per 375:JSTOR 336:books 320:Stats 307:views 299:watch 295:links 157:Note: 79:merge 16:< 3732:talk 3689:talk 3662:talk 3649:talk 3624:talk 3604:Keep 3595:talk 3587:Keep 3578:talk 3569:Keep 3560:talk 3554:. -- 3539:talk 3504:talk 3477:talk 3459:talk 3429:talk 3405:Ford 3397:Hill 3374:talk 3351:talk 3332:talk 3323:Keep 3314:talk 3302:Keep 3293:talk 3265:talk 3255:per 3161:talk 3125:per 3123:Keep 3109:talk 3101:Keep 3092:talk 3086:."-- 3074:and 3038:," " 3015:wp:N 3002:talk 2977:talk 2946:talk 2922:but 2920:news 2899:talk 2868:talk 2862:).-- 2860:Ford 2858:and 2856:Hill 2850:and 2834:talk 2803:talk 2779:Keep 2770:talk 2739:talk 2725:Glen 2706:talk 2688:talk 2672:here 2664:Note 2654:talk 2644:per 2642:Keep 2633:talk 2616:talk 2604:Keep 2591:talk 2566:Keep 2549:talk 2491:talk 2465:talk 2446:and 2418:talk 2410:Keep 2397:talk 2371:talk 2359:Keep 2350:talk 2321:talk 2304:talk 2286:talk 2276:and 2244:Keep 2227:talk 2208:Glen 2182:talk 2168:and 2141:talk 2118:talk 2100:talk 2078:and 2029:talk 2016:talk 2007:Keep 1994:talk 1979:talk 1964:talk 1943:talk 1928:talk 1916:Keep 1907:talk 1897:per 1895:Keep 1886:talk 1882:EdJF 1861:talk 1835:talk 1801:per 1788:talk 1765:talk 1751:talk 1729:talk 1716:talk 1699:talk 1684:per 1672:talk 1656:Keep 1647:talk 1626:talk 1605:talk 1582:talk 1553:Keep 1488:and 1472:talk 1451:talk 1428:talk 1389:talk 1381:talk 1325:Cf.: 1302:blp) 1271:talk 1249:talk 1223:talk 1190:talk 1171:Keep 1162:talk 1141:Glen 1123:talk 1115:Keep 1106:talk 1089:talk 1069:talk 1052:talk 1021:talk 1008:talk 991:talk 964:talk 943:talk 933:note 920:talk 912:this 874:Talk 759:per 745:talk 726:talk 697:and 676:talk 662:per 648:talk 628:talk 608:talk 588:talk 559:) – 553:talk 513:. — 489:talk 479:and 468:Keep 454:talk 428:talk 404:talk 368:FENS 342:news 303:logs 277:talk 273:edit 3700:to 3679:to 3498:.-- 3251:to 3231:755 3203:to 3191:755 3142:755 3011:cmt 2967:to 2756:to 2682:.-- 2543:.-- 2330:cmt 2280:.-- 2084:all 1558:Red 1209:all 830:. 769:MrX 382:TWL 311:– ( 211:csp 207:or 199:csm 167:spa 141:not 81:to 3767:: 3734:) 3691:) 3664:• 3656:— 3651:) 3643:. 3635:. 3626:) 3597:) 3580:) 3562:) 3541:) 3506:) 3479:) 3461:) 3431:) 3399:, 3391:, 3376:) 3353:) 3334:) 3316:) 3295:) 3285:is 3267:) 3163:) 3115:) 3111:| 3094:) 3066:, 3027:: 3017:, 3004:) 2979:) 2948:) 2901:) 2870:) 2836:) 2805:) 2793:, 2789:, 2772:) 2741:) 2722:. 2708:) 2690:) 2656:) 2648:-- 2635:) 2618:) 2593:) 2551:) 2493:) 2467:) 2438:, 2420:) 2399:) 2373:) 2361:- 2352:) 2344:-- 2323:) 2306:) 2288:) 2253:📧 2251:● 2229:) 2205:. 2184:) 2143:) 2135:. 2120:) 2102:) 2092:29 2080:23 2076:22 2072:16 2064:29 2023:— 2018:) 1996:) 1981:) 1966:) 1945:) 1930:) 1909:) 1888:) 1863:) 1837:) 1790:) 1759:— 1753:) 1723:— 1718:) 1701:) 1674:) 1649:) 1641:. 1628:) 1616:. 1607:) 1599:. 1584:) 1527:: 1453:) 1391:) 1375:-- 1364:; 1353:C. 1350:- 1337:- 1330:; 1305:- 1289:A. 1286:- 1273:) 1251:) 1225:) 1164:) 1125:) 1108:) 1091:) 1071:) 1054:) 1015:— 1010:) 993:) 966:) 945:) 922:) 879:📧 840:คุ 786:. 772:🖋 747:) 728:) 678:) 650:) 642:. 630:) 622:. 610:) 602:. 590:) 582:. 555:· 547:. 491:) 444:. 418:. 406:) 362:) 305:| 301:| 297:| 293:| 288:| 284:| 279:| 275:| 217:}} 205:}} 195:: 189:}} 173:}} 163:: 43:. 3730:( 3687:( 3660:( 3647:( 3641:) 3637:( 3622:( 3593:( 3576:( 3558:( 3537:( 3502:( 3475:( 3457:( 3427:( 3372:( 3349:( 3330:( 3312:( 3291:( 3263:( 3159:( 3129:. 3107:( 3090:( 3000:( 2975:( 2944:( 2897:( 2866:( 2832:( 2801:( 2768:( 2737:( 2704:( 2686:( 2652:( 2631:( 2614:( 2589:( 2547:( 2489:( 2463:( 2444:: 2440:@ 2436:: 2432:@ 2416:( 2395:( 2369:( 2348:( 2319:( 2302:( 2284:( 2225:( 2195:: 2191:@ 2180:( 2154:: 2150:@ 2139:( 2116:( 2098:( 2068:8 2062:– 2060:8 2027:( 2014:( 1992:( 1977:( 1962:( 1941:( 1926:( 1905:( 1884:( 1859:( 1833:( 1805:. 1786:( 1763:( 1749:( 1727:( 1714:( 1697:( 1670:( 1645:( 1624:( 1603:( 1580:( 1449:( 1387:( 1379:( 1372:) 1344:. 1342:2 1340:B 1334:) 1323:( 1312:. 1310:1 1308:B 1269:( 1247:( 1221:( 1160:( 1121:( 1104:( 1087:( 1067:( 1050:( 1019:( 1006:( 989:( 962:( 941:( 918:( 845:ก 792:/ 743:( 724:( 674:( 646:( 626:( 606:( 586:( 568:) 566:♥ 561:( 551:( 487:( 457:) 451:( 431:) 425:( 402:( 386:) 378:· 372:· 364:· 357:· 351:· 345:· 339:· 334:( 326:( 323:) 316:· 309:) 271:( 256:) 252:( 219:. 213:| 201:| 185:| 169:| 49:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Tara Reade - Knowledge (XXG)

Index