75:
on that question, no RfC has been created, the last discussion at WT:NPERSON was in April, and AFAIK no attempts have been made to pursue this through AZ-speaking editors and so on. It is now a different time, and what made sense then does not necessarily make sense today. Patience is different than acceptance that we will leave this question unanswered indefinitely.
74:
DangerousPanda's June 1 close, mentioned below, deserves mention. I believe that it was a wise, patient close, with a prejudice toward retaining material and a Gentle Mallet of Clue suggesting that an RfC was needed on the League's status. To the best of my knowledge, discussion has completely halted
495:
This player seems to be the "victim" of discussion surrounding the professional standing of an entire league. When the article was created, it appears that consensus was that the league WAS professional. There still does not appear to be consensus that the league is NOT professional - include links
67:
I'm left with the view that any argument based on NFOOTY here is pretty weak, and I have weighted NFOOTY arguments in general here quite weakly. In addition, SNGs in general and NFOOTY in particular is usually, as a matter of textual interpretation, treated as putting the burden of proof on those
63:
In this instance, NFOOTY gives a plainly ambiguous result. Having looked to the April discussion at WT:NFOOTY, I find that while there was a consensus to remove the League from the FPL, I do not see that there is a consensus about whether the league is or isn't fully-professional, it is instead
682:
as have not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subjects have garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements. Keep votes above all make the fundamental error in assuming that the league is considered
78:
In summary, NFOOTY's result is "answer hazy", and no amount of voting in this AfD will really get to the bottom of the ambiguity. Until that ambiguity is resolved, I believe that GNG is the only meaningful policy-based measure of the notability of players from this League.
695:
was held and the consensus is that this league is not fully professional. As such, no players in this league who have not either played in a fully professional league elsewhere or played senior international football pass
334:
190:
496:
provided below that show that it is. The issue surrounding the league should be resolved through RFC once-and-for-all before additional nominations on any of the players or teams in that league as stated in here
439:
692:
603:
328:
56:. When the subject notability guidelines and general notability guidelines give different results, the community tends to weight one or the other differently depending on
563:
184:
433:
143:
583:
691:
merely shows they are part of an organisation of professional leagues, but does not show that all clubs playing the league MUST be fully professional.
150:
276:
271:
280:
116:
111:
381:
376:
263:
120:
385:
497:
349:
103:
17:
472:
368:
316:
205:
71:
In short, GNG arguments get most of the weight here. And we have unanimous consensus below that the players do not meet GNG.
454:
172:
421:
310:
786:
68:
wishing to show notability via the criteria, which further reduced the weight of keep arguments based on NFOOTY.
40:
166:
415:
306:
60:
subject notability guideline we are considering, but both are pretty much always in play in various degree.
767:
742:
713:
670:
649:
615:
595:
575:
554:
530:
509:
484:
252:
238:
162:
85:
646:
411:
758:
when it was removed without consensus and without any evidence that the league isn't fully professional.
782:
480:
356:
267:
248:
234:
36:
212:
709:
461:
83:
635:
526:
505:
447:
342:
198:
107:
372:
701:
688:
666:
643:
611:
591:
571:
550:
543:
322:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
781:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
723:
697:
679:
658:
539:
476:
259:
244:
230:
178:
700:
and are therefore reliant on GNG for notability. There is no indication of any significant
427:
763:
705:
80:
52:. The various special notability guidelines, NFOOTY included, live in tension with our
522:
518:
501:
498:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Samir_Masimov_(2nd_nomination)
99:
91:
755:
738:
684:
639:
631:
364:
224:
53:
662:
627:
607:
587:
567:
546:
402:
297:
137:
759:
638:. Furthermore there is no evidence of significant coverage, so we also have a
726:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
734:
243:
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason.
221:
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was
775:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
704:
coverage for any achievements associated with these players.
687:. The links provided above do not indicate this in any way.
754:- plays in fully professional league, that was listed at
398:
394:
390:
293:
289:
285:
133:
129:
125:
446:
341:
197:
64:
simply so far unverified either way. We don't know.
733:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
475:'s list of association football-related deletions.
604:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
789:). No further edits should be made to this page.
564:list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions
584:list of Football-related deletion discussions
542:as plays in fully professional league as per
460:
355:
227:and who has not played in a fully pro league.
211:
8:
602:Note: This debate has been included in the
582:Note: This debate has been included in the
562:Note: This debate has been included in the
471:Note: This discussion has been included in
601:
581:
561:
223:Article about a footballer who fails
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
54:general notability guideline
806:
743:01:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
714:09:52, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
671:22:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
650:11:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
630:that the Azeri league is
616:02:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
596:02:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
576:02:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
555:03:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
531:21:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
510:21:54, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
485:21:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
253:21:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
239:21:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
778:Please do not modify it.
768:17:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
86:04:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
473:WikiProject Football
229:This remains valid.
634:, so they all fail
685:FULLY professional
48:The result was
745:
626:- no evidence in
618:
598:
578:
487:
797:
780:
732:
728:
628:reliable sources
470:
465:
464:
450:
406:
388:
360:
359:
345:
301:
283:
260:Shahriyar Aliyev
216:
215:
201:
153:
141:
123:
34:
805:
804:
800:
799:
798:
796:
795:
794:
793:
787:deletion review
776:
721:
693:This discussion
407:
379:
363:
302:
274:
258:
158:
149:
114:
98:
95:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
803:
801:
792:
791:
771:
770:
748:
747:
746:
730:
729:
718:
717:
716:
673:
652:
620:
619:
599:
579:
558:
557:
533:
512:
489:
488:
467:
466:
361:
219:
218:
155:
100:Tarlan Guliyev
94:
92:Tarlan Guliyev
89:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
802:
790:
788:
784:
779:
773:
772:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
750:
749:
744:
740:
736:
731:
727:
725:
720:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
694:
690:
686:
681:
677:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
653:
651:
648:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
600:
597:
593:
589:
585:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
560:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
537:
534:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
511:
507:
503:
499:
494:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
469:
468:
463:
459:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
413:
410:
409:Find sources:
404:
400:
396:
392:
387:
383:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:Javid Tagiyev
362:
358:
354:
351:
348:
344:
340:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
308:
305:
304:Find sources:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
278:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
226:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:Find sources:
156:
152:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
93:
90:
88:
87:
84:
82:
76:
72:
69:
65:
61:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
777:
774:
751:
722:
675:
654:
636:WP:NFOOTBALL
623:
535:
514:
492:
457:
451:
443:
436:
430:
424:
418:
408:
352:
346:
338:
331:
325:
319:
313:
303:
242:
222:
220:
208:
202:
194:
187:
181:
175:
169:
159:
146:
77:
73:
70:
66:
62:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
702:non-routine
676:Delete both
493:Strong keep
477:Sir Sputnik
434:free images
329:free images
245:Sir Sputnik
231:Sir Sputnik
185:free images
706:Fenix down
624:Delete all
81:j⚛e decker
50:delete all
783:talk page
698:WP:NFOOTY
680:WP:NFOOTY
659:WP:NFOOTY
642:failure.
632:fully-pro
608:• Gene93k
588:• Gene93k
568:• Gene93k
540:WP:NFOOTY
523:NovaSkola
519:Yacatisma
502:Yacatisma
37:talk page
785:or in a
724:Relisted
144:View log
39:or in a
678:- Fail
663:Janavar
647:Snowman
547:Nicat49
440:WP refs
428:scholar
382:protect
377:history
335:WP refs
323:scholar
277:protect
272:history
191:WP refs
179:scholar
117:protect
112:history
756:WP:FPL
640:WP:GNG
538:Meets
412:Google
386:delete
307:Google
281:delete
225:WP:GNG
163:Google
121:delete
760:Nfitz
644:Giant
455:JSTOR
416:books
403:views
395:watch
391:links
350:JSTOR
311:books
298:views
290:watch
286:links
206:JSTOR
167:books
151:Stats
138:views
130:watch
126:links
58:which
16:<
764:talk
752:Keep
739:talk
710:talk
689:This
667:talk
657:per
655:Keep
612:talk
592:talk
572:talk
551:talk
536:Keep
527:talk
517:per
515:Keep
506:talk
481:talk
448:FENS
422:news
399:logs
373:talk
369:edit
343:FENS
317:news
294:logs
268:talk
264:edit
249:talk
235:talk
199:FENS
173:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
735:Mz7
661:.--
521:.--
462:TWL
357:TWL
213:TWL
142:– (
766:)
741:)
712:)
669:)
614:)
606:.
594:)
586:.
574:)
566:.
553:)
545:.
529:)
508:)
500:--
483:)
442:)
401:|
397:|
393:|
389:|
384:|
380:|
375:|
371:|
337:)
296:|
292:|
288:|
284:|
279:|
275:|
270:|
266:|
251:)
237:)
193:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
79:--
762:(
737:(
708:(
665:(
610:(
590:(
570:(
549:(
525:(
504:(
479:(
458:·
452:·
444:·
437:·
431:·
425:·
419:·
414:(
405:)
367:(
353:·
347:·
339:·
332:·
326:·
320:·
314:·
309:(
300:)
262:(
247:(
233:(
217:)
209:·
203:·
195:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
165:(
157:(
154:)
147:·
140:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.