180:. The assertion was present, but sources were absent. I'm still not completely convinced, but I may change my mind in light of some of this. That's a big may. Just because NBC or whatnot had a few things from one of their events is not a notability thing, since the local news has recorded various dumb things around my own city that would never get in the Wiki. Also want to add: Monkeyfloop has removed this nomination from the AfD page, though that's been reverted. Please don't. --
149:. When an article claims things like "First Pro Team to win the World Cup"; "Series Titles..." and then a list of multiple world championships, I can't understand why you would state that you are "not seeing any notability". The assertion of notability is there in spades. Here's my two second google results: "The WB and CBS, channels 5 and 8, actually shot some staged play by local Professional teams XSV and
271:
non notable team of a non notable sport. Is paintball even organized to the level that there can be professional teams in the true sense of the word? I doubt it. At the very best, this article would be be best merged into an article on paintball but I would even disagree with that. Delete based on
337:
Strothra please do research on the sport before you ask if it is organized. Also maybe turn on ESPN 2 sometime. They are showing one of the world's biggest
Paintball Tournaments right now. And also Oliver Lang (who is mentioned in my article) makes 100,000$ a year playing paintball. I'm pretty
347:
Strothra, how about www.pbstar.com I think that this is sufficient "notability" for you. Look at all the videos on that site, See how many tournaments have been played by how many people? See all the
Locations for the tournaments? New Orleans, Huntington Beach, Tampa, Austin, LA, Paris, London,
432:
This article does seem to have POV issues, but that can be easily fixed by editing the article. And please people, it is much easier to do basic research before putting an article for deletion. And if something seems to have a biased POV you can fix it to become a better artical, remember
384:
How are the sources not primary? They come off of the teams official website. That makes absolutely no since to me. Since a primary source is about someone who was actually there, these people were actually there and this is their website thats primary in my opinion.
225:
This is a REAL PROFESSIONAL PAINTBALL TEAM! Not MonkeyFloop's Team... Yes, it is considered one of the best in the world. Honestly, do some reasearch on the matter before deleting it, how ignorant can you people be. www.google.com And put in "Dynasty
Paintball"
64:
It reads like it's just some paintball team that has won some odd tournaments. I'm not seeing any notability. I had it speedy nominated, but the author removed that, so I'm doing it the hard way. Anyone else want to chime in? Edit:
252:, professional sports teams would appear to be notable under any circumstances, even for minority sports such as paintball. However I couldn't find specific notability guidelines for sport so I base this more or less on
316:
Well, What do you know? It seems that when you input "Dynasty" into google, that the first search result seems to be "Dynasty
Paintball" Hmmm... I think that that's enough credibility... Dont you?
136:
Actually its not my team. And i said its greatly considered to be the best in the world. And thats fact just look at the stats that they have. What else can i do to make it a real "article"
367:. Some non-primary sources mentioning Team Dynasty or the paintball tournaments they've been involved in would still be appreciable though; especially some more general news / sports news. --
127:
as completely non-notable, vanity, and highly POV. Please, do show us the independent, reliable sources that describe your team as the best team in the world. --
108:
Please sign your comments with ~~~~. Also, please point out why the group is notable, ie. why it deserves an article in a general encyclopedia. --
145:. True, the article needs some sources, but they are easily verifiable, as easy as googling to show some other prima facie cruft or neologism is
406:), but I'd like to see some mention of they or the tournaments they've been in outside of their own website or the tournament's own website. --
402:
affiliated with the team. Those are more objective by nature. Like I said, it seems like they meet the notability requirements (hence my
17:
99:
192:
I don't understand what else i could do to prove this is worth being an article. Look here if you want to be shown its legit.
210:
411:
372:
185:
113:
74:
452:
161:
36:
451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
407:
368:
181:
109:
70:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
297:
260:
313:
87:
205:
437:
424:
415:
376:
358:
329:
317:
300:
276:
263:
240:
227:
215:
172:
131:
117:
95:
78:
52:
237:
169:
49:
273:
58:
294:
257:
355:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
286:
156:; "Dynasty are the reigning champions of the NPPL and PSP circuits" @ about.com's listing of
386:
339:
195:
137:
91:
290:
253:
154:
128:
83:
I disagree. I'll put my sources on the page so that it will be better. how about that?
434:
326:
256:. Problematically, most or all of the existing content appears to be a copyvio.
165:
153:...NBC will be here TODAY filming several live shots from 3:30 - 6:30 pm."
236:
Comment: Please attempt to argue the merits instead of insulting people.--
157:
348:
Amsterdam, Barcelona, Bangkok, Shanghai... How is that for "notability"?
325:, notable team of a notable sport. Please make an effort to be civil.
314:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=dynasty&btnG=Google+Search
433:
constructive criticism is better than just saying something is wrong.
193:
445:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
293:. Convince me that VSCA has precedence and I'll change my vote.
204:. Appears to meet notability for a professional team. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
455:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
394:. Ye've flipped it. I said I wanted
398:sources. These are sites that are
338:sure that's professional enough.
24:
354:The Research speaks for itself.
285:I have no doubt that this is a
423:Yes, I will be adding some...
289:case, but it apparently meets
1:
44:The result of the debate was
158:Professional Paintball Teams
472:
448:Please do not modify it.
438:09:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
416:17:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
377:02:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
359:02:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
330:23:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
301:13:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
277:13:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
264:10:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
241:21:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
216:21:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
173:20:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
132:20:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
118:20:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
79:20:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
53:16:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
312:A non-notable team?
408:Consumed Crustacean
369:Consumed Crustacean
182:Consumed Crustacean
110:Consumed Crustacean
71:Consumed Crustacean
272:POV and vanity. --
363:I'll roll with a
214:
104:
90:comment added by
463:
450:
208:
103:
84:
34:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
459:
453:deletion review
446:
238:Fuhghettaboutit
170:Fuhghettaboutit
85:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
469:
467:
458:
457:
441:
440:
427:
418:
389:
379:
361:
349:
342:
332:
320:
306:
305:
304:
303:
295:Angus McLellan
280:
279:
266:
258:Angus McLellan
246:
245:
244:
243:
231:
230:
219:
218:
206:badlydrawnjeff
190:
189:
175:
140:
134:
121:
120:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
456:
454:
449:
443:
442:
439:
436:
431:
428:
426:
425:71.96.163.107
422:
419:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
388:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
360:
357:
353:
350:
346:
343:
341:
336:
333:
331:
328:
324:
321:
319:
318:71.96.163.107
315:
311:
308:
307:
302:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
275:
270:
269:Strong Delete
267:
265:
262:
259:
255:
251:
248:
247:
242:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
229:
228:71.96.163.107
224:
221:
220:
217:
212:
207:
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
187:
183:
179:
176:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
148:
144:
141:
139:
135:
133:
130:
126:
125:Strong delete
123:
122:
119:
115:
111:
107:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
81:
80:
76:
72:
68:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
447:
444:
429:
420:
403:
399:
395:
391:
381:
364:
356:Living large
351:
344:
334:
322:
309:
268:
249:
222:
201:
191:
177:
160:; more info
150:
146:
142:
124:
86:— Preceding
82:
66:
63:
59:Team Dynasty
50:Sam Blanning
45:
43:
31:
28:
396:non-primary
387:Monkeyfloop
340:Monkeyfloop
196:Monkeyfloop
147:not notable
138:Monkeyfloop
92:Monkeyfloop
129:Kicking222
435:Smile Lee
404:weak keep
365:Weak Keep
211:WP:MEMES?
327:Silensor
274:Strothra
100:contribs
88:unsigned
421:Comment
392:Comment
345:Comment
335:Comment
310:Comment
287:WP:VSCA
178:Comment
151:Dynasty
67:No vote
298:(Talk)
291:WP:BIO
261:(Talk)
254:WP:BIO
16:<
430:Keep
412:Talk
382:0_o?
373:Talk
352:Keep
323:Keep
250:Keep
223:Keep
202:Keep
186:Talk
168:. --
166:here
164:and
162:here
143:Keep
114:Talk
96:talk
75:Talk
48:. --
46:keep
400:not
69:--
414:|
410:|
375:|
371:|
184:|
116:|
112:|
102:)
98:•
77:|
73:|
213:)
209:(
188:|
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.