Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Tease and denial - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

650:. DGG has found sources about the topic, however they are not cited in the article, which is unsourced and so we don't know whether the content matches the sources. Consequently, the content should be suppressed until it is made verifiable to readers by inline citations. As this is contested content by virtue of this AfD, it must be sourced or removed per 363:
You have misinterpreted me. The internet is biased toward pornographic content itself (for masturbation). Searching for "porn" is more likely to yield more results like that than encyclopedic content, news articles or studies about pornography as a phenomenon. It is hard to find reliable sources for
312:
shows some results. Reliable sources for the topic are hard to find because of search engines' bias towards pornography instead of encyclopedic content and social stigma on pornography that prevents that more serious studies about the topic become known. Some references might be added in the future,
419:
I'm not suggesting it is an urban dictionary at all. I really think that the article is useful and encyclopedic, but seriously lacking reliable sources. But that issue can be fixed. I'm sure those sources exist and an expert in human sexuality would be able to find them. I can say that by comparing
654:. Also, the two articles are about the same topic as far as I can tell. We need only one. Ideally, one is redirected to another, which is then reduced to a sourced stub to remove all the unsourced content, and it can grow back from there to the extent editors cite sources for any additions. 331:
This is wikipeda-en, not wikipeida-en-porn. If a term is widely used, one would expect there to be many references. Whether or not search engines have a porn bias (a concept i reject as the Internet 's backbone was built on porn) is irrelevant. There are many many "porn" terms that
182: 309: 565: 449:
Most modern sex advice books are likely to discuss it. They do have to be found, though - . A quick G-scholar search (without even trying for synonymous phrases) finds: Gentry, Cynthia W.
135: 176: 451:
What Women Really Want in Bed: The Surprising Secrets Women Wish Men Knew About Sex.'. Beverly, MA: Quiver, 2010 isbn 9781592333394 ' p. 17 ; Gregg Norris
408: 352: 284: 233: 142: 463:. Pompton Plains, N.J.: Limelight editions, 2007. among the less standard literature is FetishDiva Midori, Linda Santiman, and Steve Diet Goedde. 56:. Arguments over whether or not this term is widely used are irrelevant. The relevant issue is whether or not this subject is differenct from 108: 103: 112: 459:
New York, NY : Perigee Book, ©2011, isbn 9780399536946 ; D. Mainon, "A New Kind of Girl" p.277-91 in Silver, Alain, and James Ursini.
506:
ESD covers the subject, and the references provided by DGG can be applied to improve that article. Also, a redirect or improvement to
17: 95: 197: 404: 348: 280: 229: 164: 685: 40: 336:
have articles. At the moment there is no potential, nor is any likely to develop. The ESD article will do fine.
158: 61: 393: 337: 269: 218: 666: 634: 609: 577: 556: 527: 498: 478: 429: 414: 381: 358: 326: 290: 263: 239: 77: 510:
will get readers to the right place. What this article (along with other similar articles) might become is a
154: 630: 552: 425: 377: 322: 71: 314: 681: 204: 99: 36: 540: 511: 647: 622: 523: 514:, and a single article such as ESD allows editors to follow one page, not multiple. Finally, we have 250: 214: 57: 53: 372:
too, since it is a widely used term. It would be better just to wait until someone digs them up. --
254: 246: 190: 588: 626: 548: 421: 373: 368:
for that reason. But somehow they managed to do it. I'm sure there are some reliable sources for
318: 66: 573: 170: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
680:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
369: 305: 301: 91: 83: 544: 515: 519: 657: 604: 494: 487:, clear evidence of significant coverage among multiple different secondary sources. — 261: 651: 474: 467:
Los Angeles, CA: Daedalus, 2005. There are also works of fiction (see Google Books)
569: 365: 129: 539:- No, these articles do not cover the subject, the article for deletion is not a 465:
Wild Side Sex: The Book of Kink : Educational, Sensual, and Entertaining Essays.
453:
Glossary of BDSM (Bondage, Discipline, Dominance, Submission, Sadism, Masochism)
591:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
625:. The two topics are insufficiently different to merit separate articles. -- 600: 489: 469: 317:. And the current state is actually not bad, just lacks references. -- 507: 674:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
245:
Could you clarify which article it duplicates? The page for
213:
Notability is not established. Content is duplicative of
566:
list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
392:
of its use. This isn't urban dictionary is my point.
125: 121: 117: 189: 598:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 203: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 688:). No further edits should be made to this page. 308:pornographic websites. A search for the term on 60:. No case has been made for that and hence the 547:. Please read carefully my comments above. -- 388:If it is a widely used term, there should be 8: 564:Note: This debate has been included in the 420:it with similar, but successful articles. -- 457:The Book of Kink: Sex Beyond the Missionary 563: 253:where the nominated page is split from? 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 249:doesn't seem to exist. Do you mean 217:. Sourcing is also problematic. 24: 1: 635:12:52, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 610:11:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 578:16:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 557:22:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 528:16:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 499:05:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 479:21:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 430:20:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 415:16:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 382:16:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 359:10:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 327:04:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 300:- The term is widely used in 291:17:32, 15 February 2013 (UTC) 264:17:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC) 240:14:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC) 543:, and my arguments were not 705: 667:09:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 78:23:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 677:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 64:argument has the day. 648:Erotic sexual denial 623:Erotic sexual denial 461:Gangster Film Reader 251:Erotic sexual denial 215:erotic sexual denial 58:erotic sexual denial 54:Erotic sexual denial 409:central scrutinizer 353:central scrutinizer 285:central scrutinizer 234:central scrutinizer 518:considerations. – 665: 612: 580: 455:; Eva Christina, 696: 679: 664: 662: 655: 608: 597: 593: 413: 412: 411: 399: 396: 370:Tease and denial 357: 356: 355: 343: 340: 289: 288: 287: 275: 272: 259: 238: 237: 236: 224: 221: 208: 207: 193: 145: 133: 115: 92:Tease and denial 84:Tease and denial 74: 69: 62:WP:NOTDICTIONARY 48:The result was 34: 704: 703: 699: 698: 697: 695: 694: 693: 692: 686:deletion review 675: 658: 656: 599: 586: 403: 402: 401: 397: 394: 347: 346: 345: 341: 338: 279: 278: 277: 273: 270: 255: 228: 227: 226: 222: 219: 150: 141: 106: 90: 87: 72: 67: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 702: 700: 691: 690: 670: 669: 637: 615: 614: 613: 595: 594: 583: 582: 581: 561: 560: 559: 531: 530: 501: 482: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 407: 351: 295: 294: 293: 283: 232: 211: 210: 147: 86: 81: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 701: 689: 687: 683: 678: 672: 671: 668: 663: 661: 653: 649: 645: 641: 638: 636: 632: 628: 627:Colapeninsula 624: 620: 617: 616: 611: 606: 602: 596: 592: 590: 585: 584: 579: 575: 571: 567: 562: 558: 554: 550: 549:Hugo Spinelli 546: 542: 538: 535: 534: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 502: 500: 496: 492: 491: 486: 483: 481: 480: 476: 472: 471: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 445: 444: 431: 427: 423: 422:Hugo Spinelli 418: 417: 416: 410: 406: 400: 398:green rosetta 391: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 379: 375: 374:Hugo Spinelli 371: 367: 362: 361: 360: 354: 350: 344: 342:green rosetta 335: 330: 329: 328: 324: 320: 319:Hugo Spinelli 316: 311: 307: 303: 299: 296: 292: 286: 282: 276: 274:green rosetta 267: 266: 265: 262: 260: 258: 252: 248: 247:erotic denial 244: 243: 242: 241: 235: 231: 225: 223:green rosetta 216: 206: 202: 199: 196: 192: 188: 184: 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 156: 153: 152:Find sources: 148: 144: 140: 137: 131: 127: 123: 119: 114: 110: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 88: 85: 82: 80: 79: 76: 75: 70: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 676: 673: 659: 643: 639: 618: 587: 536: 503: 488: 484: 468: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 389: 366:autofellatio 364:topics like 333: 315:WP:POTENTIAL 297: 256: 212: 200: 194: 186: 179: 173: 167: 161: 151: 138: 65: 49: 47: 31: 28: 512:WP:NOTHOWTO 313:but it has 268:Corrected 177:free images 660:Sandstein 682:talk page 605:talk page 570:• Gene93k 37:talk page 684:or in a 644:redirect 621:back to 589:Relisted 390:evidence 136:View log 68:Spinning 50:REDIRECT 39:or in a 537:Comment 520:S. Rich 183:WP refs 171:scholar 109:protect 104:history 640:Delete 545:WP:OSE 541:how to 516:WP:OSE 504:Delete 405:(talk) 395:little 349:(talk) 339:little 310:Amazon 306:fetish 302:femdom 281:(talk) 271:little 230:(talk) 220:little 155:Google 113:delete 619:Merge 508:Tease 475:talk 257:Funny 198:JSTOR 159:books 143:Stats 130:views 122:watch 118:links 73:Spark 16:< 652:WP:V 631:talk 601:J04n 574:talk 553:talk 524:talk 495:talk 490:Cirt 485:Keep 447:Keep 426:talk 378:talk 323:talk 304:and 298:Keep 191:FENS 165:news 126:logs 100:talk 96:edit 646:to 642:or 470:DGG 205:TWL 134:– ( 52:to 633:) 576:) 568:. 555:) 526:) 497:) 477:) 428:) 380:) 334:do 325:) 185:) 128:| 124:| 120:| 116:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 629:( 607:) 603:( 572:( 551:( 522:( 493:( 473:( 424:( 376:( 321:( 209:) 201:· 195:· 187:· 180:· 174:· 168:· 162:· 157:( 149:( 146:) 139:· 132:) 94:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Erotic sexual denial
erotic sexual denial
WP:NOTDICTIONARY
Spinning
Spark
23:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Tease and denial
Tease and denial
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.