258:. Glad to hear that there are plenty of references. Which would you say are the most important ones for this article? Perhaps you would care to replace some of the "citation needed" tags with appropriate references to reliable sources. Thanks.
297:. I'm glad that TI has many proud supporters, but I am not sure that is relevant here. The underlying issue here is one of reliable sources. On the basis of published reviews probably the most notable book on technocracy in the USA is Akin's
408:
was clearly notable once. That other possibly more notable related groups do not have articles is best interpreted as evidence that we need to make them. As the nom. is familiar with the subject, perhaps he should do so.
162:
277:
The organization is still in existence, and even has a number of supporters who have established a YouTube presence. While the group is 76 years old, there are still those who proudly display the
Technocracy monad.
235:
Somewhat faded now, but was a notable organization in its time. Established 76 years ago. There are plenty of references. Articles can certainly be written on the two red links cited. •••
156:
430:
This is an historically important subject and technocracy Inc. is the main technocracy organisation so any article on technocracy will need an article on
Technocracy Inc.
117:
90:
85:
94:
122:
77:
244:
177:
144:
17:
206:
197:
was formed in 1933, after
Technocracy's heyday, and when viewed in historical context is probably less important than the
138:
81:
439:
420:
397:
361:
337:
310:
287:
267:
248:
226:
59:
134:
454:
36:
184:
453:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
194:
73:
65:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
352:. Nothing reliably sourced and independently notable in this article that can't be included in the overview.
198:
240:
193:
Non-notable, and there has been considerable difficulty in finding reliable sources for this article.
150:
349:
214:
202:
170:
213:), neither of which has a WP article. An adequate overview of all these groups is provided in the
435:
333:
236:
380:
306:
283:
263:
222:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
371:
320:
55:
431:
416:
357:
329:
302:
279:
259:
218:
111:
210:
50:
411:
353:
301:, but it has relatively little to say about Technocracy Incorporated.
374:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
323:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
447:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
169:
379:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
328:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
457:). No further edits should be made to this page.
183:
8:
7:
207:Continental Committee on Technocracy
299:Technocracy and the American Dream
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
362:01:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
338:00:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
311:06:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
288:00:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
268:00:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
249:23:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
227:00:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
440:10:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
421:23:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
398:15:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
60:18:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
474:
450:Please do not modify it.
199:Committee on Technocracy
195:Technocracy Incorporated
74:Technocracy Incorporated
66:Technocracy Incorporated
32:Please do not modify it.
350:Technocracy movement
215:Technocracy movement
203:Columbia University
44:The result was
400:
340:
465:
452:
395:
378:
376:
327:
325:
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
473:
472:
468:
467:
466:
464:
463:
462:
461:
455:deletion review
448:
391:
387:
381:
369:
318:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
471:
469:
460:
459:
443:
442:
424:
423:
402:
401:
389:
385:
377:
366:
365:
364:
346:Redirect/Merge
342:
341:
326:
315:
314:
313:
291:
290:
271:
270:
252:
251:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
470:
458:
456:
451:
445:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
425:
422:
418:
414:
413:
407:
404:
403:
399:
396:
394:
393:
392:
375:
373:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
324:
322:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
276:
273:
272:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:Life of Riley
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
449:
446:
427:
410:
405:
384:
383:
382:
370:
345:
319:
298:
294:
274:
255:
232:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
211:Harold Loeb
157:free images
388:rbitrarily
205:) and the
201:(based at
217:article.
432:Isenhand
372:Relisted
330:Tim Song
321:Relisted
209:(led by
118:View log
303:Johnfos
295:Comment
280:Unidyne
260:Johnfos
256:Comment
219:Johnfos
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
135:Google
95:delete
428:Keep.
417:talk
348:into
275:Keep.
233:Keep.
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
436:talk
406:Keep
358:talk
334:talk
307:talk
284:talk
264:talk
223:talk
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
46:keep
412:DGG
354:THF
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
438:)
419:)
360:)
336:)
309:)
286:)
266:)
247:)
225:)
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
434:(
415:(
390:0
386:A
356:(
332:(
305:(
282:(
262:(
245:C
243:–
241:T
239:(
221:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.