Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Terms used in the creation-evolution debate - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

50: 160:. Qualifies for deletion as unsuitable for Knowledge (XXG), since it is an attempt to circumvent AfDs that are in the process of being decided by the community against 168: 150: 141: 113: 101: 90: 77: 53: 146:
What about "Such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article" or "Article duplicates information in some other article"? --
17: 183: 36: 59: 164:'s wishes. Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox, and attempting to circumvent consensus decisions is abuse of the first water. -- 70: 131: 182:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
74: 110: 165: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
123: 119: 73:
page and we don't need to start new pages for creationists to illustrate their own ideas.
49: 135: 45: 161: 87: 66: 147: 98: 126:, vanity, advertising, spam, hoax, patent nonsense, vandalism. Therefore, 44:
The result of the debate was userfied as requested by Ed Poor. --
176:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:
nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
186:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 118:Does not appear to be any of the following: 65:The page is yet another POV-fork attempt by 60:Terms used in the creation-evolution debate 69:. This distinction is already made on the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 48: 169:04:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 151:23:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 142:22:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 114:20:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 102:20:23, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 91:20:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 78:19:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 71:creation-evolution controversy 1: 54:00:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 203: 179:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 37:Votes for Undeletion 184:undeletion request 132:Wp deletion policy 124:original research 120:Unsuitable for Wp 194: 181: 52: 34: 202: 201: 197: 196: 195: 193: 192: 191: 190: 177: 140: 86:per nominator. 75:Joshuaschroeder 63: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 200: 198: 189: 188: 172: 171: 155: 154: 153: 138: 116: 111:Daedalus-Prime 104: 93: 62: 57: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 199: 187: 185: 180: 174: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 156: 152: 149: 145: 144: 143: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 115: 112: 108: 105: 103: 100: 97: 94: 92: 89: 85: 82: 81: 80: 79: 76: 72: 68: 61: 58: 56: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 178: 175: 162:User:Ed Poor 157: 127: 106: 95: 83: 67:User:Ed_Poor 64: 43: 31: 28: 109:per nom. -- 136:goethean 46:Phroziac 88:Pilatus 158:Delete 148:Ec5618 107:Delete 96:Delete 84:Delete 99:CalJW 16:< 134:. -- 130:per 128:keep 166:FOo 122:, 139:ॐ

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
Votes for Undeletion
Phroziac

00:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Terms used in the creation-evolution debate
User:Ed_Poor
creation-evolution controversy
Joshuaschroeder
19:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Pilatus
20:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
CalJW
20:23, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Daedalus-Prime
20:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Unsuitable for Wp
original research
Wp deletion policy
goethean
22:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Ec5618
23:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
User:Ed Poor
FOo
04:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
undeletion request

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.