185:
Subjectivism begun by
Descartes." Et cetera. Putting aside linguistic oddities in the phrasing, his philosophical endeavor may or may not be impressive -- but none of it is sourced. Or on film: "After Baumgarten, he thinks that beauty is the sensitivitical argument on truth. To explain this, he turned his attention to Diagogue in film instead of Dialogue and found Diactic instead of Plato's Dialectic. This Diagogue exists not only between the persons in a film but also between the filmmaker and the audience, so that the T Grand Structure of film consist of both Diagogues." When I turn
666:. My opinion is that no evidence has been adduced for any claim made in the article for more than humdrum notability. This claim of mine itself has no evidence, but of its nature it need not and indeed cannot have evidence; on the other hand, it could easily be refuted if evidence existed. Now, which of the nine criteria of
184:
Sumioka "is a philosopher, film theorist (Film
Grammar and Media Business), and creator", we're told. "In consequence of Wittgenstein's Language game and Speech act of Ordinary language philosophy, he studied Ontology of Act and Agent of Act from the aspect of Logic against the Epistemology of modern
189:
attention to film I tend to see formulaic plots, gruesome dialogue and, if the film is
Japanese, formulaic/hammy acting; but I don't claim significance for my insights. If significance is claimed for Sumioka's insights, I want to see some signs of a secondary literature about them. Neither Google
573:
I do not know what you are talking about. What "story on 'Diagogue' and the 'T Grand
Structure'" have I, or has anyone, deleted? Or do you mean the Knowledge articles on "Diactic", "Spiral Up Structure", "Action line" and "Multicoverage" that were deleted as a result of
401:
as a basic propaganda piece, original research, advertisement, and rife with information from primary sources only. This also appears to be a spam campaign across multiple
Knowledge projects. I can find nothing which verifies notability per
190:
Scholar nor Google Books provides such signs. True, I only searched for the man at those two via the roman alphabet; when I look in
Japanese, I see stuff by him, retailers' adverts for his books, and bloggery; I see nothing substantive.
362:
Good, and I see that you have already started to add more sources to the article. I wonder, though, if there are independent sources for (e.g. discussions or at least mentions by other scholars of) his theoretical insights. --
153:
212:
when he works? No reliable, independent source yet adduced says anything about his insights, let alone that they have had much effect on anyone other than
Sumioka himself. So what might be notable is not referenced. --
643:
As well as an article without source, any opinion without evidence is nothing in
Knowledge. Now, reliable sources are fulfiled. Then, without prejudice, check WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. Enough, so we have to
434:
517:
Sumioka is cited as the authority for the assertion that ζ η»γ¨εγγγγ«γγγθ¦γ¦γγθ
γ«δ½γζγδΌγγγγγ¨γδΌγγγ¨γγγγ¨γ§ε
±ιγγ¦γγγη¬γγ«γ€γγ¦θγγοΌγη¬γγ«γγγ¦γ―γγγͺγγ¨γγͺγγγεε¨γγοΌ(I regret to say that the meaning of this statement eludes me.)
147:
110:
259:
670:
does
Sumioka meet? (Please don't say that as a ζζ he has met criterion 6: a typical Japanese university has hundreds of ζζ.) And which of the five criteria of
532:
341:
233:
285:
83:
78:
87:
114:
70:
575:
583:
507:
What appears to be a PDF derivative of a
Powerpoint or similar presentation. At the end, this lists this book by Sumioka among its sources.
663:
168:
527:
Somebody's course description. A different book by Sumioka is one of the nine sources he says he'll refer to in his twelfth lecture.
135:
201:
for one claim in it; I inferred a rejection of the notion that the subject wasn't notable and therefore removed the prod notice.
17:
414:
533:
http://www4.kokugakuin.ac.jp/syllabus2009.nsf/1dffb8e30522fa7e49256e5d0007b791/ce3ba680964a9bf14925757d0012c4c9?OpenDocument
342:
http://www4.kokugakuin.ac.jp/syllabus2009.nsf/1dffb8e30522fa7e49256e5d0007b791/ce3ba680964a9bf14925757d0012c4c9?OpenDocument
129:
204:
We have reliable sources to back up the claims that Sumioka has worked, or is working, here and there. These claims are
683:
657:
638:
620:
599:
568:
552:
462:
449:
424:
393:
372:
356:
300:
274:
248:
222:
52:
125:
74:
700:
36:
699:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
445:
175:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
512:
331:
653:
564:
352:
66:
58:
482:
460:
316:
472:
311:
497:
Course description by another teacher, in which he lists this book by Sumioka as one to which he'll refer.
634:
560:
559:
What you cannot see is the very story on "Diagogue" and the "T Grand Structure" that you have deleted.--
348:
502:
326:
616:
141:
441:
161:
537:
Another course description. This second book by Sumioka is listed as one of the 18 he'll refer to.
649:
456:
420:
388:
455:
Can someone enlighten us as to the contents of the sources? I don't speak or read Japanese. -
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
671:
630:
679:
612:
595:
548:
368:
296:
270:
244:
218:
197:
but Roundthetwist (the latest in a series of SPAs to have shown interest in this article)
522:
336:
578:? (English-language Knowledge has never had an article on "T Grand Structure", although
667:
587:
492:
407:
403:
383:
321:
104:
49:
675:
591:
544:
364:
292:
266:
240:
214:
513:
http://vision.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp/japanese/happyou/pdf/Kuroda_2009_P_241.pdf
332:
http://vision.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp/japanese/happyou/pdf/Kuroda_2009_P_241.pdf
483:
https://qir.kyushu-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2324/10324/1/11_appendix1.pdf
317:
https://qir.kyushu-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2324/10324/1/11_appendix1.pdf
473:
https://qir.kyushu-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2324/10324/7/05_chapter2.pdf
312:
https://qir.kyushu-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2324/10324/7/05_chapter2.pdf
586:
the notion and Sumioka do get a mention within the convoluted article
477:
Chapter 2 of an identified book. It cites "Sumioka 2005" at one point.
503:
http://www.kisc.meiji.ac.jp/~takamasa/subsemi/index.files/odoru2.pdf
327:
http://www.kisc.meiji.ac.jp/~takamasa/subsemi/index.files/odoru2.pdf
382:
per nominator. Non-notable. I couldn't find any reliable source.
693:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
435:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
487:
Bibliography of this same book, identifying "Sumioka 2005".
307:
However, only as academic I found them at once in google.
579:
198:
194:
100:
96:
92:
523:
http://www.meiji.ac.jp/isc/syllabus/bodies/yoro-g.html
337:
http://www.meiji.ac.jp/isc/syllabus/bodies/yoro-g.html
160:
493:http://www2.meijo.ac.jp/kato/2008/ok2008_films.htm
322:http://www2.meijo.ac.jp/kato/2008/ok2008_films.htm
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
703:). No further edits should be made to this page.
629:. Couldn't find any evidence of notability. ββ
260:list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions
174:
8:
429:
280:
254:
234:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
228:
286:list of Film-related deletion discussions
433:: This debate has been included in the
284:: This debate has been included in the
258:: This debate has been included in the
232:: This debate has been included in the
555:revised 14:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
7:
611:. Seems to be little of substance.
24:
648:by the guideline. That is all.--
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
208:not of interest. What does he
1:
684:08:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
658:15:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
639:10:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
621:10:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
53:16:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
600:01:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
569:23:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
553:10:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
463:09:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
450:06:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
425:06:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
394:04:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
373:14:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
357:14:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
301:13:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
275:13:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
249:13:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
223:13:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
720:
696:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
468:Here's the list above:
67:Teruaki Georges Sumioka
59:Teruaki Georges Sumioka
195:prodded the article
44:The result was
674:does he meet? --
452:
438:
423:
392:
303:
289:
277:
263:
251:
237:
711:
698:
439:
421:Talk to Nihonjoe
417:
413:
410:
386:
290:
264:
238:
179:
178:
164:
108:
90:
34:
719:
718:
714:
713:
712:
710:
709:
708:
707:
701:deletion review
694:
415:
408:
121:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
717:
715:
706:
705:
689:
688:
687:
686:
641:
624:
605:
604:
603:
602:
588:Implied author
584:Janine Garnier
541:
540:
539:
538:
530:
529:
528:
520:
519:
518:
510:
509:
508:
500:
499:
498:
490:
489:
488:
480:
479:
478:
466:
465:
453:
442:David Eppstein
427:
396:
376:
375:
345:
344:
339:
334:
329:
324:
319:
314:
305:
304:
278:
252:
199:added a source
182:
181:
118:
115:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
716:
704:
702:
697:
691:
690:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
655:
651:
650:Gunpowderrice
647:
642:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
622:
618:
614:
610:
607:
606:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
561:Roundthetwist
558:
557:
556:
554:
550:
546:
536:
535:
534:
531:
526:
525:
524:
521:
516:
515:
514:
511:
506:
505:
504:
501:
496:
495:
494:
491:
486:
485:
484:
481:
476:
475:
474:
471:
470:
469:
464:
461:
458:
454:
451:
447:
443:
436:
432:
428:
426:
422:
418:
411:
405:
400:
399:Strong delete
397:
395:
390:
385:
381:
380:Strong delete
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
349:Roundthetwist
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
309:
308:
302:
298:
294:
287:
283:
279:
276:
272:
268:
261:
257:
253:
250:
246:
242:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
211:
207:
206:by themselves
202:
200:
196:
191:
188:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
119:
116:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
695:
692:
645:
626:
608:
542:
467:
430:
398:
379:
346:
306:
281:
255:
229:
209:
205:
203:
192:
186:
183:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
45:
43:
31:
28:
631:Phoenix7777
148:free images
664:new editor
613:Xxanthippe
576:this "AfD"
672:WP:AUTHOR
662:Welcome,
193:Nihonjoe
384:Oda Mari
111:View log
668:WP:PROF
646:KEEP IT
154:WPΒ refs
142:scholar
84:protect
79:history
627:Delete
609:Delete
590:.) --
580:thanks
404:WP:BIO
126:Google
88:delete
50:Secret
46:delete
676:Hoary
592:Hoary
545:Hoary
406:. Β·Β·Β·
365:Hoary
293:Hoary
267:Hoary
241:Hoary
215:Hoary
169:JSTOR
130:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
680:talk
654:talk
635:talk
617:talk
596:talk
565:talk
549:talk
446:talk
431:Note
389:talk
369:talk
353:talk
297:talk
282:Note
271:talk
256:Note
245:talk
230:Note
219:talk
162:FENS
136:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
582:to
543:--
457:Mgm
409:ζ₯ζ¬η©£
176:TWL
113:β’
109:β (
682:)
656:)
637:)
619:)
598:)
567:)
551:)
448:)
437:.
419:Β·
416:ζη¨Ώ
412:Β·
371:)
355:)
347:--
299:)
288:.
273:)
262:.
247:)
236:.
221:)
210:do
187:my
156:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
678:(
652:(
633:(
623:.
615:(
594:(
563:(
547:(
459:|
444:(
440:β
391:)
387:(
367:(
351:(
295:(
291:β
269:(
265:β
243:(
239:β
217:(
180:)
172:Β·
166:Β·
158:Β·
151:Β·
145:Β·
139:Β·
133:Β·
128:(
120:(
117:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.