Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/TheLadders.com - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

395:- If representative of the company are editting the article contrary to our guidelines, then those representatives need to be corrected. The company itself has received coverage in mutliple reliable sources to establish notability. Any other issues are either editting actions, or potentially admin actions in the case of severe problems with any article neutrality. To take an extreme example, if PR flacks from Nike rewrote the 259:
Rxguy is arguing that the Knowledge (XXG) community is incapable of maintaining a neutral and reliably sourced article in the case of TheLadders.com. We ought to reject that argument. Uninvolved editors should place this article on their watch lists, and act to ensure that the article reflects the
226:
Anytime that criticism is added with reliable citations it is removed by TheLadders, a biased user attempting to keep any negatives about the company off of the page. It cannot be kept impartial when it is constantly managed by the company itself.
156: 117: 416:, weakly. This does appear to have gotten some independent notice concerning its business model, which involves having job seekers pay for their own listings. This is borderline 371: 345: 150: 326:
because the author/main contributor freely acknowledges in the Discussion page and their User pages that they are using Knowledge (XXG) as a p.r. tool.--
90: 85: 17: 94: 461:. NPOV, "reads like an advertisement", and vandalism/edit-wars are reasons to fix and possibly lock an article, not to delete it. 77: 171: 138: 297: 485: 36: 243: 205:
because the company is notable, as shown by extensive coverage in reliable sources. Correct shortcomings due to
132: 484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
331: 53: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
187:
Article reads like a non-neutral advertisement and is routinely edited by those associated with the company.
470: 449: 428: 408: 386: 360: 335: 318: 273: 247: 231: 218: 196: 128: 59: 445: 327: 305:, as non-neutrality cannot be the sole reason for deleting an article, unless, of course, it is composed 178: 285: 269: 214: 164: 81: 49: 302: 466: 301:
articles. These reliable sources sufficiently establish notability. Someone ought to check out
441: 382: 356: 314: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
417: 261: 425: 144: 437: 291: 206: 239: 192: 458: 404: 265: 210: 73: 65: 462: 378: 352: 310: 111: 421: 399:
article as a big advert, would you advocate deleting the Nike, Inc. article? --
396: 264:. Deletion of an article on a notable topic is most certainly not the answer. 235: 188: 400: 478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107: 103: 99: 163: 440:
with significant secondary source coverage, I think.
209:
content through normal editing rather than deletion.
177: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 488:). No further edits should be made to this page. 372:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 346:list of Business-related deletion discussions 8: 366: 340: 370:: This debate has been included in the 344:: This debate has been included in the 309:of spam, which in this case, it is not. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 426:killing the human spirit since 2003! 436:and cleanup. It does seem to pass 24: 1: 471:22:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC) 450:18:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 429:18:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC) 409:17:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC) 387:01:59, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 361:01:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 336:19:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 319:07:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 274:06:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 248:05:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 219:05:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 197:03:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 505: 60:05:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 481:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 262:neutral point of view 207:conflict of interest 292:The New York Times 44:The result was 420:in its field. - 389: 375: 363: 349: 251: 234:comment added by 496: 483: 376: 350: 250: 228: 182: 181: 167: 115: 97: 56: 34: 504: 503: 499: 498: 497: 495: 494: 493: 492: 486:deletion review 479: 422:Smerdis of Tlön 229: 124: 88: 72: 69: 58: 54: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 502: 500: 491: 490: 474: 473: 452: 431: 411: 390: 364: 338: 328:Knevaslstue120 321: 277: 276: 253: 252: 221: 185: 184: 121: 74:TheLadders.com 68: 66:TheLadders.com 63: 52: 50:The Bushranger 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 501: 489: 487: 482: 476: 475: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 453: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 432: 430: 427: 423: 419: 415: 412: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 391: 388: 384: 380: 373: 369: 365: 362: 358: 354: 347: 343: 339: 337: 333: 329: 325: 322: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 299: 294: 293: 288: 287: 282: 279: 278: 275: 271: 267: 263: 258: 255: 254: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 225: 222: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 200: 199: 198: 194: 190: 180: 176: 173: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 130: 127: 126:Find sources: 122: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 55:One ping only 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 480: 477: 454: 442:Jay-Sebastos 433: 418:significance 413: 392: 367: 341: 323: 306: 296: 290: 284: 280: 256: 230:— Preceding 223: 202: 186: 174: 168: 160: 153: 147: 141: 135: 125: 45: 43: 31: 28: 151:free images 397:Nike, Inc. 459:Cullen328 379:• Gene93k 353:• Gene93k 303:WP:BEFORE 266:Cullen328 211:Cullen328 463:Sangrolu 307:entirely 244:contribs 232:unsigned 118:View log 311:Goodvac 257:Comment 157:WP refs 145:scholar 91:protect 86:history 438:WP:ORG 324:Remove 295:, and 224:Remove 129:Google 95:delete 236:Rxguy 189:Rxguy 172:JSTOR 133:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 467:talk 457:per 455:Keep 446:talk 434:Keep 414:Keep 405:talk 401:Whpq 393:Keep 383:talk 368:Note 357:talk 342:Note 332:talk 315:talk 286:Time 283:per 281:Keep 270:talk 240:talk 215:talk 203:Keep 193:talk 165:FENS 139:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 46:keep 377:-- 351:-- 298:CNN 179:TWL 116:– ( 469:) 448:) 424:- 407:) 385:) 374:. 359:) 348:. 334:) 317:) 289:, 272:) 246:) 242:• 217:) 195:) 159:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 48:. 465:( 444:( 403:( 381:( 355:( 330:( 313:( 268:( 238:( 213:( 191:( 183:) 175:· 169:· 161:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 136:· 131:( 123:( 120:) 114:) 76:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
The Bushranger
One ping only
05:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
TheLadders.com
TheLadders.com
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Rxguy
talk
03:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
conflict of interest

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.