226:. Well... just because it isn't listed in the filmography section doesn't mean that she didn't star in it. It's mentioned further up in her article, but generally (assuming that she did act in it) all that the lack of a mention in the filmography means is that someone forgot to add it. That aside, if Bingbing received a best supporting award for her role in the film then that could show notability for the film. I'm not familiar with the Golden Horse Film Awards, but it appears to be a rather big deal for Taiwan. Even if this isn't supposed to be a big enough award to give notability for a keep, it does mean that there could be more sources. I managed to find a source to back up the award, so I'll add it to the article.
443:
429:. There's a ton of stuff in Chinese about the film and there seems to have been a bit of a kerfuffle concerning the film. Supposedly at one point there was something about the promotion and it not featuring Fan Bingbing or certain marketing material being pulled. The translation is pretty wonky, but the general gist is that it was a pretty big thing for the film, the equivalent of
240:
One source isn't enough and the reviews do not count. So notability still isn't met, in my opinion. Besides, even if Bing Bing did get the award, that would still be rather minor. I don't know, but I would say the Golden Horse Film Awards are somewhat like the
Academy Awards in Taiwan, but it doesn't
309:
Well, if this article survives afd, the grammar and stuff needs to be corrected. The info too. Also, I found an imdb page on this. But apart from that, and a few other run of the mill reviews and untrustable wikias and blogspot pages, I could find nothing to increase the sourcability of the article.
279:
Yup, reviews DO count... and represent the expected commentary and analysis in secondary sources. We actually care less for the helpfulness of wide release, and more for coverage in decent secondary sources, as lacking coverage, release means little... and sometimes even a film with only a limited
324:
Isues best addressed through regular editing.... not deletion. And had you looked at the sources for reviews linked through IMDB (in discounting It as a source, it still leads to much that aids us), you will see this thing had wide enough
611:
674:
173:
265:
Reviews don't count? I've always been under the impression that as long as you have reviews from multiple independent and reliable sources, they count towards notability if the film received a wide release.
387:
Substantial coverage in
Variety and DreadCentral, both of which are usually considered reliable sources for film articles, as well as other references which provide further information. There's a bit here
605:
668:
167:
128:
484:
506:
551:, and that the topic being notable and sourcable in Chinese-language as well as in English-language through reviews, analysis, and commentary in multiple
626:
408:
593:
133:
331:
And no... I am not limiting my thoughts to just what few are listed, but to the wider picture of even more coverage than shared on the list.
404:
587:
373:
101:
96:
583:
105:
689:
17:
656:
88:
633:
188:
155:
407:
are Taiwan's major film awards; Taiwan doesn't have a film industry as big as the USA or India, but it's not negligible
315:
246:
213:
650:
599:
737:
568:
543:
tagged for sources if they were lacking (no longer the case), rather than bring an improvable article to AFD and
470:
340:
293:
40:
149:
64:
646:
417:
718:
571:
520:
498:
473:
456:
421:
377:
343:
319:
311:
296:
274:
250:
242:
235:
217:
209:
145:
70:
696:
733:
452:
369:
270:
231:
36:
561:
544:
463:
410:
361:
333:
286:
195:
446:
714:
682:
619:
397:
388:
357:.上帝啊，你竟敢说你的母语是中文？你知道范冰冰吗？你知道她主演的所有的电影？这部心中有鬼是她主演的电影！竟然还要被删除？你脑子进水了？OH,FOR GOD'S SAKE,FORGIVE YOU!
181:
60:
413:
92:
280:
release can have the coverage to be determined as notable. (and the film is NOW included in the
662:
204:
No citations. Besides, The
Matrimony is not one of the films in the filmography section of the
516:
494:
430:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
732:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
350:
well, you said that your native language is chinese,so,can you read this:百度百科？read this link:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
536:
448:
433:. If anyone who reads any of the Chinese languages can translate this, I'd be much obliged.
365:
266:
227:
161:
440:
710:
548:
532:
329:
53:
400:
281:
205:
84:
76:
57:
552:
512:
490:
393:
354:
326:
122:
556:
437:
434:
351:
549:
sources need not be IN an article for a topic's notability to exist
390:
726:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
403:. And there are likely to be Chinese-language sources as well.
547:. Awards aside, the nominator might now better understand that
118:
114:
110:
681:
618:
180:
392:(both professionally-edited sites that should meet
353:,then you will konw that this film is starred by
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
740:). No further edits should be made to this page.
695:
632:
194:
8:
505:Note: This debate has been included in the
483:Note: This debate has been included in the
328:and was covered by enough secondary sources.
504:
485:list of China-related deletion discussions
482:
507:list of Film-related deletion discussions
431:I Heart Huckabees#Tension during filming
284:filmography through regular editing.
405:Golden Horse Film Festival and Awards
7:
24:
396:) and another ref for the award
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
535:. Nom should have done his
757:
707:Snow Keep and Speedy Close
553:reliable secondary sources
719:16:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
572:19:32, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
521:13:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
499:13:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
474:03:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
461:Good job on the article!
457:11:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
422:09:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
378:07:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
344:03:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
320:07:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
297:03:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
275:07:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
251:07:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
236:06:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
218:06:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
71:22:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
729:Please do not modify it.
241:get that much coverage?
32:Please do not modify it.
709:per proven notability.
48:The result was
523:
510:
501:
488:
381:
364:comment added by
312:Bonkers The Clown
243:Bonkers The Clown
210:Bonkers The Clown
748:
731:
700:
699:
685:
637:
636:
622:
564:
555:is exactly what
511:
489:
466:
380:
358:
336:
289:
199:
198:
184:
136:
126:
108:
67:
34:
756:
755:
751:
750:
749:
747:
746:
745:
744:
738:deletion review
727:
642:
579:
562:
464:
359:
334:
287:
141:
132:
99:
83:
80:
69:
65:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
754:
752:
743:
742:
722:
721:
703:
702:
639:
575:
574:
559:is all about.
531:and close per
525:
524:
502:
479:
478:
477:
476:
424:
382:
348:
347:
346:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
277:
256:
255:
254:
253:
202:
201:
138:
79:
74:
63:
61:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
753:
741:
739:
735:
730:
724:
723:
720:
716:
712:
708:
705:
704:
698:
694:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
661:
658:
655:
652:
648:
645:
644:Find sources:
640:
635:
631:
628:
625:
621:
617:
613:
610:
607:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
589:
585:
582:
581:Find sources:
577:
576:
573:
570:
569:
566:
565:
558:
554:
550:
546:
545:force cleanup
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
508:
503:
500:
496:
492:
486:
481:
480:
475:
472:
471:
468:
467:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
447:
444:
441:
438:
435:
432:
428:
425:
423:
419:
415:
414:Colapeninsula
411:
409:
406:
402:
398:
395:
391:
389:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
356:
352:
349:
345:
342:
341:
338:
337:
330:
327:
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
308:
307:
298:
295:
294:
291:
290:
283:
282:Fan Bing Bing
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
252:
248:
244:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
206:Fan Bing Bing
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
130:
124:
120:
116:
112:
107:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:The Matrimony
82:
81:
78:
77:The Matrimony
75:
73:
72:
68:
66:One ping only
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
728:
725:
706:
692:
686:
678:
671:
665:
659:
653:
643:
629:
623:
615:
608:
602:
596:
590:
580:
567:
560:
540:
528:
469:
462:
426:
384:
360:— Preceding
355:Fan Bingbing
339:
332:
292:
285:
223:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
49:
47:
31:
28:
669:free images
606:free images
449:Tokyogirl79
366:Mmmvidyahoo
267:Tokyogirl79
228:Tokyogirl79
168:free images
557:notability
734:talk page
711:Cavarrone
539:and then
513:• Gene93k
491:• Gene93k
399:. Meets
208:article.
37:talk page
736:or in a
563:Schmidt,
537:research
465:Schmidt,
374:contribs
362:unsigned
335:Schmidt,
288:Schmidt,
129:View log
39:or in a
675:WP refs
663:scholar
612:WP refs
600:scholar
541:perhaps
533:WP:SNOW
427:Comment
325:release
224:Comment
174:WP refs
162:scholar
102:protect
97:history
54:WP:SNOW
647:Google
584:Google
401:WP:GNG
146:Google
106:delete
58:WP:HEY
52:. per
690:JSTOR
651:books
627:JSTOR
588:books
394:WP:RS
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
123:views
115:watch
111:links
16:<
715:talk
683:FENS
657:news
620:FENS
594:news
529:Keep
517:talk
495:talk
453:talk
418:talk
412:. --
385:Keep
370:talk
316:talk
271:talk
247:talk
232:talk
214:talk
182:FENS
156:news
119:logs
93:talk
89:edit
56:and
50:keep
697:TWL
634:TWL
196:TWL
131:•
127:– (
717:)
677:)
614:)
519:)
509:.
497:)
487:.
455:)
445:,
442:,
439:,
436:,
420:)
376:)
372:•
318:)
273:)
249:)
234:)
216:)
176:)
121:|
117:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
713:(
701:)
693:·
687:·
679:·
672:·
666:·
660:·
654:·
649:(
641:(
638:)
630:·
624:·
616:·
609:·
603:·
597:·
591:·
586:(
578:(
515:(
493:(
451:(
416:(
368:(
314:(
269:(
245:(
230:(
212:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
125:)
87:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.