466:
news stories which makes it highly unlikely another news source would have need to quote or reference TNZW. Further TNZW is unique nature - it is the only, and therefore first, news review site in
Australasia. This combined with the small size of the New Zealand market does mean, I would argue, that
310:
You are a real friendly group aren't you. Ok, let's try again. We are a new news site and why would competitor sites be interested in promoting a new minor site, therefore whay would the Herald, stuff.co.nz, TVNZ andTV3 give us any attention, nice if they would. And no this isn't in the 2009 Quantas
51:
I was considering userfying this, as a couple of editors suggested, but as the account to which this would be userfied appears to have a
Conflict of Interest, I believe that deletion without userfying would be the most prudent course of action. However, should the site meet the notability criteria
351:
182:
248:
Not sure how this works. Can you guide me. I began loading this entry for The New
Zealand week and when I returned to edit further there is this mark for deletion. This a genuine news site and a genuine wiki entry.
475:
While it may meet your personal notability criteria, notability on
Knowledge (XXG) is established by the fact that other people write about a subject if it is notable. And not just anyone -
346:
Being a competitor to mainstream news organisations could make notability a little harder on one hand, but then if for example the NZ Herald publishes a story from the site then perhaps
137:
230:
176:
365:
for example. I suggested Userfy because the site is fairly new, maybe it meets a notability criteria in the future, and the article could easily be recreated.
311:
awards. (a) because the site didn't exist before the last round and (b) because we're not spending the thousands of dollars it costs to enter the awards.
142:
110:
105:
114:
213:
Unsourced and promotional article about a non-notable website. Alexa rank is 2.7 million. Prod was removed without any concerns being addressed.
97:
458:
I think we need to clarify nature of site, which may serve to answer some of the questions raised. The New
Zealand Week (TNZW) is a news
289:. See no results for this website from the NZ Herald, stuff.co.nz, TVNZ, TV3. Don't see the site at the Qantas Media Awards 2009 results
72:
17:
417:
327:
265:
479:- which the blog you have linked to is not. The site might become notable in the future, but that will take time to establish. Oh,
197:
164:
507:
36:
158:
492:
448:
421:
392:
374:
331:
301:
269:
241:
219:
78:
154:
506:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
101:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
467:
it meets the notability criteria. Here are a couple of other smaller news sites that have referred to TNZW:
204:
405:
350:#3 is met. I did check the competitor issue, the Dominion Post has over 1000 hits at the New Zealand Herald
315:
253:
93:
85:
66:
413:
323:
261:
409:
319:
257:
190:
170:
488:
444:
370:
297:
236:
214:
55:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
436:
347:
286:
52:
for inclusion in the future, there is no reason why it cannot be created at that time. --
476:
354:
282:
484:
440:
366:
293:
290:
131:
358:
500:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
362:
127:
123:
119:
189:
203:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
510:). No further edits should be made to this page.
231:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions
8:
388:as above. Single issue user, possible COI.
225:
229:: This debate has been included in the
462:site. This being the case it doesn't
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
357:aren't limited to mainstream news,
353:, though it is large and not new.
24:
1:
493:07:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
449:03:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
422:01:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
393:10:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
375:03:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
332:01:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
302:22:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
270:21:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
242:21:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
220:21:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
79:00:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
527:
401:As above. What's a COI?
503:Please do not modify it.
439:, conflict of interest.
32:Please do not modify it.
94:The New Zealand Week
86:The New Zealand Week
44:The result was
425:
408:comment added by
335:
318:comment added by
273:
256:comment added by
234:
518:
505:
477:Reliable sources
469:
468:
424:
402:
391:
355:Reliable sources
334:
312:
281:for not meeting
272:
250:
239:
217:
208:
207:
193:
145:
135:
117:
75:
69:
61:
58:
34:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
514:
508:deletion review
501:
403:
390:DerbyCountyinNZ
389:
386:Delete / userfy
313:
279:Delete / userfy
251:
237:
215:
150:
141:
108:
92:
89:
73:
67:
59:
56:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
524:
522:
513:
512:
497:
496:
495:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
429:
428:
427:
426:
396:
395:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
339:
338:
337:
336:
305:
304:
275:
274:
245:
244:
211:
210:
147:
143:AfD statistics
88:
83:
82:
81:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
523:
511:
509:
504:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
465:
461:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
400:
399:
398:
397:
394:
387:
384:
383:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
247:
246:
243:
240:
232:
228:
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
153:
152:Find sources:
148:
144:
139:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
87:
84:
80:
76:
70:
64:
63:
62:
50:
49:
48:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
502:
499:
480:
463:
459:
457:
385:
278:
226:
212:
200:
194:
186:
179:
173:
167:
161:
151:
54:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
410:Larryboy123
404:—Preceding
320:Larryboy123
314:—Preceding
258:Larryboy123
252:—Preceding
177:free images
485:dramatic
464:generate
418:contribs
406:unsigned
328:contribs
316:unsigned
266:contribs
254:unsigned
138:View log
74:contribs
441:XLerate
367:XLerate
294:XLerate
238:gadfium
216:gadfium
183:WP refs
171:scholar
111:protect
106:history
57:Phantom
481:Delete
460:review
437:WP:COI
359:Te Ara
348:WP:WEB
287:WP:WEB
155:Google
115:delete
46:Delete
198:JSTOR
159:books
132:views
124:watch
120:links
60:Steve
16:<
489:talk
445:talk
414:talk
371:talk
363:DNZB
324:talk
298:talk
283:WP:N
262:talk
227:Note
191:FENS
165:news
128:logs
102:talk
98:edit
68:talk
205:TWL
140:•
136:– (
491:)
483:.
447:)
420:)
416:•
373:)
361:,
330:)
326:•
300:)
292:.
285:/
268:)
264:•
233:.
185:)
130:|
126:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
77:\
487:(
443:(
412:(
369:(
322:(
296:(
260:(
235:-
209:)
201:·
195:·
187:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
157:(
149:(
146:)
134:)
96:(
71:|
65:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.