538:: The content is an essay. "Satirical news sources have become a staple in today’s media." Actually, this is not a new development, satirical news goes way back, at least into the early 1800s (and perhaps longer but that's outside my knowledge area). And "There is an ongoing debate as whether or not satirical newspapers should be brought on as dailies. Satirical newspapers should not be published as dailies." Yes, they should be published twice-daily.--
268:. Why not give a non procedural response instead of being pedantic? Part of the educational project should be teaching students (and their professors who created this assignment, and their ambassadors) what appropriate articles for wikipedia are. These articles are great school papers. School papers do not belong on wikipedia.
568:
and because thee article's talk page says "This article is the subject of an educational assignment at
University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) and the Knowledge (XXG) Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term." This doesn't belong in the main space, but it also doesn't belong
364:- Pretty clearly an essay, pretty clearly a serious contribution. I'd hope the closing administrator will constrain the outcomes here to KEEP, MERGE, or USERFY, in the name of DO NOT BITE THE NEWCOMERS. No opinion how to play this myself at the moment, I'll return to it when I get a chance.
420:
Interesting, well-written piece that I'm sorry to say does not belong as a
Knowledge (XXG) article as it is synthesis and original research. Parts of this could certainly be merged into the regular Onion article, which could probably do with a section on its impact on society.
398:
I commented on your talk as well, but I think what you wrote is great. I think you should submit that as a new rough draft template for twinkle or something for articles that get AFDed, as it gives way more information and easy letdown than what currently happens.
158:
92:
87:
96:
79:
326:(and possibly merge at some later date) I agree with Colonel Warden here, a link is not a deletion rationale. essay-ish articles and OR can be fixed through editing, only in severe cases should an article be deleted for this, per
152:
119:
200:
307:
per OR and NOTESSAY. That it may serve a function for the author is meaningless, and in spite of it's many fine qualities as an essay, it isn't appropriate content for
Knowledge (XXG).
491:
589:
173:
473:
concerns abound with this entry, it reads as a personal observation of the media and satirical news sourced. An interesting read, but more suited for the OpEds or a blog.
601:
578:
556:
527:
505:
482:
455:
430:
408:
393:
373:
339:
316:
295:
277:
253:
234:
140:
61:
286:
On the other hand, the adaptation of term papers into encyclopedia articles is something very desirable, if they're well researched, wikified, and written to form.
134:
130:
83:
180:
75:
67:
146:
344:
331:
352:
516:
because this is an academic assignment which is inappropriate for the mainspace (in particular, its last paragraph blatantly violates
517:
17:
547:
05:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC). Change !vote to userify. Oh vey re the class project, a huge disconnect is going on there.--
520:
by editorializing). Userfying would allow the article creator to try to bring the page up to
Knowledge (XXG) standards. --
469:, and if so, it'd be a good idea to fix that up now to keep the procedural wiki-lawyering to a minimum. "Not Essay" and
620:
40:
524:
381:
230:
348:
335:
597:
574:
244:- this article is part of an educational project. The author is a new Wikipedian and a university student.
312:
384:
to the new content contributor giving them my take on the situation, hopefully getting them up to speed.
218:
616:
36:
466:
261:
189:
249:
57:
565:
521:
226:
166:
593:
570:
404:
273:
196:
222:
501:
451:
426:
389:
369:
308:
291:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
615:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
327:
245:
53:
470:
265:
210:
478:
549:
540:
400:
269:
192:
497:
447:
422:
385:
365:
287:
113:
474:
442:
609:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
215:
The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion...
592:
since it's the third article from this class to come to AfD.
76:
The Onion and
Satirical Newspapers in today's Media Industry
68:
The Onion and
Satirical Newspapers in today's Media Industry
109:
105:
101:
165:
179:
330:. I think that there is salvageable content here.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
623:). No further edits should be made to this page.
492:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
8:
588:: This has been brought to the attention of
490:Note: This debate has been included in the
225:is just an index of Knowledge (XXG) essays.
465:- I presume the nominator meant to link to
489:
518:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
260:Quite correct, the correct link is
24:
66:
1:
602:11:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
579:10:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
557:13:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
528:04:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
506:01:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
483:20:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
456:18:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
431:17:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
409:17:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
394:17:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
374:16:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
340:16:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
317:16:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
296:18:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
278:16:06, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
254:16:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
235:15:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
201:15:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
62:20:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
640:
612:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
382:a longish communication
52:per discussion at ANI.
380:Note: I have written
353:few or no other edits
355:outside this topic.
555:
546:
508:
495:
471:original research
356:
631:
614:
554:
545:
496:
342:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
48:The result was
34:
639:
638:
634:
633:
632:
630:
629:
628:
627:
621:deletion review
610:
440:- as a fork of
126:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
637:
635:
626:
625:
605:
604:
582:
581:
566:Metropolitan90
559:
530:
522:Metropolitan90
510:
509:
486:
485:
459:
458:
434:
433:
414:
413:
412:
411:
377:
376:
358:
357:
345:137.43.188.153
332:137.43.188.153
320:
319:
301:
300:
299:
298:
281:
280:
257:
256:
238:
237:
221:and note that
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
636:
624:
622:
618:
613:
607:
606:
603:
599:
595:
594:PaintedCarpet
591:
587:
584:
583:
580:
576:
572:
571:PaintedCarpet
567:
563:
560:
558:
552:
551:
543:
542:
537:
535:
531:
529:
526:
523:
519:
515:
512:
511:
507:
503:
499:
493:
488:
487:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
460:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
439:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
419:
416:
415:
410:
406:
402:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
359:
354:
350:
346:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:". See also
216:
212:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
191:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
611:
608:
585:
561:
548:
539:
533:
532:
513:
462:
441:
437:
417:
361:
323:
309:Dennis Brown
304:
241:
219:WP:VAGUEWAVE
214:
206:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
49:
47:
31:
28:
467:WP:NOTESSAY
351:) has made
262:WP:NOTESSAY
207:Speedy Keep
190:WP:NOTESSAY
153:free images
246:Nikkimaria
54:Nikkimaria
617:talk page
498:• Gene93k
443:The Onion
37:talk page
619:or in a
569:at AfD.
550:Milowent
541:Milowent
401:Gaijin42
270:Gaijin42
223:WP:ESSAY
193:Gaijin42
120:View log
50:Userfied
39:or in a
536:Userify
448:Carrite
423:Nwlaw63
386:Carrite
366:Carrite
362:Comment
288:Carrite
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
562:Userfy
534:Delete
525:(talk)
514:Userfy
463:Delete
418:Delete
328:WP:ATD
305:Delete
264:, and
227:Warden
131:Google
97:delete
438:Merge
266:WP:OR
211:WP:SK
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
598:talk
586:Note
575:talk
564:per
502:talk
479:talk
475:Tarc
452:talk
427:talk
405:talk
390:talk
370:talk
349:talk
336:talk
324:Keep
313:talk
292:talk
274:talk
250:talk
242:Note
231:talk
209:per
197:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
590:ANI
181:TWL
118:– (
600:)
577:)
553:•
544:•
504:)
494:.
481:)
454:)
429:)
407:)
392:)
372:)
343:—
338:)
315:)
294:)
276:)
252:)
233:)
199:)
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
596:(
573:(
500:(
477:(
450:(
445:.
425:(
403:(
388:(
368:(
347:(
334:(
311:(
290:(
272:(
248:(
229:(
213:"
195:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.