283:
Yes but all three of the musicians with articles have, including their associated acts, separate acts as well which have their own articles. To me, this means they would probably pass an afd on their independent notabilities. Assuming that at least Coles and Baksh would pass, then I cannot honestly
349:
I am really beginning to dislike that criterion. A band is notable simply because two of its members are notable simply because another band is notable? The notability of this band seems to depend solely on the individual notability of a completely different band. The music notability guideline will
266:
That criterion is referring to independently notable musicians. Just because a musician has his own article, it does not necessarily mean he is notable. From the looks of the musicians with their own articles, both (other than Baksh) don't look notable.
413:
entitled to be at least a redirect to their band. But if they've been in two different notable bands, then how do you decide which of their bands gets priority over the other one as the redirect target? The answer is that without violating
147:
The band has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. In addition, they've only been active since last year and have released one self-released EP, having not been signed by any record label. The band fails
418:
and other
Knowledge proscriptions against arbitrariness, you don't — so until it becomes possible to redirect one title to two different articles at once, making that a criterion for a separate article is the
174:
140:
219:
371:
387:
That looks like an interesting discussion, and I may be able to learn something from it. I'll get to reading it more thoroughly after the holiday.
305:
107:
102:
111:
70:
94:
498:
17:
149:
494:
56:
notable musicians (emphasis added)." I take that to mean that the members' notability cannot depend on another band.
405:
I'm not terribly fond of it either, but the problem is that regardless of whether they're notable enough for their
206:
571:
36:
570:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
556:
538:
suggestion that bands with multiple notable members is likely notable itself is quite wise but not infallible.
522:
502:
478:
432:
398:
382:
365:
344:
319:
299:
278:
261:
233:
209:
189:
163:
76:
65:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
185:
98:
470:
202:
458:
374:, consensus was not reached to remove the criterion, although the required standard was tightened up.
325:
551:
295:
257:
453:
60:
57:
333:
518:
428:
181:
90:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
288:
is failed. However, since only one of the criteria is passed the keep is indeed a week one.
393:
360:
314:
273:
158:
539:
290:
285:
252:
243:
199:
535:
415:
375:
337:
247:
226:
49:
329:
514:
424:
128:
531:
388:
355:
309:
268:
153:
350:
say what it says, but I really think there should be reliable sources covering
488:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
370:
The last time a suggestion was made to deprecate criterion #6, in
564:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
308:
which only turns up one result that briefly mentions Coles.
175:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
534:, as it seems to be his side project. I think that the
304:
Just as a note, it looks like Coles isn't notable. See
135:
124:
120:
116:
246:
because of multiple members with their own article. (
493:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \
52:#6 states: "an ensemble which contains two or more
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
574:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:Coles is a member of two notable bands, though:
8:
423:solution that survives the neutrality test.
220:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
214:
169:
354:in detail before it deserves an article.
218:: This debate has been included in the
173:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
372:this discussion a few months ago
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
150:the music notability guideline
1:
513:for reasons already listed.
332:. That's usually enough for
454:notability is not inherited
591:
433:12:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
279:15:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
262:08:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
234:04:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
210:20:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
190:18:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
164:17:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
77:18:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
567:Please do not modify it.
557:18:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
523:18:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
503:14:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
479:18:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
399:02:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
383:14:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
366:15:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
345:04:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
320:03:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
300:05:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
409:article, a musician is
495:Backslash Forwardslash
306:the Google News search
528:Merge and redirect
44:The result was
555:
505:
474:
468:
381:
343:
242:. Does not fail
236:
232:
223:
192:
178:
91:The Organ Thieves
83:The Organ Thieves
582:
569:
549:
547:
544:
492:
490:
477:
475:
472:
467:
464:
462:
396:
391:
380:
378:
363:
358:
342:
340:
317:
312:
276:
271:
231:
229:
224:
179:
161:
156:
138:
132:
114:
73:
68:
63:
34:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
578:
572:deletion review
565:
545:
540:
486:
471:
465:
460:
457:
394:
389:
376:
361:
356:
338:
315:
310:
274:
269:
227:
159:
154:
134:
105:
89:
86:
71:
66:
61:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
577:
576:
560:
559:
525:
507:
506:
491:
483:
482:
481:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
403:
402:
401:
237:
212:
193:
145:
144:
85:
80:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
575:
573:
568:
562:
561:
558:
553:
548:
543:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
520:
516:
512:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
489:
485:
484:
480:
476:
469:
463:
455:
451:
448:
434:
430:
426:
422:
417:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
392:
386:
385:
384:
379:
373:
369:
368:
367:
364:
359:
353:
348:
347:
346:
341:
335:
331:
330:Brown Brigade
327:
323:
322:
321:
318:
313:
307:
303:
302:
301:
298:
297:
293:
292:
287:
282:
281:
280:
277:
272:
265:
264:
263:
260:
259:
255:
254:
249:
245:
241:
238:
235:
230:
221:
217:
213:
211:
208:
204:
203:The Uninvited
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
176:
172:
168:
167:
166:
165:
162:
157:
151:
142:
137:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
84:
81:
79:
78:
74:
69:
64:
59:
55:
54:independently
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
566:
563:
541:
527:
510:
487:
459:
449:
420:
410:
406:
351:
294:
289:
256:
251:
239:
215:
195:
182:TexasAndroid
170:
146:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
532:Chuck Coles
334:WP:MUSICBIO
377:Paul Erik
352:this band
339:Paul Erik
326:Cauterize
284:say that
240:Weak keep
228:Paul Erik
286:WP:MUSIC
244:WP:MUSIC
200:WP:MUSIC
141:View log
536:WP:BAND
515:magnius
425:Bearcat
416:WP:NPOV
296:Milenko
258:Milenko
248:WP:BAND
108:protect
103:history
58:King of
50:WP:BAND
542:Double
511:Delete
466:anniba
450:Delete
411:always
250:#6).
196:Delete
136:delete
112:delete
46:delete
205:Co.,
139:) – (
129:views
121:watch
117:links
16:<
552:talk
546:Blue
519:talk
499:talk
473:loki
429:talk
421:only
328:and
216:Note
207:Inc.
198:per
186:talk
171:Note
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
530:to
497:/ {
456:.--
407:own
395:meh
390:Tim
362:meh
357:Tim
316:meh
311:Tim
291:Zab
275:meh
270:Tim
253:Zab
180:--
160:meh
155:Tim
521:)
501:}
452:,
431:)
336:.
222:.
188:)
177:.
152:.
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
75:♠
48:.
554:)
550:(
517:(
461:C
427:(
225:—
184:(
143:)
133:(
131:)
93:(
72:♣
67:♦
62:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.