Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/The Apology of Scanderbeg - Knowledge

Source 📝

265: 268:
generally recognized English translation than given here. Finally, the title here is something of an issue, and makes me nervous about a redirect; there are exactly two sources that refer to this work as the "Apology of Scanderbeg" (or Skanderbeg): one is the source that this is largely copied from,
381:
if we can avoid it (although I would suggest, since it is a translation and not a commonly used English name, that we rename to use the Skanderbeg spelling used elsewhere on en.wiki for the hero). I have tried to clean up the language and removed the over-the-top praise given the author, and there
200:
This article is almost incomprehensible, due to a combination of poor English, non-neutral viewpoint, and lack of organization. The only reference is to a work in a foreign language that (contrary to the statement of this article) is not Latin. If this is meant to be an article about the work, it
458:, as mentioned also in the article. The article must be called one or the other. It would be easier to find if it were merged in the article for the author. According to WP:N, meeting the notability standard does not guarantee an article if there are other considerations. 440:
It would be worth an article, except that there is a real problem with the title that would make it preferable to merge. TThe current one is is a made-up title for the book. It appears there is no convenient title in any modern language. The Latin title cited above
448: 169: 378: 382:
is more work to be done - there is a quote that is poorly translated. However, I think it likely meets the bar for notability, so we should look at improving rather than deleting it.
163: 223:
the article needs to be dramatically improved, and it appears that Albanian editors are currently doing so. I suspect that sources do exist, though they are not present.
400: 122: 331: 295: 248:(where it is already mentioned). There are a lot of problems here, not the least of which is that most of the text is a (probably machine-translated) copyvio of 95: 90: 370:
I am pretty sure it is notable, as I have found a journal article that specifically addresses this work (written in Albanian, but the abstract is in English).
99: 82: 129: 377:
but if this is a translation of the commonly used (in ALbania) abbreviated title, I don't have a problem with it - we certainly don't want to call it
252:. That notwithstanding, there has clearly been at least one full cycle of translation for some of this material, and as a result it gets a lot simply 52:. In my view, the "merge" opinions are better argued, but there's no consensus for a merger here. This discussion can continue on the talk page. 260:(also styled as the Latinized Tomeus Marnavitius, but never as anything similar to "Margnavici"), for example. And the actual title of the work— 456:
George Castrioti of Epirus, commonly called Scanderbeg, the very mighty and invincible prince of Epirus restored to his people and his country
184: 151: 373:
It refers to this as notable as the first polemic written by an Albanian about an Albanian subject. I don't think it is well known
353: 317: 17: 443:
Georgius Castriottus Epirensis vulgo Scanderbegh, Epirotarum Princeps fortissimus ac invictissimus suis et Patriae restitutus
379:
Georgius Castriottus Epirensis vulgo Scanderbegh, Epirotarum Princeps fortissimus ac invictissimus suis et Patriae restitutus
262:
Georgius Castriottus Epirensis vulgo Scanderbegh, Epirotatum Princeps fortissimus ac invictissimus suis et Patriae restitutus
86: 145: 485: 469: 432: 412: 391: 359: 323: 286: 282: 232: 214: 64: 408: 141: 504: 210: 191: 78: 70: 40: 278: 428: 479: 404: 228: 500: 348: 312: 205:
who have stated that the work is notable. As it is, this does not establish notability as to whatever.
36: 257: 157: 445:
is the title of the book, . We could give a literal translation--there's a source for one in Elsie's
206: 387: 177: 424: 249: 224: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
499:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
270: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
336: 300: 371: 383: 55: 482: 465: 245: 202: 116: 478:- The article in the refs by Lulëzim Lajçi, and the numerous google books results 460: 274: 493:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
112: 108: 104: 176: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 507:). No further edits should be made to this page. 450:], found also in the same word in that writer's 401:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 452:A biographical dictionary of Albanian History 447:Historical Dictionary of Albania as published 190: 8: 399:Note: This debate has been included in the 332:list of History-related deletion discussions 330:Note: This debate has been included in the 296:list of Albania-related deletion discussions 294:Note: This debate has been included in the 481:suggest to me that the subject is notable. 398: 329: 293: 269:and the other is a trivial mention on 7: 271:the website of the municipal library 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 201:should cite both the work and 1: 423:-- It feels notable to me. 524: 79:The Apology of Scanderbeg 71:The Apology of Scanderbeg 496:Please do not modify it. 486:18:11, 31 May 2017 (UTC) 470:01:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC) 433:18:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC) 413:13:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC) 392:02:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC) 360:20:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 324:20:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 287:19:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 256:. "Tomko Margnavici" is 233:19:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 215:17:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC) 65:07:47, 3 June 2017 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 279:Squeamish Ossifrage 258:Ivan Tomko Mrnavić 415: 405:Shawn in Montreal 362: 326: 63: 515: 498: 356: 351: 343: 339: 320: 315: 307: 303: 266:rather different 203:reliable sources 195: 194: 180: 132: 120: 102: 62: 60: 53: 34: 523: 522: 518: 517: 516: 514: 513: 512: 511: 505:deletion review 494: 454:-- it would be 358: 354: 349: 341: 337: 322: 318: 313: 305: 301: 240:or potentially 207:Robert McClenon 137: 128: 93: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 521: 519: 510: 509: 489: 488: 473: 435: 417: 416: 395: 394: 364: 363: 347: 327: 311: 290: 289: 235: 198: 197: 134: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 520: 508: 506: 502: 497: 491: 490: 487: 484: 480: 477: 474: 472: 471: 467: 463: 462: 455: 451: 449: 444: 439: 436: 434: 430: 426: 425:Peterkingiron 422: 419: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 397: 396: 393: 389: 385: 380: 376: 372: 369: 366: 365: 361: 357: 352: 346: 345: 344: 333: 328: 325: 321: 316: 310: 309: 308: 297: 292: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 234: 230: 226: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 193: 189: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139:Find sources: 135: 131: 127: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 495: 492: 475: 459: 457: 453: 446: 442: 437: 420: 374: 367: 340: 335: 304: 299: 261: 253: 246:Frang Bardhi 241: 237: 225:Power~enwiki 220: 199: 187: 181: 173: 166: 160: 154: 148: 138: 125: 57: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 250:this source 238:Weak delete 164:free images 375:in English 58:Sandstein 501:talk page 384:Agricolae 342:Quidditch 306:Quidditch 37:talk page 503:or in a 483:Smmurphy 242:redirect 123:View log 39:or in a 264:—has a 170:WP refs 158:scholar 96:protect 91:history 142:Google 100:delete 466:talk 438:Merge 275:Lezhë 254:wrong 185:JSTOR 146:books 130:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 476:Keep 429:talk 421:Keep 409:talk 388:talk 368:Keep 283:talk 229:talk 221:Keep 211:talk 178:FENS 152:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 461:DGG 273:in 244:to 192:TWL 121:– ( 468:) 431:) 411:) 403:. 390:) 338:WC 334:. 302:WC 298:. 285:) 277:. 231:) 213:) 172:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 464:( 427:( 407:( 386:( 355:✎ 350:☎ 319:✎ 314:☎ 281:( 227:( 209:( 196:) 188:· 182:· 174:· 167:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 144:( 136:( 133:) 126:· 119:) 81:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
 Sandstein 
07:47, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
The Apology of Scanderbeg
The Apology of Scanderbeg
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
reliable sources
Robert McClenon
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.