Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/The Bunny Museum - Knowledge

Source 📝

281:
is certainly cause for concern, it is not an automatic criteria for deletion. While Candace Frazee may have been a major contributor to the article, I see several other people have contributed in major ways to it who have no discernible connection to the museum. I'm also finding plenty of third party
394:
Not if the promotion is only a small portion of the article that would not merit a significant rewrite, and other editors have actively edited the article. The instance you cited was one sentence that could be and was easily reverted. If it was truly promotional in nature, it could be speedied. This
420:
I up and removed the useless and irrelivent About the Owners section, which drastically improved the quality of the article. Being that this museum is recognized as a Guniess record holder, it meets notability requirements, and now without that "fluff" section on the onwers, I see no major problems
297:. And that's just three pages into the more reliable of the Ghits. I see no reason to delete. If you feel it is promotional, improve it to make it less so. I personally don't see anything inherently promotional about the article. 164: 480:: As article writer I feel this is sourced and would like to make it very clear I have no connection with this subject matter other then adding the article. It passes general notability guidelines. 444:
I added a number of references to the article and helped re-write it. It seems to me that the subject is perfectly notable and has coverage spanning the ten+ years that the museum had been active.
667: 463:
COI is not a fatal poison to the existence of an article, so that is not a strong reason for deletion. User page is irrelevant to AfD discussion. Leaving, alas, no solid rationale for deletion.
119: 158: 641: 285: 497:: Doesn't hit any of the criteria for deletion. In particular, while the article may have been created for advertising, it does include relevant and useful content. 345:
Well, then, revert her if she continues and report her to AIV if she continues after being warned. AfD is not the venue to be fighting this battle.
124: 627: 92: 87: 96: 79: 179: 17: 316: 728: 146: 289: 287: 230:- I think the bunny article is nice and cited and was created by my friend. I like the pics also and the content detail. 594:: Hahaha!!! Now that's quirky. I definitely want to go there, shame I don't live in California. (By the way that's a 550: 293: 485: 283: 140: 748: 36: 747:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
733: 704: 682: 656: 631: 612: 584: 554: 522: 505: 489: 472: 455: 436: 404: 389: 354: 340: 306: 266: 239: 220: 61: 136: 578: 429: 383: 334: 259: 214: 513:: Seems notable enough, and seems very well cited. I do not see any good arguments for deletion offered. -- 450: 620:
the COI concerns over content are dealt with, and beyond that it looks fine and easily notable enough.--
481: 186: 83: 606: 538: 235: 622: 400: 364: 350: 302: 195:
The article is being treated as a means of self-promotion despite having been warned about being a
172: 57: 291: 726: 564: 423: 369: 320: 253: 200: 395:
could not be. As I said, you're pursing entirely the wrong venue to take care of this problem.
678: 652: 518: 468: 445: 152: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
700: 75: 67: 599: 546: 502: 231: 531: 396: 346: 298: 53: 49: 721: 717: 692: 360: 295: 278: 196: 247:
Despite the wording of this person's comment, his edit history indicates that he is
713: 674: 648: 514: 464: 113: 696: 251:
I would advise him to avoid the appearance of being a canvassed voter however.
542: 498: 741:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
691:- COI isn't a reason for deletion, this article clearly passes 668:
list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions
109: 105: 101: 171: 52:and agreement of nominator below. Non-admin close. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 751:). No further edits should be made to this page. 642:list of California-related deletion discussions 367:is clearly listed as causation for deletion. 185: 8: 720:. COI is not a valid argument for deletion. 662: 636: 666:: This debate has been included in the 640:: This debate has been included in the 7: 530:: Can we close this discussion per 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 734:16:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 705:16:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 683:16:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 657:16:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 632:13:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 613:13:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 585:12:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 555:11:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 523:11:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 506:09:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 490:04:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 473:00:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 456:00:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 437:23:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 405:23:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 390:23:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 355:23:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 341:23:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 307:23:09, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 267:23:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 240:22:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 221:22:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 62:16:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 768: 199:. User page is also promo 744:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 282:coverage, including 421:with the article. 685: 671: 659: 645: 625: 558: 541:comment added by 269: 759: 746: 724: 714:reliable sources 672: 646: 621: 603: 575: 557: 535: 482:Hell In A Bucket 453: 448: 435: 426: 380: 331: 265: 256: 246: 211: 190: 189: 175: 127: 117: 99: 76:The Bunny Museum 68:The Bunny Museum 34: 767: 766: 762: 761: 760: 758: 757: 756: 755: 749:deletion review 742: 731: 722: 712:as article has 630: 601: 565: 536: 451: 446: 434: 424: 422: 370: 321: 264: 254: 252: 201: 132: 123: 90: 74: 71: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 765: 763: 754: 753: 737: 736: 729: 707: 686: 660: 634: 626: 623:JohnBlackburne 615: 588: 587: 560: 559: 525: 508: 492: 475: 458: 439: 428: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 368: 310: 309: 271: 270: 258: 243: 242: 193: 192: 129: 125:AfD statistics 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 764: 752: 750: 745: 739: 738: 735: 732: 727: 725: 719: 715: 711: 708: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 687: 684: 680: 676: 669: 665: 661: 658: 654: 650: 643: 639: 635: 633: 629: 624: 619: 616: 614: 611: 610: 609: 605: 604: 597: 593: 590: 589: 586: 582: 581: 576: 574: 571: 568: 562: 561: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 533: 529: 526: 524: 520: 516: 512: 509: 507: 504: 500: 496: 493: 491: 487: 483: 479: 476: 474: 470: 466: 462: 459: 457: 454: 449: 443: 440: 438: 433: 432: 427: 425:Sven Manguard 419: 416: 415: 406: 402: 398: 393: 392: 391: 387: 386: 381: 379: 376: 373: 366: 362: 359:According to 358: 357: 356: 352: 348: 344: 343: 342: 338: 337: 332: 330: 327: 324: 318: 315: 312: 311: 308: 304: 300: 296: 294: 292: 290: 288: 286: 284: 280: 276: 273: 272: 268: 263: 262: 257: 255:Sven Manguard 250: 245: 244: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 224: 223: 222: 218: 217: 212: 210: 207: 204: 198: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 130: 126: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 743: 740: 709: 688: 663: 637: 617: 608: 607: 600: 598:comment) -- 595: 591: 579: 572: 569: 566: 537:— Preceding 527: 510: 494: 477: 460: 441: 430: 417: 384: 377: 374: 371: 365:WP:Promotion 335: 328: 325: 322: 313: 274: 260: 248: 227: 215: 208: 205: 202: 194: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 45: 43: 31: 28: 249:not an SPA. 159:free images 317:Look again 232:Off2riorob 197:COI editor 675:• Gene93k 649:• Gene93k 397:Redfarmer 363:, it is. 347:Redfarmer 299:Redfarmer 54:Redfarmer 730:Contribs 723:Armbrust 716:to pass 551:contribs 539:unsigned 515:Stroller 277:. While 120:View log 592:Comment 570:ean–Hun 532:WP:SNOW 528:Comment 465:Collect 375:ean–Hun 326:ean–Hun 314:Comment 206:ean–Hun 165:WP refs 153:scholar 93:protect 88:history 50:WP:SNOW 697:tedder 693:WP:GNG 447:Silver 361:WP:PGL 279:WP:COI 137:Google 97:delete 628:deeds 573:ter—► 567:⋙–Ber 563:Yes. 543:Meand 452:seren 378:ter—► 372:⋙–Ber 329:ter—► 323:⋙–Ber 209:ter—► 203:⋙–Ber 180:JSTOR 141:books 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 710:Keep 701:talk 689:Keep 679:talk 664:Note 653:talk 638:Note 618:keep 602:role 596:keep 547:talk 519:talk 511:Keep 495:Keep 486:talk 478:Keep 469:talk 461:Keep 442:Keep 431:Talk 418:Keep 401:talk 351:talk 303:talk 275:Keep 261:Talk 236:talk 228:keep 173:FENS 147:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 48:per 46:keep 718:GNG 673:-- 647:-- 580:(⊕) 503:and 385:(⊕) 336:(⊕) 216:(⊕) 187:TWL 122:• 118:– ( 703:) 695:. 681:) 670:. 655:) 644:. 583:) 553:) 549:• 534:? 521:) 499:me 488:) 471:) 403:) 388:) 353:) 339:) 319:. 305:) 238:) 226:- 219:) 167:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 699:( 677:( 651:( 577:( 545:( 517:( 501:_ 484:( 467:( 399:( 382:( 349:( 333:( 301:( 234:( 213:( 191:) 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 131:( 128:) 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:SNOW
Redfarmer
talk
16:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
The Bunny Museum
The Bunny Museum
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
COI editor
⋙–Berean–Hunter—►

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.