438:
me... Instead you just say I should have looked out for suggestions, which did not exist at the time of the page creation, obviously. I didn't even know how to add an argument for the salvation of the page properly until now; how is that fair? I can assure you regardless of what happens with this current witch trial, and without me, the good people of
Pittsburgh will have this page back up and heavily cited in a matter of weeks. Black Water is a project that locals in various Pittsburgh districts have been eager for for several months and will happily show their full fledged support for. And there was nothing on this page I was going to list that could not be 100% verified through legal documentation or other such sources. No speculation or bias whatsoever. Though, how can bias exist for things like "page length"... You didn't think it would be appropriate considering my newbie status to consider a "good faith" suggestion like the user above (Programming Geek)? Why not suggest it being moved to my user space considering it WILL be notable? You didn't think that would be more appropriate than a robotic "DELETE". Ridiculous for a veteran member such as yourself who should be helping novices: you sir lack the qualities of leadership
298:
to add a template with more information when I found out that my 10-minute old page was flagged. This is a real project and if the page is not deleted by tomorrow, there will be more information. Of course there is no other information available on the net if this is the first time details of the project are being disclosed. The project is registered and protected by the
Library of Congress, as well as registered with the WGA. Maybe if I had more than 10 minutes to provide additional information I could provide an amount that would suffice Mr. Everymorning's strict requirements for a page's infancy.
539:, it's not easy watching your article go up for deletion. However, that is not a reason to try and rip old Uncle Milty a new one. The problem with the article, first of all, is that it lacks reliable sources that verify that the article is indeed on a notable topic so that it may pass our guidelines (in general
484:
I apologize for not reaching you on your talk page but I visited the link and am unsure how to communicate there. I will read up on that tonight. One last quick question: Am I allowed to move the page right this moment to my user space? Even though this hearing for it's fate is currently underway? If
437:
And perhaps if you took the time to develop interpersonal skills rather than spending your valuable time, your life, "patrolling the web" you could have offered me, as a novice page creator, advice or at the very least address me directly--ping me--rather than saying "the article author" and ignoring
297:
As the author of this project, which has been underway for 4 years, I have infinite more authority on the subject than this individual who had nothing better to do with his time than flag a page I created literally after 5-10 minutes. This was my first page creation and I was in the process of trying
418:
Thank you very much for the suggestion of moving this article to my user space while it is developed further. I strongly appreciate this, and your good faith, considering other veteran users seem much more interested in just increasing their "page delete count' rather than actually bettering the
330:
of the article. Regarding the complaint about the speed of the AFD listing, perhaps if the article author had taken a moment to note any of the numerous suggestions automatically made during the process of creating the article we wouldn't be having this discussion.
400:
I can assure your good faith is not misplaced. What would moving the page to my user space entail, and would it be allowed to be moved back out of my user space after more information/citations/website/social media are provided?
166:
254:
274:
455:
Moving it to your userspace would allow you to edit it as a draft, and when more sources/article is completed it can be moved back into an article. If you need more help please visit
160:
216:
119:
126:
92:
87:
96:
79:
419:
service provided by wikipedia to its readers. In the future I will be more careful to abide by this process. Thank you again
Programming Geek.
181:
17:
148:
517:
241:
or advertising. I couldn't find a single source even mentioning this book, either that or its WP:TOOSOON, as mentioned above
142:
52:. I'm calling this "no consensus" since there's no option for "will keep momentarily to move the article to user space."
571:
552:
529:
468:
383:
353:
308:
286:
266:
245:
226:
208:
61:
40:
138:
83:
525:
502:
464:
456:
379:
188:
238:
75:
67:
304:
197:
No evidence of notability, Google searches turned up nothing remotely reliable. At best, this is a case of
536:
521:
498:
492:
486:
479:
460:
450:
439:
420:
413:
402:
395:
375:
365:
299:
223:
205:
513:
371:
567:
344:
36:
154:
319:
198:
174:
374:
and just say this gets moved to the creator's userspace. Otherwise, delete. Programming G E E K (
282:
262:
220:
202:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
566:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
548:
432:
336:
57:
540:
327:
323:
278:
258:
242:
520:
if there is no objection in three hours (reasonable?) thanks
Programming G E E K (
113:
544:
53:
512:
I understand that the majority may be in favor of deleting this, but under
326:
of the article, and who is apparently going to attempt to exercise
560:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
255:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
370:
If this article is really going to be notable, I'll assume
535:
Hold on: I'll move it for you and close this discussion.
275:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
173:
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
574:). No further edits should be made to this page.
217:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
8:
518:User:UnorthodoxMinds/The Black Water Society
273:Note: This debate has been included in the
253:Note: This debate has been included in the
215:Note: This debate has been included in the
485:I can do this I'll just move it right now.
302:
272:
252:
214:
322:, the article was created by someone
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
516:I'm going to move this page to
497:See below Programming G E E K (
459:. Thanks Programming G E E K (
324:closely related to the subject
1:
526:use words to communicate page
503:use words to communicate page
465:use words to communicate page
380:use words to communicate page
237:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a
591:
553:03:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
530:03:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
469:03:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
384:02:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
354:01:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
309:00:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
287:00:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
267:00:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
246:00:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
227:00:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
209:00:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
62:03:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
563:Please do not modify it.
361:Delete/Move to userspace
32:Please do not modify it.
76:The Black Water Society
68:The Black Water Society
318:- Not only is it
311:
289:
269:
229:
582:
565:
496:
483:
454:
436:
417:
399:
369:
352:
351:
347:
341:
335:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
578:
572:deletion review
561:
537:UnorthodoxMinds
510:Request to move
493:UnorthodoxMinds
490:
487:UnorthodoxMinds
480:ProgrammingGeek
477:
451:UnorthodoxMinds
448:
440:UnorthodoxMinds
430:
421:UnorthodoxMinds
414:ProgrammingGeek
411:
403:UnorthodoxMinds
396:ProgrammingGeek
393:
366:UnorthodoxMinds
363:
349:
345:
337:
333:
332:
300:UnorthodoxMinds
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
577:
576:
556:
555:
543:). Thank you,
425:
388:
357:
356:
307:comment added
291:
290:
270:
249:
248:
243:editorEهեইдအ😎
239:WP:CRYSTALBALL
231:
230:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
575:
573:
569:
564:
558:
557:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
506:
504:
500:
494:
488:
481:
476:
471:
470:
466:
462:
458:
452:
447:
442:
441:
434:
429:
423:
422:
415:
410:
405:
404:
397:
392:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
367:
362:
355:
348:
342:
340:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
312:
310:
306:
301:
296:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
250:
247:
244:
240:
236:
235:Speedy Delete
233:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
562:
559:
514:WP:GOODFAITH
509:
507:
474:
472:
457:my talk page
445:
443:
427:
424:
408:
406:
390:
387:
372:WP:GOODFAITH
360:
358:
338:
315:
294:
292:
234:
221:Everymorning
203:Everymorning
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
433:Uncle Milty
339:Uncle Milty
303:—Preceding
161:free images
320:WP:TOOSOON
199:WP:TOOSOON
568:talk page
522:mah page!
499:mah page!
461:mah page!
376:mah page!
328:ownership
279:• Gene93k
259:• Gene93k
37:talk page
570:or in a
120:View log
39:or in a
475:Comment
446:Comment
305:undated
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
545:Drmies
541:WP:GNG
316:Delete
224:(talk)
206:(talk)
139:Google
97:delete
54:Drmies
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
549:talk
428:Move
409:Move
391:Move
346:talk
295:Move
283:talk
263:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
524://
501://
489:--
463://
378://
189:TWL
118:– (
551:)
528:)
508:-
505:)
467:)
444:-
382:)
359:-
343:|
331:--
285:)
277:.
265:)
257:.
219:.
201:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
547:(
495::
491:@
482::
478:@
473:-
453::
449:@
435::
431:@
426:-
416::
412:@
407:-
398::
394:@
389:-
368::
364:@
350:|
334:|
293:-
281:(
261:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.