Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/The Boston Occupier - Knowledge

Source 📝

290:. There's not enough coverage of this publication for it to have its own article at this time. I found four sources that covered the paper when it first launched (most of which are by the same paper and person). The most recent thing I could find was from January. There's no depth of coverage here to merit an article to itself. However, I do think that this would be worth having a section on the Occupy Boston page with this title being a redirect to that article. The OB page needs fleshing out anyway, so I think that this would be a good alternative to outright deletion. 357:
by three local newspapers/blogs between November and January, two of which are by the same person. There's just no depth of coverage over a longer period of time. Once the initial novelty of the idea of reporting on such a paper wore off nobody has written about it, which was my biggest reason for saying that there's not enough coverage for the paper. All of the current sources only talk about the paper's launch so I'd say it needs more than a handful of blog entries about the paper's beginnings.
356:
My issue is that most of the coverage of this paper has been primary or through non-reliable sources. There was some coverage from local newspaper/blogs that just squeak by as reliable sources, but the newspaper has not been given any in-depth coverage in any mainstream press. The current sources are
337:
is also acceptable. Article is much improved since this AfD was started. This is now an alternative newspaper that has published 9 issues in print and also publishes online. It's had nontrivial coverage in other news media. There appears to be enough here for a stand-alone article, and the topic
378:
to Occupy Boston. While such coverage the subject has received is just barely enough, from just barely noteworthy enough sources, to meet the GNG, I question whether there is - or will ever be - enough content to warrant a standalone article. Everything pertinent has already been merged.
167: 198:
Although there are some news hits for this from reliable sources there is nothing that indicates there has been significant coverage of this "newspaper" that only published one edition. Fails
218: 161: 122: 240: 262: 308:
Done. Everything has been transferred to the OB page. All that's left is to redirect now. This is notable enough for a mention on OB, but not for its own page.
338:(e.g., newspaper and Kickstarter project) is sufficiently distinct from the rest of the Occupy Boston article to make a separate article seem reasonable. -- 127: 95: 90: 99: 82: 182: 149: 17: 143: 389: 366: 347: 317: 299: 276: 254: 232: 210: 64: 408: 40: 139: 86: 189: 60: 404: 362: 313: 295: 36: 380: 206: 175: 78: 70: 155: 272: 250: 228: 56: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
403:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
358: 343: 309: 291: 202: 334: 286: 199: 51: 268: 246: 224: 116: 339: 397:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
112: 108: 104: 174: 219:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 411:). No further edits should be made to this page. 241:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 263:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 188: 8: 261:Note: This debate has been included in the 239:Note: This debate has been included in the 217:Note: This debate has been included in the 260: 238: 216: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 390:22:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 367:03:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 348:19:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 318:15:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 300:15:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 277:15:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 255:15:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 233:15:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 211:15:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 65:06:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 428: 400:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 79:The Boston Occupier 71:The Boston Occupier 285:Merge/redirect to 48:The result was 279: 266: 257: 244: 235: 222: 419: 402: 386: 267: 245: 223: 193: 192: 178: 130: 120: 102: 34: 427: 426: 422: 421: 420: 418: 417: 416: 415: 409:deletion review 398: 382: 135: 126: 93: 77: 74: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 425: 423: 414: 413: 393: 392: 372: 371: 370: 369: 351: 350: 323: 322: 321: 320: 303: 302: 281: 280: 258: 236: 196: 195: 132: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 424: 412: 410: 406: 401: 395: 394: 391: 388: 387: 385: 377: 374: 373: 368: 364: 360: 355: 354: 353: 352: 349: 345: 341: 336: 335:Occupy Boston 332: 328: 325: 324: 319: 315: 311: 307: 306: 305: 304: 301: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287:Occupy Boston 283: 282: 278: 274: 270: 264: 259: 256: 252: 248: 242: 237: 234: 230: 226: 220: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 201: 191: 187: 184: 181: 177: 173: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137:Find sources: 133: 129: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 62: 58: 54: 53: 52:Occupy Boston 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 399: 396: 383: 381: 375: 330: 326: 284: 197: 185: 179: 171: 164: 158: 152: 146: 136: 57:SarahStierch 49: 47: 31: 28: 384:Ravenswing 359:Tokyogirl79 329:. However, 310:Tokyogirl79 292:Tokyogirl79 162:free images 203:MisterUnit 405:talk page 376:Redirect: 269:• Gene93k 247:• Gene93k 225:• Gene93k 50:merge to 37:talk page 407:or in a 123:View log 39:or in a 168:WP refs 156:scholar 96:protect 91:history 340:Orlady 200:WP:GNG 140:Google 100:delete 331:merge 183:JSTOR 144:books 128:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 363:talk 344:talk 327:Keep 314:talk 296:talk 273:talk 251:talk 229:talk 207:talk 176:FENS 150:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 61:talk 333:to 190:TWL 125:• 121:– ( 365:) 346:) 316:) 298:) 275:) 265:. 253:) 243:. 231:) 221:. 209:) 170:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 63:) 55:. 361:( 342:( 312:( 294:( 271:( 249:( 227:( 205:( 194:) 186:· 180:· 172:· 165:· 159:· 153:· 147:· 142:( 134:( 131:) 119:) 81:( 59:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Occupy Boston
SarahStierch
talk
06:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
The Boston Occupier
The Boston Occupier
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:GNG

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.