172:
for alerting me to this debate. I was surprised to hear that the article is being considered for deletion on “original research” grounds because I didn’t feel I had done anything more than report on information from widely available sources. Perhaps my use of the phrase “as far as the present writer
176:
The first recorded use of the term was in reference to French policy in
Algeria in 1959 (although the word had been used earlier in the context of art history), and in 1961 the term became more widely used: in relation to Indonesia and Malaysia, the Pacific, and US policy in the Carribbean and Latin
192:: We don't do reviews of magazine articles (unless they're of proven notability, I suppose). Some of this information might best go into some article on neo-colonialism. Or references should be provided showing that multiple, independent sources have substantial coverage of this article.
211:", cited two sources which contradicted each other on the article's notability (one said it was the first instance of Gonzo journalism; the other said different article was). The other four gave references which established notability.
173:
is aware” is causing the concern, but if so I think the issue is more stylistic than substantive. Maybe it will be useful if I add that the source which I cited in the article on the early usage of “neocolonialism” reads as follows:
224:
consensus exists that multiple references to sources establishing notability are not required. I have one source directly indicating notability. I can cite others that will tend to support it, although they are not direct. --
83:
78:
87:
70:
207:
for a list (which may not be exhaustive). I looked at ten of them, not knowing beforehand what any of them were about. Five did not cite any references indicating that they were notable. One, "
110:
208:
196:
158:
134:
121:
52:
177:
America; the word was used in the New
Statesman in January 1961 and in the New Left Review by Perry Anderson and Stuart Hall in July 1961. . . .
74:
220:
is a guideline, not a policy. The fact that editors have not seen fit to delete most of the articles I mention above indicates that a
17:
66:
58:
180:
Please tell me more precisely where in the article you consider the problem to be and I will try to address your concerns.
245:
36:
244:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
151:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
217:
169:
118:
49:
145:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
226:
181:
193:
131:
104:
238:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
248:). No further edits should be made to this page.
67:The Central-American Crisis (magazine article)
59:The Central-American Crisis (magazine article)
8:
209:The Kentucky Derby is Decadent and Depraved
203:We do reviews of magazine articles. See
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
197:22:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
53:16:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
159:21:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
135:09:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
122:08:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
265:
218:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
205:Category:Magazine articles
168:. First of all, thankyou
117:Blatant WP:OR violation.
241:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
184:20:37, 09 November 2007
229:1:52, 12 November 2007
179:
216:I might mention that
174:
170:User:Hemlock Martinis
166:Creator requests keep
256:
243:
154:
148:
119:Hemlock Martinis
108:
90:
34:
264:
263:
259:
258:
257:
255:
254:
253:
252:
246:deletion review
239:
152:
146:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
262:
260:
251:
250:
233:
231:
230:
213:
212:
200:
199:
186:
185:
162:
161:
137:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
261:
249:
247:
242:
236:
235:
234:
228:
223:
219:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
198:
195:
191:
188:
187:
183:
178:
171:
167:
164:
163:
160:
156:
155:
149:
141:
138:
136:
133:
129:
128:Speedy Delete
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
240:
237:
232:
221:
204:
189:
175:
165:
143:
139:
127:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
227:La la ooh
182:La la ooh
153:lifeguard
142:per nom.
222:de facto
111:View log
194:Noroton
132:Alberon
130:As nom.
84:protect
79:history
50:W.marsh
190:Delete
140:Delete
88:delete
46:delete
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
147:Mike
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
157:|
109:– (
144:–
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
150:.
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.