310:
websites so I'm not dismissing it out of hand but this wiki-article author is clearly reaching to demonstrate notability. I'm suggesting a weak keep more for the effort that's been put in to TRY to cite this subject than the effectiveness of that effort. Notability calls for 2 non-trivial secondary sources. This appears to have 0.5 trivial secondary, 0.75 non-trivial minor secondary and about 3 x 0.25 trivial questionable sources. That math theoretically adds up to a solid 2 but obviously it's shaky math. If this article is deleted that will be understandable, but I suggest the article author be encouraged to add at least one better citation before that point. -
309:
As the nom says this has very poor sourcing (including a two sentence mention in a major publication which seems to have been duplicated verbatim, which I think might be a copyright violation). There's some more significant coverage on questionable sites, e.g. personal blogs and regional interest
169:
323:
Regional interest website and personal blogs fail the criteria for references to establish notability. A reference is either good .... or its not. There's no such thing as a fraction of a good reference.
122:
447:
279:
163:
225:
252:
129:
95:
90:
99:
82:
17:
341:
I've attempted to find a few better sources and to reword any areas that may have breached copyrights (as that was unintentional). -
184:
151:
404:
377:
217:
386:
362:
466:
145:
40:
200:
Lacks substantial support. References are no more than a single line mention and some do not mention article subject.
426:
352:
332:
314:
298:
271:
244:
64:
141:
400:
86:
443:
191:
293:
266:
239:
348:
78:
70:
462:
373:
36:
342:
396:
213:
177:
157:
435:
439:
284:
257:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
461:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
415:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
201:
55:
419:
325:
311:
116:
418:. The references provided are regional interest and not national.
455:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
389:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
365:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
112:
108:
104:
176:
395:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
371:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
280:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
469:). No further edits should be made to this page.
438:, and regional-interest-only is another issue.
226:list of California-related deletion discussions
253:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
346:
277:
250:
223:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
434:as spam sourcing does not quantify
24:
1:
486:
448:04:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
427:17:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
405:05:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
378:01:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
333:17:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
65:11:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
353:21:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
315:19:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
299:17:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
272:17:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
245:17:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
218:14:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
458:Please do not modify it.
69:
32:Please do not modify it.
436:Independence of sources
79:The Cook's Bookcase
71:The Cook's Bookcase
407:
380:
355:
301:
274:
247:
63:
477:
460:
424:
394:
392:
390:
376:
370:
368:
366:
330:
296:
290:
269:
263:
242:
236:
204:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
485:
484:
480:
479:
478:
476:
475:
474:
473:
467:deletion review
456:
420:
408:
397:Spirit of Eagle
385:
383:
381:
372:
361:
359:
326:
294:
289:
285:
267:
262:
258:
240:
235:
231:
202:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
483:
481:
472:
471:
451:
450:
429:
393:
382:
369:
358:
357:
356:
351:comment added
345:4 April 2017
338:
337:
336:
335:
318:
317:
303:
302:
287:
275:
260:
248:
233:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
482:
470:
468:
464:
459:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
428:
425:
423:
417:
413:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
391:
388:
379:
375:
374:North America
367:
364:
354:
350:
344:
340:
339:
334:
331:
329:
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
313:
308:
305:
304:
300:
297:
292:
291:
281:
276:
273:
270:
265:
264:
254:
249:
246:
243:
238:
237:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
210:
207:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
457:
454:
440:Burroughs'10
431:
421:
411:
384:
360:
327:
306:
283:
256:
229:
208:
205:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
422:-- HighKing
347:—Preceding
343:Bumsnuggler
328:-- HighKing
164:free images
295:(announce)
286:Rcsprinter
259:Rcsprinter
232:Rcsprinter
58:Sandstein
463:talk page
307:Weak Keep
37:talk page
465:or in a
387:Relisted
363:Relisted
123:View log
39:or in a
416:WP:CORP
349:undated
312:Markeer
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
432:Delete
414:Fails
412:Delete
268:(jive)
241:(note)
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
444:talk
401:talk
214:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
288:123
261:123
234:123
209:six
206:dog
203:red
192:TWL
121:– (
52:.
446:)
403:)
282:.
255:.
228:.
216:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
442:(
399:(
212:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.