284:: I fully expected to find this was just some 'ol little shopping center, but actually its notable as a very high end center, a somewhat novel development concept, and frequently called the "Rodeo Drive" of Washington D.C. Just peruse the load of references I just added (it had none at the time of the nomination -- they are bare URL cites, but can be tidied after AfD ends), it had massive coverage.--
306:. The article is about a recent 11-thousand-meter shopping building. Perhaps it has a long history, perhaps it's an NRHP site, perhaps it has become a social phenomenon, tourist destination etc... then just say so in the article! Tell the world what makes it different from the nearest Walgreens? $ 150/ft rents
326:
I already did so in the article in abbreviated form. It only opened in 2005. Its notable because its a high end luxury center that is unique in the area - its not just some run of the mill thing, as evidenced by the massive amount of coverage I found very quickly. Most mega malls don't get this
155:
149:
234:
110:
83:
78:
87:
260:
115:
70:
327:
much coverage. So, it easily meets WP:N to me. I hate shopping (though oddly I do enjoy mall history stuff), but even I know
Walgreens is not Barney's.--
186:
I'm considering this one controversial enough to give it an AFD. Does not seem terribly notable, and the article is written in a very much
170:
137:
74:
17:
203:
386:
359:
336:
313:
293:
275:
249:
224:
207:
131:
52:
127:
66:
58:
400:
36:
177:
310:
221:
399:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
309:? Lucky bastards, they call it high (duh...)! What makes the bunching of the usual LVMH suspects "a novelty"?
143:
382:
307:
199:
187:
163:
369:
332:
289:
271:
245:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
378:
351:
191:
216:(if not speedy A7). It's just a small shop building (from a sat view it appears to be
350:
Messy article but enough of the sources are substantial third party coverage to meet
328:
285:
267:
241:
49:
104:
299:
190:
fashion (famous for certain stores?). I question the notability of this. --
372:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
393:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100:
96:
92:
162:
377:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
176:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
403:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:list of Maryland-related deletion discussions
8:
261:list of Malls-related deletion discussions
255:
229:
259:: This debate has been included in the
233:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
302:is not a "white box" but a landmark
24:
358:, his otters and a clue-bat •
1:
67:The Collection at Chevy Chase
59:The Collection at Chevy Chase
420:
360:03:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
337:04:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
314:04:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
294:04:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
276:02:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
250:02:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
225:19:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
208:18:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
396:Please do not modify it.
387:00:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
53:06:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
220:smallest in the area).
44:The result was
389:
278:
264:
252:
238:
411:
398:
376:
374:
357:
356:Ten Pound Hammer
311:East of Borschov
265:
239:
222:East of Borschov
195:
194:Dennis The Tiger
181:
180:
166:
118:
108:
90:
34:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
407:
401:deletion review
394:
367:
355:
193:
123:
114:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
417:
415:
406:
405:
390:
375:
364:
363:
362:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
319:
318:
317:
316:
279:
253:
227:
184:
183:
120:
116:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
404:
402:
397:
391:
388:
384:
380:
373:
371:
366:
365:
361:
353:
349:
346:
345:
338:
334:
330:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
315:
312:
308:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
280:
277:
273:
269:
262:
258:
254:
251:
247:
243:
236:
232:
228:
226:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
117:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
395:
392:
368:
347:
303:
281:
256:
230:
217:
213:
192:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
379:Ron Ritzman
300:Rodeo Drive
282:Strong Keep
150:free images
188:peacockish
268:• Gene93k
242:• Gene93k
370:Relisted
329:Milowent
304:district
286:Milowent
111:View log
156:WP refs
144:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
352:WP:GNG
214:Delete
128:Google
88:delete
204:stuff
171:JSTOR
132:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
383:talk
348:Keep
333:talk
298:The
290:talk
272:talk
257:Note
246:talk
231:Note
202:and
200:Rawr
164:FENS
138:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
266:--
240:--
218:the
178:TWL
113:•
109:– (
385:)
354:.
335:)
292:)
274:)
263:.
248:)
237:.
206:)
158:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
381:(
331:(
288:(
270:(
244:(
198:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.