266:
as the broadcast network of a major sports team is generally notable, as a spinoff of the main article it does inherit some notability from the parent, and it easily clears the verifiability threshold based on a quick Google News search. The article could use some improvement (including a history
249:. It makes no difference "who started it". Nobody wins in a battl of reversions. Generally, a network of radio and television affiliates for sports broadcasting would be considered notable, and it does not appear that the article about the team would accomodate the information at this time.
312:
136:
103:
98:
107:
159:
This article is even more notable since several Lions game have been blacked out this season and loyal fans who can't afford to go to the game must listen on the radio.
90:
364:
338:
286:
209:
Sports-teams affiliated media networks is well established, absent any specific guidelines for establishing notability of a media network I see nothing in
94:
444:
421:
379:
353:
327:
301:
276:
258:
238:
222:
197:
183:
168:
150:
79:
86:
45:
17:
143:
Unnotable group of broadcasters that a football team syndicates stuff to. This can easily be covered in the main article.
459:
36:
458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
246:
This article and the other one appear to have been nominated following an edit war on the main article.
400:
417:
218:
193:
164:
146:
And no, I am not nominating this because the Lions did horrible this year, I just see no notability.
413:
254:
272:
180:
147:
394:
375:
349:
323:
297:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
440:
267:
section) and I'm always happy to see better sourcing but it's good enough to keep as is. -
176:
214:
189:
160:
250:
60:
56:
432:
389:
268:
188:
you had your say Viper, now let other people have theirs and don't argue with people.
64:
371:
345:
319:
293:
234:
69:
124:
436:
210:
75:
452:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
435:. In it's current form, it doesn't warrant a separate article.
431:
per
Emarsee. All I see is a paragraph and a lovely example of
232:
Would be better off as a subsection of the
Detroit Lions.
247:
131:
120:
116:
112:
313:
list of
American football-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:). No further edits should be made to this page.
412:Inherently notable. Needs references though.--
179:is not an good argument for keeping the page.
365:list of Michigan-related deletion discussions
8:
339:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
287:list of Radio-related deletion discussions
363:: This debate has been included in the
337:: This debate has been included in the
311:: This debate has been included in the
285:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
87:The Detroit Lions Radio Network
46:The Detroit Lions Radio Network
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
445:14:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
422:02:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
380:23:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
354:23:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
328:23:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
302:23:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
277:20:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
259:19:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
239:19:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
223:19:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
213:that would support a delete.
198:00:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
184:19:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
169:18:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
151:17:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
80:17:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
405:• December 27, 2008 @ 00:28
479:
455:Please do not modify it.
175:The fact that a page is
32:Please do not modify it.
51:The result was
406:
382:
368:
356:
342:
330:
316:
304:
290:
65:non-admin closure
470:
457:
403:
397:
393:
369:
359:
343:
333:
317:
307:
291:
281:
157:Very strong keep
134:
128:
110:
78:
34:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
466:
460:deletion review
453:
401:
395:
130:
101:
85:
68:
49:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
465:
464:
448:
447:
425:
424:
407:
383:
357:
331:
305:
279:
261:
241:
226:
225:
203:
202:
201:
200:
172:
171:
141:
140:
48:
43:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
463:
461:
456:
450:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
426:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
404:
398:
391:
387:
384:
381:
377:
373:
366:
362:
358:
355:
351:
347:
340:
336:
332:
329:
325:
321:
314:
310:
306:
303:
299:
295:
288:
284:
280:
278:
274:
270:
265:
262:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
242:
240:
237:
236:
231:
228:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
204:
199:
195:
191:
187:
186:
185:
182:
181:ViperSnake151
178:
174:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
148:ViperSnake151
144:
138:
133:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
82:
81:
77:
74:
71:
66:
62:
58:
54:
47:
44:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
454:
451:
428:
409:
396:NeutralHomer
385:
360:
334:
308:
282:
263:
243:
233:
229:
206:
156:
145:
142:
52:
50:
31:
28:
386:Strong Keep
207:strong keep
433:WP:NOT#DIR
215:Raitchison
190:TomCat4680
161:TomCat4680
372:• Gene93k
346:• Gene93k
320:• Gene93k
294:• Gene93k
251:Mandsford
414:Rtphokie
390:Dravecky
269:Dravecky
137:View log
235:Emarsee
104:protect
99:history
70:flaming
61:WP:SNOW
57:WP:KEEP
437:JPG-GR
388:: Per
177:useful
132:delete
108:delete
429:Merge
230:Merge
135:) – (
125:views
117:watch
113:links
73:lawye
16:<
441:talk
418:talk
410:Keep
402:Talk
392:. -
376:talk
361:Note
350:talk
335:Note
324:talk
309:Note
298:talk
283:Note
273:talk
264:Keep
255:talk
244:Keep
219:talk
211:WP:N
194:talk
165:talk
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
55:per
53:Keep
370:--
367:.
344:--
341:.
318:--
315:.
289:.
63:. (
443:)
420:)
399:•
378:)
352:)
326:)
300:)
275:)
257:)
221:)
196:)
167:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
67:)
59:/
439:(
416:(
374:(
348:(
322:(
296:(
292:—
271:(
253:(
217:(
192:(
163:(
139:)
129:(
127:)
89:(
76:r
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.