Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/The Dreamery - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

268:
somewhere, if so I do it, and then do I think about deletion. If anything warrants a discussion, you'll find out soon enough on Knowledge (XXG), and it's a shame this tidy little stub is going to get deleted when there's no need for it to be and there are far worse articles out there. Anyway, that's just my thoughts.
267:
pages, they outline an approach where you make an editorial decision and then take it from there, rather than look straight to discussion. Like I say, for me these days my deletion checklist tends to be, can I clean this article up, if so tag for cleanup or do it myself, can I redirect or merge it
291: 110: 236:. We don't need afd for this sort of stuff. The first rule for people when nominating for deletion should be, can I redirect this somewhere. 259:
Since the prod was removed in Feb the article has haedly been touched and I don't see how a redirect avoids a discussion. Have a look at
17: 83: 78: 250:
Well, since the PROD was removed in February, I assume it's a somewhat controversial issue, so it might warrant a discussion. --
87: 166: 70: 315:
I had a quick nose around and found some links. I can't see any reason this couldn't be expanded into a larger article. (
358: 36: 357:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
187: 340: 319: 306: 277: 254: 245: 224: 206: 194: 170: 142: 129: 52: 49: 191: 215:
as not notable - small press, small run, and not really covered enough to generate reliable sources.
251: 220: 126: 139: 74: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
260: 122: 302: 273: 241: 264: 203: 329: 118: 233: 117:
This article about a comic book does not assert notability. It is unclear why it meets
333: 337: 216: 160: 316: 66: 58: 104: 298: 269: 237: 351:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
121:. PROD was contested in February. -- Sent here as part of the 186:
Notability is not stated, thus it should be deleted per
158:- user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — 100: 96: 92: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 361:). No further edits should be made to this page. 328:Does not have the sources necessary to satisfy 292:list of Comics and animation-related deletions 8: 290:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 202:Notability not asserted or evident. 265:the being bold, revert and discuss 138:, nothing to indicate notability. 24: 211:I have a copy of this someplace. 1: 341:03:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 53:18:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 320:16:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 307:11:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 278:16:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 255:11:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 246:11:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 225:21:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 207:19:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 195:18:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 171:22:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 143:17:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 130:15:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 378: 48:as a useful search term. 354:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 123:Notability wikiproject 332:or the more general 309: 305: 295: 276: 244: 223: 369: 356: 301: 296: 286: 272: 240: 219: 163: 108: 90: 34: 377: 376: 372: 371: 370: 368: 367: 366: 365: 359:deletion review 352: 169: 159: 81: 65: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 375: 373: 364: 363: 346: 344: 343: 323: 310: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 234:Eclipse Comics 227: 209: 197: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 165: 146: 145: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 374: 362: 360: 355: 349: 348: 347: 342: 339: 335: 331: 327: 324: 321: 318: 314: 311: 308: 304: 300: 293: 289: 285: 279: 275: 271: 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 253: 252:B. Wolterding 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 228: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 208: 205: 201: 198: 196: 193: 189: 188:WP:Notability 185: 182: 181: 172: 168: 162: 157: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 144: 141: 137: 134: 133: 132: 131: 128: 127:B. Wolterding 124: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 353: 350: 345: 325: 312: 287: 229: 212: 199: 183: 155: 140:Doctorfluffy 135: 116: 67:The Dreamery 59:The Dreamery 45: 43: 31: 28: 192:Icestorm815 204:Decoratrix 313:Weak keep 338:Jay32183 230:Redirect 217:Tony Fox 161:xDanielx 111:View log 46:redirect 317:Emperor 261:be bold 84:protect 79:history 50:W.marsh 326:Delete 299:Hiding 270:Hiding 238:Hiding 221:(arf!) 213:Delete 200:Delete 184:Delete 136:Delete 88:delete 330:WP:BK 119:WP:BK 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 334:WP:N 303:Talk 288:Note 274:Talk 263:and 242:Talk 156:Note 125:. -- 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 294:. 232:to 109:– ( 336:. 190:. 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 322:) 297:— 167:C 164:/ 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
W.marsh
18:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
The Dreamery
The Dreamery
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:BK
Notability wikiproject
B. Wolterding
15:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Doctorfluffy
17:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
xDanielx
C
22:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
WP:Notability
Icestorm815
18:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Decoratrix
19:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.