Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/The Green Hope - Knowledge

Source 📝

267:: Not sure what the guidelines are for notability of TV shows, but this was a reasonably well-known show, still recognizable and "referable" as a pop culture artifact. Regarding systemic bias, I'm fairly sure that a US TV show with similar impact and audience would be covered (extensively) in En-wikipedia, for whatever that's worth. That said, not many reliable sources in English (search "The Green Hope TVB" and a number of blogs and the like appear, which speak to lingering interest, which suggests but does not prove notability). Obviously a lot more in Chinese, probably sufficient if anyone wants to do some digging. BTW, 2000 is "very old"? I feel 249:. This is a known series in Hong Kong. It's very old, I'm pretty sure I still see posters of it sometimes at old video shops, but other than that I don't think there will be any internet references for it. Maybe in very old print gossip magazines. 187:. After source searching, haven't found significant coverage in reliable sources. Google News archives has zero results other than this Knowledge page. Posting this at AfD, rather than prodding the article, in hopes to avoid the potential for 152: 207: 146: 226: 91: 86: 95: 78: 17: 167: 134: 372: 349: 40: 128: 188: 353: 332: 297: 258: 238: 218: 199: 124: 60: 368: 326: 213: 194: 36: 174: 345: 160: 82: 254: 234: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
367:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
321: 309: 279: 140: 74: 66: 291: 250: 230: 54: 112: 184: 312:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
282:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
361:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
183:
This topic about a Hong Kong television series appears to fail
108: 104: 100: 159: 319:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
289:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 375:). No further edits should be made to this page. 208:list of Television-related deletion discussions 227:list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions 173: 8: 225:Note: This debate has been included in the 206:Note: This debate has been included in the 224: 205: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 333:01:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 298:01:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 259:01:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 239:00:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 219:07:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 200:12:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 354:01:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 61:01:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 392: 344:widely broadcast TV show. 364:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:The result was 335: 300: 241: 221: 217: 198: 383: 366: 329: 324: 318: 314: 294: 288: 284: 216: 214:Northamerica1000 211: 197: 195:Northamerica1000 192: 178: 177: 163: 116: 98: 57: 34: 391: 390: 386: 385: 384: 382: 381: 380: 379: 373:deletion review 362: 346:Stowonthewolder 327: 322: 307: 292: 277: 212: 193: 120: 89: 73: 70: 55: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 389: 387: 378: 377: 357: 356: 338: 337: 336: 316: 315: 304: 303: 302: 301: 286: 285: 274: 273: 272: 262: 243: 242: 222: 191:on Knowledge. 181: 180: 117: 75:The Green Hope 69: 67:The Green Hope 64: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 388: 376: 374: 370: 365: 359: 358: 355: 351: 347: 343: 340: 339: 334: 331: 330: 325: 317: 313: 311: 306: 305: 299: 296: 295: 287: 283: 281: 276: 275: 270: 266: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 223: 220: 215: 209: 204: 203: 202: 201: 196: 190: 189:systemic bias 186: 176: 172: 169: 166: 162: 158: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 126: 123: 122:Find sources: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 363: 360: 341: 320: 308: 290: 278: 268: 264: 246: 182: 170: 164: 156: 149: 143: 137: 131: 121: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 147:free images 369:talk page 231:• Gene93k 37:talk page 371:or in a 310:Relisted 280:Relisted 39:or in a 328:polisme 293:MBisanz 269:ancient 251:Dengero 247:Comment 153:WP refs 141:scholar 92:protect 87:history 56:MBisanz 271:now... 125:Google 96:delete 168:JSTOR 129:books 113:views 105:watch 101:links 16:< 350:talk 342:Keep 323:Theo 265:Keep 255:talk 235:talk 185:WP:N 161:FENS 135:news 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 50:keep 175:TWL 352:) 257:) 237:) 229:. 210:. 155:) 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 52:. 348:( 261:} 253:( 233:( 179:) 171:· 165:· 157:· 150:· 144:· 138:· 132:· 127:( 119:( 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
MBisanz
01:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The Green Hope
The Green Hope
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:N
systemic bias
Northamerica1000
12:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
list of Television-related deletion discussions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.