322:), and a description of a "controversy" consisting of an article in the first issue with apparently an angry response in the second issue, making for quite a circular argument for notability. As for "don't like it", I don't care what this magazine publishes, all I care about is that there is no indication that this meets
342:
Thanks for taking the time to make these well expressed comments. I agree that the case for delete is very good. I almost "voted" that way myself. I also wasn't saying that your nomination was based on "I don't like it." The ideas which this magazine seems to promote are very dangerous and, to me at
189:
Article de-PRODded by creator, PROD concern was "Non-notable magazine. No independent sources, no indication that this meets WP:GNG in any way". A few apparently independent sources added, but none of great import (and at least one probably not a
301:
1/ Whether a magazine is cited in WP articles or not, is immaterial to questions of notability. 2/ The "secondary sources" mentioned by
Kitfoxxe consist of an obscure Norwegian magazine and another magazine for which the URL itself
158:
217:), contains new translations of several well known authors and is widely available. There is no reason to delete the article, though additional external sources should possibly be requested/added.--
277:
236:
This seems like the type of serious topic WP should have articles on. There is at least some secondary sourcing. I'm aware that some people "don't like it." I don't like it myself.
152:
119:
254:
92:
87:
314:: note that this nominally "biannual" magazine has published one issue in 2008 and one in 2010), tables of contents and quotes from articles (violates
96:
326:. I have not addressed the problems signaled here, because I did not want to remove that text (most of the article) just before taking it to AfD. --
79:
173:
140:
17:
364:
There's a potential copyright issue with this article. The text as it was originally posted appears to have been copy-pasted from
310:. 3/ The current article consists of mentioning that there have been two issues published and that a third is planned (violates
134:
396:
130:
36:
381:
352:
335:
292:
269:
245:
226:
203:
61:
319:
180:
222:
83:
369:
395:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
377:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
343:
least, distasteful. So "I don't like it." But still it could be important. At least this is a serious topic.
75:
67:
311:
57:
146:
218:
373:
166:
348:
241:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
331:
288:
265:
214:
199:
323:
315:
307:
49:
372:
suggests that is a problem. If it's decided to keep the article it will need a re-write.
191:
303:
344:
237:
52:
Copyvio of en.metapedia.org/The_Initiate. No judgement with regards to notability.
113:
327:
284:
261:
195:
365:
318:) and from the publisher's website promoting the second issue (violates
209:
The
Intiate is used as source in at least two wikipedia entries (
389:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
210:
215:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Nicol%C3%A1s_G%C3%B3mez_D%C3%A1vila
109:
105:
101:
165:
368:(I can't give the exact url as it's blacklisted).
304:
http://www.users.on.net/~mmellors/TheInitiate2.html
278:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
179:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
399:). No further edits should be made to this page.
255:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
276:Note: This debate has been included in the
253:Note: This debate has been included in the
275:
252:
306:) already indicates that this is not a
211:http://en.wikipedia.org/Troy_Southgate
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
416:
382:20:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
353:19:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
336:12:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
293:12:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
270:11:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
246:10:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
227:07:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
204:07:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
62:22:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
392:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
370:This discussion at ANI
76:The Initiate (Journal)
68:The Initiate (Journal)
44:The result was
320:WP:NOTADVERTISING
295:
281:
272:
258:
407:
394:
282:
259:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
415:
414:
410:
409:
408:
406:
405:
404:
403:
397:deletion review
390:
308:reliable source
219:BenthamBrackets
192:reliable source
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
413:
411:
402:
401:
385:
384:
374:Ka Faraq Gatri
358:
357:
356:
355:
339:
338:
273:
249:
248:
230:
229:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
412:
400:
398:
393:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
359:
354:
350:
346:
341:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:WP:NOTCRYSTAL
309:
305:
300:
297:
296:
294:
290:
286:
279:
274:
271:
267:
263:
256:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
46:speedy delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
391:
388:
361:
298:
233:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
54:VernoWhitney
45:
43:
31:
28:
153:free images
366:Metapedia
345:Kitfoxxe
299:Comments
238:Kitfoxxe
120:View log
362:Comment
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
328:Crusio
324:WP:GNG
316:WP:NOT
285:Crusio
262:Crusio
196:Crusio
131:Google
97:delete
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
378:talk
349:talk
332:talk
289:talk
266:talk
242:talk
234:Keep
223:talk
213:and
200:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
283:--
260:--
194:).
181:TWL
118:– (
50:G12
380:)
351:)
334:)
291:)
280:.
268:)
257:.
244:)
225:)
202:)
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
48:.
376:(
347:(
330:(
302:(
287:(
264:(
240:(
221:(
198:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.