Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/The International Relations Review - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

286:
Hi, sorry - I am the page creator. I can see the concerns about notability, but like he/she said above, the journal is in the LoC (in one form or another). Plus, you can tell they've kept the page (and the publication) up-to-date and professional. It may be on the fence in terms of notability, but it
237:
You caught the publication at a difficult time to defend itself from this - it is registered (and archived) at the Library of Congress, but the editors are in the process of re-sending the physical print copies, which were seemingly not received in the first mailing. It would be easy to point to this
166: 334:
As an editor, you need to be subjective. You are lobbying for the removal of a useful article. Notability is borderline, so why lawyer it? "They" is what I assume the IP to be, the current editor(s).
160: 94: 89: 98: 81: 126: 218: 121: 181: 148: 330:
My arguments aren't that it's "just fine" so leave it, they're that it's clearly an informative, beneficial article to Knowledge (XXG).
485: 447: 426: 397: 374: 354: 325: 300: 279: 265: 247: 239: 230: 210: 63: 17: 142: 479: 138: 85: 350: 188: 238:
if the LoC had the archive up, but it is still in-progress. This would count as verifiable, permament, and independent.
77: 69: 506: 40: 154: 393: 370: 321: 275: 243: 206: 338: 362: 291:
when it is a complete, well-kept and informative article. Removal would surely make W worse, not better.
502: 422: 36: 474: 174: 457: 407: 309: 305: 389: 366: 317: 271: 261: 202: 346: 296: 226: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
501:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
331: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
418: 313: 469: 443: 270:
But the ip editor has not pointed to anything that would make the publication notable.
198: 257: 59: 342: 292: 222: 115: 52:. as the consensus says, existence is not notability ; we are not a directory 460:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
410:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
361:
Notability has not been shown to be borderline, notibility is not here. Plus
197:
Undergrad publication that lacks coverage in independent sources. No sign of
439: 54: 388:
Sending something to the Library of Congress does not make it notable.
495:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111: 107: 103: 173: 467:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →
417:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 187: 256:, giving the IP visitor the benefit of the doubt. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 509:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 219:list of Schools-related deletion discussions 217:Note: This debate has been included in the 216: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 78:The International Relations Review 70:The International Relations Review 24: 287:should always err on the side of 438:. No evidence of notability. -- 1: 526: 427:01:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC) 398:06:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 375:07:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC) 355:18:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 326:06:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 301:15:35, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 280:06:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 266:23:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 248:18:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 231:00:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 211:07:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 498:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 486:01:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 448:04:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC) 64:01:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 312:. And who is they, 48:The result was 488: 429: 358: 341:comment added by 233: 517: 500: 484: 482: 477: 472: 466: 462: 416: 412: 357: 335: 192: 191: 177: 129: 119: 101: 34: 525: 524: 520: 519: 518: 516: 515: 514: 513: 507:deletion review 496: 480: 475: 470: 468: 455: 405: 336: 134: 125: 92: 76: 73: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 523: 521: 512: 511: 491: 490: 489: 464: 463: 452: 451: 450: 432: 431: 430: 414: 413: 402: 401: 400: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 284: 283: 282: 235: 234: 195: 194: 131: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 522: 510: 508: 504: 499: 493: 492: 487: 483: 478: 473: 465: 461: 459: 454: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 434: 433: 428: 424: 420: 415: 411: 409: 404: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390:duffbeerforme 387: 384: 376: 372: 368: 367:duffbeerforme 364: 360: 359: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 333: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 318:duffbeerforme 315: 311: 307: 304: 303: 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 281: 277: 273: 272:duffbeerforme 269: 268: 267: 263: 259: 255: 252: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 232: 228: 224: 220: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 203:duffbeerforme 200: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 497: 494: 456: 435: 406: 385: 363:WP:ITSUSEFUL 337:— Preceding 288: 253: 240:130.64.67.14 236: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 419:Ron Ritzman 161:free images 199:notability 503:talk page 310:WP:NOHARM 306:WP:PRETTY 223:• Gene93k 37:talk page 505:or in a 458:Relisted 408:Relisted 351:contribs 339:unsigned 258:Chutznik 122:View log 39:or in a 386:Comment 343:Afacini 332:WP:BURO 293:Afacini 289:keeping 167:WP refs 155:scholar 95:protect 90:history 436:Delete 314:WP:COI 139:Google 99:delete 50:delete 476:music 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 116:views 108:watch 104:links 60:talk 16:< 444:talk 440:DAJF 423:talk 394:talk 371:talk 347:talk 322:talk 308:and 297:talk 276:talk 262:talk 254:Keep 244:talk 227:talk 207:talk 175:FENS 149:news 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 481:ian 189:TWL 124:• 120:– ( 55:DGG 446:) 425:) 396:) 373:) 365:. 353:) 349:• 324:) 316:? 299:) 278:) 264:) 246:) 229:) 221:. 209:) 201:. 169:) 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 62:) 471:B 442:( 421:( 392:( 369:( 345:( 320:( 295:( 274:( 260:( 242:( 225:( 205:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 118:) 80:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
DGG
talk
01:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
The International Relations Review
The International Relations Review
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
notability
duffbeerforme

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.