430:. The sources provided in the article alone show how notable it is. This was a widely noted comedy sketch which created much debate and commentary, far removed from any definitions that could qualify it as a news event alone. It is a written work that can, and was, be performed, which became notable for its controversial content. I believe that it deserves it's own article, partially considering it's size.
214:
I've nominated this for deletion as I don't think it is notable enough for its own article. If
Knowledge is going to create a page for every minor controversy in the media, it is going to become full of meaningless and unencyclopaedic material. If this article belongs anywhere, it is as a paragraph
169:
472:
is not in question, and this article covers a musical performance on that show that garnered significant attention to create "enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article"
163:
383:
130:
446:
Having an article for every one-time comedy skit that offends someone-or-other enough to make the news borders on violating WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Fails every criterion in
232:
259:
261:
103:
98:
107:
90:
65:
184:
17:
151:
145:
567:
36:
566:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
552:
535:
509:
489:
459:
439:
422:
398:
374:
351:
331:
314:
293:
272:
247:
224:
209:
72:
141:
523:
519:
502:
469:
410:
370:
361:
220:
205:
47:
485:
455:
435:
310:
191:
94:
216:
201:
60:
289:
177:
418:
413:. Sources provided do not provide significant coverage of this skit to condone its own article.
243:
468:
as far as those guidelines can speak to these types of performances. The notability of the show
548:
531:
450:- except for WP:NEWS commentary about the offensiveness, NOT the merits of the performance. --
394:
366:
258:. An incident that sparked a response from Julia Gillard and interest from worldwide media eg
157:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
481:
473:
451:
431:
327:
306:
86:
78:
477:
465:
447:
344:
55:
505:. Yes, it was a flash in the pan news item, but I don't see any lasting significance.
284:
a one line mention in the HHIS article. What next, an article on KFC advertisements? --
506:
285:
268:
414:
302:
239:
544:
527:
390:
124:
323:
337:
305:. One line mention on HHIS due to the dispiritingly widespread RS coverage.--
526:
where it's already covered. Plausible search term, but no lasting coverage.
264:
476:. Under these circumstances it cannot be qualified as "news" because of
280:
agree with nominator. This is a completely trivial item which requires
336:
This seems to have not been listed yesterday. I have listed it now.--
560:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
116:
112:
176:
359:per nom. Already covered in sufficient detail at
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
570:). No further edits should be made to this page.
384:list of Television-related deletion discussions
263:is sufficiently notable to warrant an article.
233:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
190:
8:
382:Note: This debate has been included in the
231:Note: This debate has been included in the
381:
230:
543:to ]. does not warrant its own article.
215:in the main Hey Hey It's Saturday page.
7:
24:
524:Hey Hey It's Saturday#Criticism
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
520:Hey Hey It's Saturday#Reunions
464:This article definitely meets
1:
587:
553:04:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
536:13:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
510:11:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
490:13:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
460:08:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
440:01:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
423:21:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
399:16:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
375:14:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
352:08:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
332:05:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
315:03:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
294:02:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
273:02:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
248:01:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
225:01:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
210:01:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
73:03:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
563:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
322:into the HHIS article.
503:Hey Hey It's Saturday
470:Hey Hey It's Saturday
411:Hey Hey It's Saturday
362:Hey Hey It's Saturday
48:Hey Hey It's Saturday
44:The result was
401:
387:
301:- The epitomy of
250:
236:
578:
565:
388:
349:
342:
237:
195:
194:
180:
128:
110:
87:The Jackson Jive
79:The Jackson Jive
71:
68:
63:
58:
34:
586:
585:
581:
580:
579:
577:
576:
575:
574:
568:deletion review
561:
345:
338:
137:
101:
85:
82:
66:
61:
56:
52:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
584:
582:
573:
572:
556:
555:
538:
513:
495:
494:
493:
492:
443:
442:
425:
407:Merge/redirect
403:
402:
378:
377:
354:
334:
317:
296:
275:
252:
251:
198:
197:
134:
81:
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
583:
571:
569:
564:
558:
557:
554:
550:
546:
542:
539:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
511:
508:
504:
500:
497:
496:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
400:
396:
392:
385:
380:
379:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:
358:
355:
353:
350:
348:
343:
341:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
274:
270:
266:
262:
260:
257:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
234:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
69:
64:
59:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
562:
559:
540:
515:
498:
427:
406:
367:Dave.Dunford
360:
356:
347:(Discussion)
346:
339:
319:
298:
281:
277:
255:
217:Tigerman2005
213:
202:Tigerman2005
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
482:Lord Arador
452:Yeti Hunter
432:Lord Arador
307:Yeti Hunter
303:WP:NOT#NEWS
282:at the most
200:Notability
164:free images
507:Lankiveil
474:WP:NSONGS
391:• Gene93k
286:Mattinbgn
46:merge to
541:Redirect
516:Redirect
478:WP:NTEMP
466:WP:MUSIC
448:WP:MUSIC
415:Auseplot
131:View log
545:LibStar
528:Jenks24
240:Grahame
170:WP refs
158:scholar
104:protect
99:history
357:Delete
324:Reubot
299:Delete
278:Delete
142:Google
108:delete
499:Merge
340:Bduke
320:Merge
185:JSTOR
146:books
125:views
117:watch
113:links
62:COMMS
57:ƒETCH
16:<
549:talk
532:talk
518:to
486:talk
456:talk
436:talk
428:Keep
419:talk
395:talk
371:talk
328:talk
311:talk
290:talk
269:talk
265:WWGB
256:Keep
244:talk
221:talk
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
522:or
501:to
409:to
389:--
192:TWL
129:– (
551:)
534:)
488:)
480:.
458:)
438:)
421:)
397:)
386:.
373:)
365:.
330:)
313:)
292:)
271:)
246:)
235:.
223:)
208:)
172:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
51:.
547:(
530:(
512:.
484:(
454:(
434:(
417:(
393:(
369:(
326:(
309:(
288:(
267:(
242:(
238:—
219:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
127:)
89:(
67:/
54:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.