251:- I really cannot see a valid reason to keep this. Yes, Moore's comics and the film are notable in their own respects. But that does not make an internal timeline notable by extention. Yes, a deconstruction of what Moore used/borrowed/built on/plundered can be relavent to the central topic and should be part of the article on the comics. But it should be built on secondary sources - critircal reviews of the work and/or interviews with Morre about why he picked what he did - not on the primary sources of Moore's work and his source material. -
268:, for many reasons: mostly unreferenced/based on original research, what references there are are to primary sources; on a fictional subject with no evidence of real-world notability. Fictional timelines are usually deleted, with a few rare exceptions for particularly notable/well-referenced cases; I see no reason to make this one of them.
215:
states that articles without third-party sources do not belong in
Knowledge, so arguments that primary sources are sufficient go against community consensus. A few others said that independent sources do exist for this article, but all I see are the books themselves, spliced in with some original
86:
81:
180:
76:
114:
109:
118:
101:
174:
313:
365:
141:
455:
422:
405:
380:
354:
328:
299:
277:
260:
241:
59:
339:
195:
162:
156:
398:
152:
105:
202:
97:
65:
17:
216:
research from the literary works that inspired the books. After several years... worst case this remains something that fails
211:
I'm not sure how this survived the last AFD when the few keep arguments either misinterpreted or misapplied community policy.
168:
470:
36:
469:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
287:
237:
233:
225:
188:
273:
376:
350:
324:
295:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
397:
violate NOT#PLOT; or it can be a publication timeline, which however is already presented in
451:
418:
256:
435:
55:
439:
431:
402:
390:
269:
87:
Articles for deletion/The League of
Extraordinary Gentlemen timeline (3rd nomination)
82:
Articles for deletion/The League of
Extraordinary Gentlemen timeline (2nd nomination)
372:
346:
320:
291:
229:
135:
447:
443:
414:
252:
221:
217:
212:
50:
393:. Given the article title, it can either be a fictional timeline and
77:
Articles for deletion/The League of
Extraordinary Gentlemen timeline
463:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
228:
that just re-reports information from the main article in an
314:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
366:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
131:
127:
123:
224:
due to a lack of third-party sourcse, and best case a
187:
430:
Per the rationale of the nomination. The article is
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
473:). No further edits should be made to this page.
438:and the topic does not meet the criteria of the
98:The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen timeline
66:The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen timeline
446:that address the subject directly in detail.
201:
8:
286:This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing
360:
340:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
334:
308:
436:plot-only description of a fictional work
364:: This debate has been included in the
338:: This debate has been included in the
312:: This debate has been included in the
74:
399:The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
7:
389:It's a plot summary in violation of
72:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
432:original research by synthesis
1:
456:15:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
444:reliable third-party sources
440:general notability guideline
423:21:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
406:12:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
381:00:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
355:00:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
329:00:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
300:11:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
278:12:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
261:04:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
242:04:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
60:21:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
490:
466:Please do not modify it.
401:. Nothing salvagable. –
32:Please do not modify it.
71:AfDs for this article:
290:). It is listed now.
442:since there are no
413:per above reasons,
44:The result was
383:
369:
357:
343:
331:
317:
481:
468:
370:
344:
318:
206:
205:
191:
139:
121:
34:
489:
488:
484:
483:
482:
480:
479:
478:
477:
471:deletion review
464:
148:
112:
96:
93:
91:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
487:
485:
476:
475:
459:
458:
425:
408:
384:
358:
332:
305:
304:
303:
302:
281:
280:
263:
226:WP:CONTENTFORK
209:
208:
145:
92:
90:
89:
84:
79:
73:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
486:
474:
472:
467:
461:
460:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
407:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
382:
378:
374:
367:
363:
359:
356:
352:
348:
341:
337:
333:
330:
326:
322:
315:
311:
307:
306:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:(categories)
243:
239:
235:
234:Shooterwalker
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:Find sources:
146:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
465:
462:
427:
410:
394:
386:
361:
335:
309:
265:
248:
210:
198:
192:
184:
177:
171:
165:
159:
149:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
391:WP:NOT#PLOT
175:free images
434:, it's a
373:• Gene93k
347:• Gene93k
321:• Gene93k
403:sgeureka
270:Robofish
232:manner.
230:original
142:View log
292:DumbBOT
181:WP refs
169:scholar
115:protect
110:history
448:Jfgslo
428:Delete
415:Sadads
411:Delete
395:always
387:Delete
288:step 3
266:Delete
253:J Greb
249:Delete
153:Google
119:delete
46:delete
196:JSTOR
157:books
136:views
128:watch
124:links
48:. --
16:<
452:talk
419:talk
377:talk
362:Note
351:talk
336:Note
325:talk
310:Note
296:talk
274:talk
257:talk
238:talk
222:WP:N
220:and
218:WP:V
213:WP:V
189:FENS
163:news
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
371:--
345:--
319:--
203:TWL
140:– (
454:)
421:)
379:)
368:.
353:)
342:.
327:)
316:.
298:)
276:)
259:)
240:)
183:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
58:)
450:(
417:(
375:(
349:(
323:(
294:(
272:(
255:(
236:(
207:)
199:·
193:·
185:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
155:(
147:(
144:)
138:)
100:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.